The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Macrophages at the Fetal–Maternal Interface Express Markers of Alternative Activation and Are Induced by M-CSF and IL-10
Open accessAbstract
During pregnancy, the maternal immune system is challenged by the presence of the fetus, which must be tolerated despite being semiallogeneic. Uterine mucosal (or decidual) macrophages (Mϕ), one of the major leukocyte populations at the fetal–maternal interface, have been implicated in fetal tolerance, but information regarding their regulation is scarce. In this study, we investigated the role of several factors potentially involved in the differentiation and polarization of decidual Mϕ with an in vitro Mϕ differentiation model. By using flow cytometry, we showed that M-CSF and IL-10 were potent inducers of M2 (immunoregulatory) Mϕ markers expressed on human decidual Mϕ (CD14, CD163, CD206, CD209). In contrast, proinflammatory stimuli, and unexpectedly also the Th2-associated IL-4 and IL-13, induced different patterns of expression, indicating that a Th2-dominated environment is not required for decidual Mϕ polarization. M-CSF/IL-10–stimulated and decidual Mϕ also showed similar cytokine secretion patterns, with production of IL-10 as well as IL-6, TNF, and CCL4. Conversely, the proinflammatory, LPS/IFN-γ–stimulated Mϕ produced significantly higher levels of TNF and no IL-10. We also used a gene array with 420 Mϕ-related genes, of which 100 were previously reported to be regulated in a global gene expression profiling of decidual Mϕ, confirming that M-CSF/IL-10–induced Mϕ are closely related to decidual Mϕ. Taken together, our results consistently point to a central role for M-CSF and in particular IL-10 in the shaping of decidual Mϕ with regulatory properties. These cytokines may therefore play an important role in supporting the homeostatic and tolerant immune milieu required for a successful pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534
Alternative activation of macrophages
Gordon, S. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri978 · Cited by 6,189
Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions
Gordon, S., & Martinez, F. O. (2010) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007 · Cited by 4,197
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287
Macrophage activation and polarization
Martinez, F. O. (2008) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/2692 · Cited by 3,160
Martinez, F. O., Gordon, S., Locati, M., & Mantovani, A. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303 · Cited by 2,125
Stein, M., Keshav, S., Harris, N., & Gordon, S. (1992) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.176.1.287 · Cited by 1,960
The many faces of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M. (2003) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0602325 · Cited by 1,902 · cited 16×
“2, horizontal lined gray bars) also expressed high levels of NRP-1 and CD206 and decreased levels of ICAM-3, the expression of both CD14 and CD163 was significantly decreased, and CD209 was only slightly increased as compared with blood monocytes, a phenotype that was more similar to that of Mf activated by LPS and IF…”
BackgroundInfluentialImmunosuppressive effects of apoptotic cells
Voll, R. E., Herrmann, M., Roth, E. A., Stach, C., Kalden, J. R., & Girkontaite, I. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37022 · Cited by 1,787
IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses
Krausgruber, T., Blazek, K., Smallie, T., Alzabin, S., Lockstone, H., Sahgal, N., Hussell, T., Feldmann, M., & Udalova, I. A. (2011) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.1990 · Cited by 1,306
Cited by
Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling
Mantovani, A., Biswas, S. K., Galdiero, M. R., Sica, A., & Locati, M. (2013) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4133 · Cited by 2,384
Understanding the Mysterious M2 Macrophage through Activation Markers and Effector Mechanisms
Rőszer, T. (2015) · Mediators of Inflammation · doi:10.1155/2015/816460 · Cited by 1,762
Macrophage Polarization in Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy
Yao, Y., Xu, X.-H., & Jin, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00792 · Cited by 825
Uterine NK cells and macrophages in pregnancy
Faas, M. M., & de Vos, P. (2017) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2017.03.001 · Cited by 312
The role of decidual immune cells on human pregnancy
Liu, S., Diao, L., Huang, C., Li, Y., Zeng, Y., & Kwak-Kim, J. Y. H. (2017) · Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jri.2017.10.045 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Svensson, J., Jenmalm, M. C., Matussek, A., Geffers, R., Berg, G., & Ernerudh, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-01
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3671-3682
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2165347529
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophages at the Fetal–Maternal Interface Express Markers of Alternative Activation and Are Induced by M-CSF and IL-10. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.1100130
- The paper
- Svensson, J., Jenmalm, M. C., Matussek, A., Geffers, R., Berg, G., & Ernerudh, J. (2011). Macrophages at the Fetal–Maternal Interface Express Markers of Alternative Activation and Are Induced by M-CSF and IL-10. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1100130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.