Cited by 93Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSchizophrenia research and treatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Functional Outcomes in the Treatment of Adults With ADHD

Adler, Lenard A., Spencer, Thomas J., Levine, Louise R., Ramsey, Janet L., Tamura, Roy, Kelsey, Douglas, Ball, Susan G., Allen, Albert J. +1 more·2008·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: ADHD is associated with significant functional impairment in adults. The present study examined functional outcomes following 6-month double-blind treatment with either atomoxetine or placebo. Method: Patients were 410 adults (58.5% male) with DSM-IV—defined ADHD. They were randomly assigned to receive either atomoxetine 40 mg/day to 80 mg/day ( n = 271) or placebo ( n = 139). The primary functional outcome measure was the Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS), and the secondary measure was the Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL). Patients were seen for four visits in 6 months. Results: At 6 months, both groups had nonsignificantly different improvements in EWPS total scores. Atomoxetine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement than placebo-treated patients on the AAQoL after controlling for baseline severity of ADHD. Both treatment groups had low 6-month study completion rates. Conclusion: Following 6-month treatment with atomoxetine, adults with ADHD showed significantly greater improvement in functioning on disease-specific measures of quality of life than patients treated with placebo. ( J. of Att. Dis. 2008; 11(6) 720-727)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054707308490

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adler, L. A., Spencer, T. J., Levine, L. R., Ramsey, J. L., Tamura, R., Kelsey, D., Ball, S. G., Allen, A. J., & Biederman, J.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Adler, Lenard A.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2007-05-10
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
720-727
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2160892758
Cited by
93
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
adult ADHD, atomoxetine, functional outcome, labor productivity, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Double-Blind Method, Efficiency, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review