The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trust in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework Linking Organizational Forms, Managerial Philosophies, and the Opportunity Costs of Controls
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926624 · Cited by 4,971
Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259200 · Cited by 2,776
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model
Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00041-7 · Cited by 1,200
A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Nature, Meaning, and Measurement of Trust
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070004547 · Cited by 995
In Whom we Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development
Williams, M. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845794 · Cited by 720
Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions
Shankar, V., Urban, G. L., & Sultan, F. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00022-7 · Cited by 671
Measuring trust inside organisations
Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480610682299 · Cited by 596
The Relationship of Communication, Ethical Work Climate, and Trust to Commitment and Innovation
Ruppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (2000) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1006290432594 · Cited by 335
Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study
Zolin, R., Hinds, P. J., Fruchter, R., & Levitt, R. E. (2004) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2003.09.002 · Cited by 228
Trust, Individualism and job characteristics as predictors of employee preference for teamwork
Kiffin-Petersen, S., & Cordery, J. (2003) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190210158538 · Cited by 198
De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2009) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0122-0 · Cited by 168
Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment
Raghuram, S., Garud, R., Wiesenfeld, B., & Gupta, V. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700309 · Cited by 137
Collective Trust within Organizations: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Insights
Kramer, R. M. (2010) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2010.9 · Cited by 84
McGrath, M. J., Duenser, A., Lacey, J., & Paris, C. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100200 · Cited by 51
Typology of trust relationships: Profiles of teachers' trust in principal and their implications
Berkovich, I. (2018) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1483914 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Creed, W. E. D., & Miles, R. E.
- Venue
- Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 16-38
- OpenAlex
- W2491695963
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.74
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.