Cited by 137Psychedelics and Drug StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Classic serotonergic psychedelics for mood and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of mood disorder patients and healthy participants

Open access
Galvão-Coelho, Nicole L., Marx, Wolfgang, Gonzalez, Maria, Sinclair, Justin, de Manincor, Michael, Perkins, Daniel, Sarris, Jerome·2021·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale: Major depressive disorder is one of the leading global causes of disability, for which the classic serotonergic psychedelics have recently reemerged as a potential therapeutic treatment option. Objective: We present the first meta-analytic review evaluating the clinical effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics vs placebo for mood state and symptoms of depression in both healthy and clinical populations (separately). Results: Our search revealed 12 eligible studies (n = 257; 124 healthy participants, and 133 patients with mood disorders), with data from randomized controlled trials involving psilocybin (n = 8), lysergic acid diethylamide ([LSD]; n = 3), and ayahuasca (n = 1). The meta-analyses of acute mood outcomes (3 h to 1 day after treatment) for healthy volunteers and patients revealed improvements with moderate significant effect sizes in favor of psychedelics, as well as for the longer-term (16 to 60 days after treatments) mood state of patients. For patients with mood disorder, significant effect sizes were detected on the acute, medium (2–7 days after treatment), and longer-term outcomes favoring psychedelics on the reduction of depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Despite the concerns over unblinding and expectancy, the strength of the effect sizes, fast onset, and enduring therapeutic effects of these psychotherapeutic agents encourage further double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing them for management of negative mood and depressive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-020-05719-1

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent quantitative findings suggest that moderate-to-high doses of psychedelics-if administered in safe and supportive contexts-may impact outcomes related to leadership, including psychological health, creative thinking, and interpersonal attitudes and behaviors.

    “recent quantitative findings suggest that moderate-to-high doses of psychedelics—if administered in safe and supportive contexts—may also impact outcomes related to leadership (see also Schlag et al., 2022 for potential risks), including psychological health (Galvão-Coelho et al., 2021), creative thinking (Prochazkova et al., 2018; Wießner et al., 2022), and interpersonal attitudes and behaviors (”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galvão-Coelho, N. L., Marx, W., Gonzalez, M., Sinclair, J., de Manincor, M., Perkins, D., & Sarris, J.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2021-01-11
Volume
238
Issue
2
Pages
341-354
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W3120778817
Cited by
137
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 19
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • La Trobe University (cc-by)
Funders
  • Multiple Sclerosis Australia
  • Deakin University
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Finance Code 001)., 88887, /2019‐00, 88887.466701/2019-00, APP1125000)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (465458/2014-9, #2014/50891-1, /2014-9)
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (#465458/2014–9, 2014/50891‐1)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (88887.466701/2019-00, 1125000)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, ayahuasca, major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms, mood states, placebo comparison, mood disorders
MeSH terms
Affect, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Hallucinogens, Humans, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, Psilocybin, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Serotonin Receptor Agonists, Mood Disorders, Banisteriopsis, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review