Cited by 132Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCell death mechanisms and regulationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Cell death during Drosophila melanogaster early oogenesis is mediated through autophagy

Open access
Nezis, Ioannis P., Lamark, Trond, Velentzas, Athanassios D., Rusten, Tor Erik, Bjørkøy, Geir, Johansen, Terje, Papassideri, Issidora S., Stravopodis, Dimitrios J. +3 more·2009·Autophagy

Abstract

Autophagy is a physiological and evolutionarily conserved process maintaining homeostatic functions, such as protein degradation and organelle turnover. Accumulating data provide evidence that autophagy also contributes to cell death under certain circumstances, but how this is achieved is not well known. Herein, we report that autophagy occurs during developmentally-induced cell death in the female germline, observed in the germarium and during middle developmental stages of oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Degenerating germline cells exhibit caspase activation, chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation and punctate staining of mCherry-DrAtg8a, a novel marker for monitoring autophagy in Drosophila. Genetic inhibition of autophagy, by removing atg1 or atg7 function, results in significant reduction of DNA fragmentation, suggesting that autophagy acts genetically upstream of DNA fragmentation in this tissue. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms that regulate cell death in vivo during development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/auto.5.3.7454

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Autophagy 2009; Vol. 5 Issue 3
  2. Nezis IP, Stravopodis DJ, Margaritis LH, Papassideri IS. Autophagy is required for the degeneration of the ovarian follicular epithelium in higher Diptera. Autophagy 2006d; 2:297-8.
  3. Mizushima N. Methods for monitoring autophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 36:2491-502.
  4. Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:931-7.
  5. Klionsky DJ, Abeliovich H, Agostinis P, Agrawal DK, Aliev G, Askew DS, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes. Autophagy 2008; 4:151-75.
  6. Van Doren M, Williamson AL, Lehmann R. Regulation of zygotic gene expression in Drosophila primordial germ cells. Curr Biol 1998; 8:243-6.
  7. Rørth P. Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline. Mech Dev 1998; 78:113-8.
  8. Scott RC, Schuldiner O, Neufeld TP. Role and regulation of starvation-induced autophagy in the Drosophila fat body. Dev Cell 2004; 7:167-78.
  9. Scott RC, Juhasz G, Neufeld TP. Direct induction of autophagy by Atg1 inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic cell death. Curr Biol 2007; 17:1-11.
  10. Juhász G, Erdi B, Sass M, Neufeld TP. Atg7-dependent autophagy promotes neuronal health, stress tolerance and longevity but is dispensable for metamorphosis in Drosophila. Genes Dev 2007; 21:3061-6.
  11. Mpakou VE, Nezis IP, Stravopodis DJ, Margaritis LH, Papassideri IS. Programmed cell death of the ovarian nurse cells during oogenesis of the silkmoth Bombyx mori. Dev Growth Differ 2006; 48:419-28.
  12. Velentzas AD, Nezis IP, Stravopodis DJ, Papassideri IS, Margaritis LH. Stage-specific regula- tion of programmed cell death during oogenesis of the medfly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae). Int J Dev Biol 2007a; 51:57-66.
  13. Velentzas AD, Nezis IP, Stravopodis DJ, Papassideri IS, Margaritis LH. Mechanisms of programmed cell death during oogenesis in Drosophila virilis. Cell Tissue Res 2007b; 327:399-414.
  14. Berry DL, Baehrecke EH. Growth arrest and autophagy are required for salivary gland cell degradation in Drosophila. Cell 2007; 131:1137-48.
  15. Chou TB, Perrimon N. The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosa- ics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1996; 144:1673-9.
  16. Pankiv S, Clausen TH, Lamark T, Brech A, Bruun J-A,Outzen H, et al. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:24131-45.
  17. Rusten TE, Vaccari T, Lindmo K, Rodahl LM, Nezis IP, Sem-Jacobsen C, et al. ESCRTs and Fab1 regulate distinct steps of autophagy. Curr Biol 2007; 17:1817-25. References
  18. Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ. Cell death: critical control points. Cell 2004; 116:205-19.
  19. Baehrecke EH. Autophagy: Dual roles in life and death? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6:505-10.
  20. Smith JE, 3rd, Cummings CA, Cronmiller C. Daughterless coordinates somatic cell prolif- eration, differentiation and germline cyst survival during follicle formation in Drosophila. Development 2002; 129:3255-67.
  21. De Lorenzo C, Strand D, Mechler BM. Requirement of Drosophila I(2)gl function for survival of the germline cells and organization of the follicle cells in a columnar epithelium during oogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 1999; 43:207-17.
  22. Nezis IP, Stravopodis DJ, Papassideri I, Margaritis LH. Actin cytoskeleton reorganization of the apoptotic nurse cells during the late developmental stages of oogenesis in Dacus oleae. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2001; 48:224-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nezis, I. P., Lamark, T., Velentzas, A. D., Rusten, T. E., Bjørkøy, G., Johansen, T., Papassideri, I. S., Stravopodis, D. J., Margaritis, L. H., Stenmark, H., & Brech, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
  • Stenmark, Harald
  • Brech, Andreas
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2009-04
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
298-302
ISSN
  • 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8635
OpenAlex
W2123112488
Cited by
132
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autophagy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Hartmann Fonden
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
cell death, Drosophila melanogaster, oogenesis, female germline, germarium, DNA fragmentation, caspase activation, Atg1, ATG7, developmental cell death
MeSH terms
Autophagy-Related Protein-1 Homolog, Autophagy-Related Protein 7, Animals, Autophagy, Chromatin, Drosophila melanogaster, Enzyme Activation, Female, Germ Cells, Male, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Oogenesis, Developmental Biology, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Caspases, Drosophila Proteins, DNA Fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review