CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 759Problem and Project Based LearningInnovations in Medical EducationSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Case-Based Learning and its Application in Medical and Health-Care Fields: A Review of Worldwide Literature

Open access
McLean, Susan F.·2016·Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
DOI 10.4137/jmecd.s20377PMC PMC5736264
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Case-based learning (CBL) is a newer modality of teaching healthcare. In order to evaluate how CBL is currently used, a literature search and review was completed. METHODS: A literature search was completed using an OVID© database using PubMed as the data source, 1946-8/1/2015. Key words used were "Case-based learning" and "medical education", and 360 articles were retrieved. Of these, 70 articles were selected to review for location, human health care related fields of study, number of students, topics, delivery methods, and student level. RESULTS: All major continents had studies on CBL. Education levels were 64% undergraduate and 34% graduate. Medicine was the most frequently represented field, with articles on nursing, occupational therapy, allied health, child development and dentistry. Mean number of students per study was 214 (7-3105). The top 3 most common methods of delivery were live presentation in 49%, followed by computer or web-based in 20% followed by mixed modalities in 19%. The top 3 outcome evaluations were: survey of participants, knowledge test, and test plus survey, with practice outcomes less frequent. Selected studies were reviewed in greater detail, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of CBL, comparisons to Problem-based learning, variety of fields in healthcare, variety in student experience, curriculum implementation, and finally impact on patient care. CONCLUSIONS: CBL is a teaching tool used in a variety of medical fields using human cases to impart relevance and aid in connecting theory to practice. The impact of CBL can reach from simple knowledge gains to changing patient care outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4137/jmecd.s20377

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 CBL use worldwide.
Figure 1 CBL use worldwide.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Fields of study.
Figure 2 Fields of study.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Mode of delivery of CBL.
Figure 3 Mode of delivery of CBL.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Method of evaluation.
Figure 4 Method of evaluation.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Differences in CBL and PBL.
Figure 5 Differences in CBL and PBL.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Mitruka K., 2014, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., 63, 393
  2. Malau-Aduli B.S., 2013, BMC Med Educ., 13, 1
  3. Keeve P.L., 2012, GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung., 29, 1
  4. Karpa K., 2012, BMC Complement Altern Med., 12, 1
  5. Persky A.M., 2012, Am J Pharm Edu., 76, 1
  6. Zimmerman S.C., 2011, J Allied Health., 40, 15
  7. Telner D., 2010, Can Fam Physician., 56, e345
  8. Kulier R., 2008, BMC Med Educ., 8, 1
  9. Giddens J.F., 2007, Nurs Educ Perspect., 28, 251
  10. Massonetto J.C., 2004, BMC Med Educ., 4, 1
  11. Sturdy S., 2007, Bull Hist Med., 81, 92
  12. Williams B., 2005, Emerg Med., 22, 577
  13. Donner R.S., 1993, Bull Med Libr Assoc., 81, 294
  14. Kirkpatrick D., 1996, Train Dev., 50, 54
  15. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma; Rotondo, MF, Peterson N., 2012, Advance Trauma Life Support Student Manual.
  16. American College of Surgeons., 2013, Surgical Education and Self Assessment Program 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 759

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
McLean, S. F.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
McLean, Susan F.
ORCID
McLean, Susan F.
Venue
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2016-01
Volume
3
ISSN
2382-1205 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.4137/jmecd.s20377
PMC
PMC5736264
OpenAlex
W2343537248
Cited by
759
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
case-based learning, medical education, healthcare education, problem-based learning, nursing education, occupational therapy, allied health, curriculum implementation, teaching methods, student outcomes, theory-practice connection, patient outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review