Cited by 172Treatment of Major DepressionTryptophan and brain disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Efficacy of Adjunctive N-Acetylcysteine in Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Open access
Berk, Michael, Dean, Olivia M., Cotton, Sue M., Jeavons, Susan, Tanious, Michelle, Kohlmann, Kristy, Hewitt, Karen, Moss, Kirsteen +8 more·2014·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders, conferring considerable individual, family, and community burden. To date, treatments for MDD have been derived from the monoamine hypothesis, and there is a paucity of emerging antidepressants, especially with novel mechanisms of action and treatment targets. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a redox-active glutathione precursor that decreases inflammatory cytokines, modulates glutamate, promotes neurogenesis, and decreases apoptosis, all of which contribute to the neurobiology of depression. METHOD: Participants with a current episode of MDD diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR criteria (N = 252) were treated with NAC or placebo in addition to treatment as usual for 12 weeks and were followed to 16 weeks. Data were collected between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: The omnibus interaction between group and visit for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the primary outcome measure, was not significant (F₁,₅₂₀.₉ = 1.98, P = .067), and the groups did not separate at week 12 (t₃₆₀.₃ = -1.12, P = .265). However, at week 12, the scores on the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation-Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE-RIFT) differed from placebo (P = .03). Among participants with a MADRS score ≥ 25, NAC separated from placebo at weeks 6, 8, 12, and 16 (P < .05). Additionally, the rate of change between baseline and week 16 was significant (t₂₂₁.₀₃ = -2.11, P = .036). NAC treatment was superior to placebo at week 16 for secondary readouts of function and clinical impression. Remission and response were greater in the NAC group at week 16, but not at week 12. The NAC group had a greater rate of gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Being negative at the week 12 end point, and with some positive secondary signals, the study provides only limited support for the role of NAC as a novel adjunctive therapy for MDD. These data implicate the pathways influenced by NAC in depression pathogenesis, principally oxidative and inflammatory stress and glutamate, although definitive confirmation remains necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12607000134426.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.13m08454

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
  2. [24]24. International conference on harmonisation: guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials (ICH-E9). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm073137. pdf. Updated September 1998. Accessed March 31, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berk, M., Dean, O. M., Cotton, S. M., Jeavons, S., Tanious, M., Kohlmann, K., Hewitt, K., Moss, K., Allwang, C., Schapkaitz, I., Robbins, J., Cobb, H., Ng, F., Dodd, S., Bush, A. I., & Malhi, G. S.
Affiliations
  • Barwon Health (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Berk, Michael
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2014-06-15
Volume
75
Issue
06
Pages
628-636
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099204286
Cited by
172
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 2
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, N-acetylcysteine, adjunctive therapy, glutathione precursor, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, glutamate, antidepressant efficacy, adverse events, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, depression pathogenesis, redox signaling, neurogenesis, apoptosis, monoamine hypothesis, newer antidepressants, treatment-resistant depression
MeSH terms
Acetylcysteine, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review