Cited by 306Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSmoking Behavior and Cessation

A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of N -Acetylcysteine in Cannabis-Dependent Adolescents

Open access
Gray, Kevin M., Carpenter, Matthew J., Baker, Nathaniel L., DeSantis, Stacia M., Kryway, Elisabeth, Hartwell, Karen J., McRae-Clark, Aimee L., Brady, Kathleen T.·2012·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Preclinical findings suggest that the over-the-counter supplement N-acetylcysteine (NAC), via glutamate modulation in the nucleus accumbens, holds promise as a pharmacotherapy for substance dependence. The authors investigated NAC as a novel cannabis cessation treatment in adolescents, a vulnerable group for whom existing treatments have shown limited efficacy. METHOD: In an 8-week double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, treatment-seeking cannabis-dependent adolescents (ages 15-21 years; N=116) received NAC (1200 mg) or placebo twice daily as well as a contingency management intervention and brief (<10 minutes) weekly cessation counseling. The primary efficacy measure was the odds of negative weekly urine cannabinoid test results during treatment among participants receiving NAC compared with those receiving placebo, in an intent-to-treat analysis. The primary tolerability measure was frequency of adverse events, compared by treatment group. RESULTS: Participants receiving NAC had more than twice the odds, compared with those receiving placebo, of having negative urine cannabinoid test results during treatment (odds ratio=2.4, 95% CI=1.1-5.2). Exploratory secondary abstinence outcomes favored NAC but were not statistically significant. NAC was well tolerated, with minimal adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized controlled trial of pharmacotherapy for cannabis dependence in any age group to yield a positive primary cessation outcome in an intent-to-treat analysis. Findings support NAC as a pharmacotherapy to complement psychosocial treatment for cannabis dependence in adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010055

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CB1 agonists, gabapentin, and N-acetylcysteine have been shown to produce improvements in some symptoms of CUD in single studies.

    “Some drugs, such as CB1 agonists, gabapentin, and N-acetylcysteine, have been shown to produce improvements in some symptoms of CUD in single studies”

    From Psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of cannabis use disorder (2018) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Results > Efficacy section reports that adolescents receiving N-acetylcysteine had significantly greater odds of negative urine cannabinoid tests during treatment. Our copy does not report improvements from gabapentin or CB1 agonists; it lists a dronabinol trial in the References without giving its findings. The demonstrated outcome is cannabis use, rather than a specified CUD symptom. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • N-acetylcysteine produced positive results for cannabis use cessation and craving in past open-label and placebo-controlled trials among adolescents.

    “a number of trials have evaluated N-acetylcysteine, a modulator of glutamatergic receptors, because of positive results for cannabis use cessation and subjective measures (craving) in past open-label and placebo-controlled trials among adolescents 68, 69.”

    From Psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of cannabis use disorder (2018) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Discussion reports improved cannabis abstinence with N-acetylcysteine versus placebo in adolescents when added to contingency management and counseling. The Introduction calls an earlier open-label pilot trial encouraging, but the paper does not report a positive craving result for either trial; its stated efficacy outcomes concern cannabis use and abstinence. The indexed copy provides section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Positive trials of N-acetylcysteine for cannabis use disorders among adolescents, smoking, and bipolar depression among adults suggest that N-acetylcysteine may benefit adolescents with comorbid bipolar and SUDs; however, studies examining this hypothesis have not yet been completed (level 4).

    “Positive trials of N‐acetylcysteine for cannabis use disorders among adolescents,618 smoking,619 and bipolar depression among adults 281 suggest that N‐acetylcysteine may benefit adolescents with comorbid bipolar and SUDs; however, studies examining this hypothesis have not yet been completed (level 4).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]First M Spitzer R Gibbon M Williams J Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I Disorders 2004 Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York, NY Patient Edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, K. M., Carpenter, M. J., Baker, N. L., DeSantis, S. M., Kryway, E., Hartwell, K. J., McRae-Clark, A. L., & Brady, K. T.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, the Hollings Cancer Center, and the Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston.
Corresponding author
Gray, Kevin M.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-08
Volume
169
Issue
8
Pages
805-812
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2121945096
Cited by
306
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Supernus Pharmaceuticals
  • Shire
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000062)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA020482, R01DA026777)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029882)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
N-acetylcysteine, cannabis use disorder, adolescents, cannabis cessation, pharmacotherapy, contingency management, glutamate modulation, nucleus accumbens, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Acetylcysteine, Adolescent, Cannabinoids, Marijuana Abuse, Counseling, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review