Cited by 391Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Guanfacine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Placebo-Controlled Trial

Sallee, Floyd R., Mcgough, James, Wigal, Tim, Donahue, Jessica, Lyne, Andrew, Biederman, Joseph·2009·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This study compared the efficacy of guanfacine extended release (GXR), a selective alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor agonist, with placebo in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Method This double-blind, 9-week, dose-ranging, parallel-design, multicenter trial randomized 6- to 17-year-olds with ADHD to once-daily oral GXR in 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-mg doses or placebo. Primary outcome was change in total ADHD Rating Scale-IV score from baseline to endpoint. Secondary outcomes included changes in scores of hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive subscales; clinician and parent ratings; duration of clinical effect; and safety measures.Results Statistically significant reductions in ADHD Rating Scale-IV scores were observed from baseline to endpoint at all doses of GXR, with effect sizes ranging from 0.43 to 0.62. In subjects receiving GXR, mean heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased as the dose of GXR increased and then returned toward baseline during the dose-maintenance and dose-tapering phases of the trial. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (> or = 5%) were somnolence, headache, fatigue, sedation, dizziness, irritability, upper abdominal pain, and nausea. Somnolence, sedation, and fatigue adverse events emerged within the first 2 weeks of dosing and generally resolved by study end.Conclusions : Guanfacine extended-release was effective in reducing symptoms of ADHD. Adverse events were mild to moderate, did not interfere with improvements in attention, and rarely led to discontinuation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/chi.0b013e318191769e

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the exception of one pemoline study and adolescent subgroups in two guanfacine studies, all studies in adolescents with ADHD without SUD reported significant improvements in ADHD symptoms in active medication compared with placebo, with effect sizes of d = 0.53-1.33 for MPH, d = 0.80-1.23 for LDX, d = 0.80 for MAS-XR, d = 2.05 for pemoline, d = 0.99 for atomoxetine, and d = 0.52 for guanfacne

    “With the exception of one pemoline study [33] and the adolescent subgroups in two guanfacine studies [45,46], all studies reported significant improvements in ADHD symptoms in the active medication compared with the placebo groups, with moderate to large effect sizes of Cohen’s d = 0.53–1.33 for MPH, d = 0.80–1.23 for LDX, d = 0.80 for MAS-XR, d = 2.05 for pemoline, d = 0.99 for atomoxetine, and d”
  • Double-blind placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that guanfacine is effective in treating ADHD symptoms.

    “double-blind placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that guanfacine is effective in treating ADHD symptoms”
  • In two short-term, placebo-controlled, double-blind pivotal trials, extended-release guanfacine (Intuniv) as monotherapy reduced symptoms of ADHD, as measured by clinician-rated ADHD-RS-IV total score and the hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattentiveness subscale scores.

    “In 2 short-term, placebo-controlled, double-blind pivotal trials, an extended-release formulation of guanfacine (Intuniv™, Shire US Inc.) has shown efficacy as monotherapy for reducing symptoms of ADHD based on clinician-rated ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score as well as the hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattentiveness subscale scores (Biederman et al., 2008; Sallee et al., 2009).”
  • Once-daily extended-release guanfacine has proven effective in both short-term and long-term studies.

    “Recently, once-daily extended-release guanfacine has proven effective in both short-term [90,91] and long-term studies [92,93].”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sallee, F. R., Mcgough, J., Wigal, T., Donahue, J., Lyne, A., & Biederman, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sallee, Floyd R.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
155-165
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022741651
Cited by
391
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 166 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
FWCI
15.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
guanfacine extended release, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children and adolescents, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention, dose-ranging, blood pressure, heart rate, sleepiness, sedation, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Blood Pressure, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Guanfacine, Drug Delivery Systems, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review