Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reading Comprehension Difficulties

·2013·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Contents: C. Cornoldi, J. Oakhill, Introduction: Reading Comprehension Difficulties. Part I: P.B. Gough, W.A. Hoover, C.L. Peterson, Some Observations on a Simple View of Reading. K.E. Stanovich, R.F. West, A.E. Cunningham, J. Cipielewski, S. Siddiqui, The Role of Inadequate Print Exposure as a Determinant of Reading Comprehension Problems. T. Ruffman, Reassessing Children's Comprehension Monitoring Skills. Part II: J. Oakhill, N. Yuill, Higher Order Factors in Comprehension Disability: Processes and Remediation. S.E. Stothard, C. Hulme, A Comparison of Reading Comprehension and Decoding Difficulties in Children. C. Cornoldi, R. De Beni, F. Pazzaglia, Profiles of Reading Comprehension Difficulties: An Analysis of Single Cases. C.A. Perfetti, M.A. Marron, P.W. Foltz, Sources of Comprehension Failure: Theoretical Perspectives and Case Studies. Part III: K. Cain, Story Knowledge and Comprehension Skill. N. Yuill, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Classroom: Jokes, Riddles and Metalinguistic Awareness in Understanding and Improving Poor Comprehension in Children. M-F. Ehrlich, Metacognitive Monitoring in the Processing of Anaphoric Devices in Skilled and Less-skilled Comprehenders. Part IV: M.A. Barnes, M. Dennis, Reading Comprehension Deficits Arise from Diverse Sources: Evidence From Readers With and Without Developmental Brain Pathology. M. Marschark, M. Harris, Success and Failure in Learning to Read: The Special Case (?) of Deaf Children. L. Lumbelli, Focusing on Text Comprehension as a Problem-Solving Task. A Fostering Project for Culturally Deprived Children. L. Baker, Social Influences on Metacognitive Development in Reading.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203053324

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2013-04-03
OpenAlex
W1737889511
Cited by
319
References
0
FWCI
9.72
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.