Cited by 44Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSchizophrenia research and treatmentPharmaceutical studies and practices

Efficacy and Safety of Guanfacine Extended-Release in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Open access
Iwanami, Akira, Saito, Kazuhiko, Fujiwara, Masakazu, Okutsu, Daiki, Ichikawa, Hironobu·2020·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess guanfacine extended-release (GXR) efficacy and safety in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (conducted between October 2016 and July 2017) included Japanese patients aged ≥ 18 years with ADHD (DSM-5). Patients received GXR (n = 101) or placebo (n = 100) titrated from 2 mg/d to 4-6 mg/d (dose-optimization; 5 weeks), followed by 4-6 mg/d (dose-maintenance; 5 weeks), then tapered doses to 2 mg/d (2 weeks). Primary endpoint was change from baseline in total score on the Japanese version of the ADHD-Rating Scale IV with adult prompts (ADHD-RS-IV) at week 10. Other measures were ADHD-RS-IV subscales, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) and Patient Global Impression-Improvement scale (PGI-I) (percentage of patients very much improved/much improved), treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidences, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, there was statistically significantly greater improvement in ADHD-RS-IV total score reduction with GXR (least squares mean ± SE: GXR vs placebo, -11.55 ± 1.10 vs -7.27 ± 1.07; P = .0005; effect size 0.52). There were significantly greater improvements in GXR for ADHD-RS-IV inattention (-7.39 ± 0.79 vs -4.89 ± 0.76; P = .0032) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (-3.84 ± 0.54 vs -2.10 ± 0.52; P = .0021) subscale scores, CGI-I scores (48.1% vs 22.6%; P = .0007), and PGI-I scores (25.3% vs 11.8%; P = .0283). More patients in the GXR versus the placebo group reported TEAEs (81.2% vs 62.0%) and discontinued due to TEAEs (19.8% vs 3.0%). The main TEAEs in the GXR group were somnolence, thirst, blood pressure decrease, nasopharyngitis, postural dizziness, and constipation; most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese adults with ADHD, GXR improved ADHD symptoms without any major safety concerns. Trial Registration: Japan Primary Registries Network (https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en): JapicCTI-163231

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.19m12979

Cites

28 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Faraone SV, Biederman J. What is the prevalence of adult ADHD? results of a population screen of 966 adults. J Atten Disord. 2005;9(2):384-391.
  2. Matsuo Y, Okita M, Ermer J, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single and multiple doses of guanfacine extended-release formulation in healthy Japanese and Caucasian male adults. Clin Drug Investig. 2017;37(8):745-753.
  3. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 35. Arnsten AF, Jin LE. Guanfacine for the treatment of cognitive disorders: a century of discoveries at Yale. Yale J Biol Med. 2012;85(1):45-58. · DOI
  4. Ichikawa H, Miyajima T, Yamashita Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of guanfacine hydrochloride extended-release tablet for children and adolescents with ADHD: a phase 2/3 placebo-controlled, double-blind study in Japan. Jpn J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018;21(8):1093-1117.
  5. Ichikawa H, Miyajima T, Yamashita Y, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of guanfacine hydrochloride extended-release tablet for children and adolescents with ADHD: a phase 2/3 long-term, open-label extension study in Japan. Jpn J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018;21(12):1645-1661.
  6. Hervas A, Huss M, Johnson M, et al. Efficacy and safety of extended-release guanfacine hydrochloride in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, controlled, phase III trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24(12):1861-1872.
  7. Ichikawa H, Saito K, Saito T, et al. Reliability and validity of the ADHD-RS-IV with adult prompts: the Japanese version. Clin Psychiatry. 2018;60(4):399-409.
  8. Brod M, Johnston J, Able S, et al. Validation of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality-of-Life Scale (AAQoL): a disease-specific quality-of-life measure. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(1):117-129.
  9. Cortese S, Adamo N, Del Giovane C, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(9):727-738.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iwanami, A., Saito, K., Fujiwara, M., Okutsu, D., & Ichikawa, H.
Affiliations
  • SHOWA Medical University (JP)
  • Imperial Gift Foundation Boshi-Aiiku-Kai (JP)
  • Shionogi (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Iwanami, Akira
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2020-04-14
Volume
81
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W3016594565
Cited by
44
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
guanfacine extended release, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, ADHD-RS-IV, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, treatment-emergent adverse events, drug discontinuation, dose titration, treatment efficacy and safety, Japanese patients, CGI-I
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Guanfacine, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review