The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To discuss issues and concerns in the application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to the decision to have a child. Methods: We review the basic structure of the TPB, its principles, and its assumptions as they apply to fertility decisions. Among other issues we consider attitudes, subjective norms, and perceptions of control as antecedents to the decision to have a child; the expectancy-value model for understanding the formation of these antecedents; and the role of background factors, such as institutional policies, societal values, and personal characteristics. We illustrate key elements of the TPB using results from a multinational research project and end by considering a number of open questions for TPB-guided fertility research. Conclusions: We conclude that the TPB can usefully be employed to further our understanding of fertility decisions. By examining behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about having a child we can identify important considerations that influence this decision. The information obtained can also guide adoption of policies or interventions designed to encourage (or discourage) couples to have more children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Self-citationSelf-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1×
“Empirical support for the compatibility principle is strong and consistent (for a general review, see Ajzen and Fishbein 1977; Fishbein and Ajzen 2010).”
Self-citationPrediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Self-citationWebb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 · Cited by 3,732
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688
Webb, T. L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1376 · Cited by 2,517
Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x · Cited by 1,244 · cited 2×
“…occasion been faulted for positing rational actors who carefully plan their behavior when, it is suggested, human behavior is often irrational or spontaneous, based largely on judgmental heuristics and intuition (see, for example, Gibbons, Gerrard, Blanton, and Russell 1998; Reyna and Farley 2006).”
BackgroundIntention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior
Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843 · Cited by 1,024
Self-citationIs Lowest‐Low Fertility in Europe Explained by the Postponement of Childbearing?
Sobotka, T. (2004) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.010_1.x · Cited by 355
Cited by
A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework
Vignoli, D., Guetto, R., Bazzani, G., Pirani, E., & Minello, A. (2020) · Genus · doi:10.1186/s41118-020-00094-3 · Cited by 332
From Some to None? Fertility Expectation Dynamics of Permanently Childless Women
Gemmill, A. (2019) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0739-7 · Cited by 63
Certainty of meeting fertility intentions declines in Europe during the 'Great Recession'
Testa, M. R., & Gietel-Basten, S. (2014) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2014.31.23 · Cited by 66
“The parity specificity of fertility intentions has been largely emphasised in previous research (Ajzen and Klobas 2013).”
ResultMencarini, L., Vignoli, D., Zeydanli, T., & Kim, J. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206202 · Cited by 50
Could Pronatalist Policies Discourage Childbearing?
Botev, N. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00048.x · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J.
- Venue
- Demographic Research
- Published
- 2013-07-31
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 203-232
- ISSN
- 1435-9871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104167547
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 46.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
