Cited by 1,692Health Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnesthesia and Pain Management

Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine

Open access
Tsang, Siny, Royse, ColinF, Terkawi, AbdullahSulieman·2017·Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

The task of developing a new questionnaire or translating an existing questionnaire into a different language might be overwhelming. The greatest challenge perhaps is to come up with a questionnaire that is psychometrically sound, and is efficient and effective for use in research and clinical settings. This article provides guidelines for the development and translation of questionnaires for application in medical fields, with a special emphasis on perioperative and pain medicine. We provide a framework to guide researchers through the various stages of questionnaire development and translation. To ensure that the questionnaires are psychometrically sound, we present a number of statistical methods to assess the reliability and validity of the questionnaires.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/sja.sja_203_17

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Nunnally J Psychometric Theory 1978 New York McGraw-Hill

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsang, S., Royse, C., & Terkawi, A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Tsang, Siny
Venue
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Published
2017
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
80
ISSN
  • 0975-3125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1658-354X
OpenAlex
W2618872266
Cited by
1,692
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 168 · 2025: 245 · 2024: 308 · 2023: 267 · 2022: 270 · 2021: 208 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
FWCI
23.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH013043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
questionnaire development, questionnaire translation, psychometric validation, reliability statistics, validity, perioperative medicine, pain medicine, cross-cultural adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review