CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 690Cultural Differences and ValuesEmotions and Moral BehaviorHistory of Emotions Research

Emotion in Social Relations

Parkinson, Brian, Fischer, Agneta H., Manstead, Antony S.R.·2005·Psychology Press eBooks
DOI 10.4324/9780203644966
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Within psychology, emotion is often treated as something private and personal. In contrast, this book tries to understand emotion from the 'outside,' by examining the everyday social settings in which it operates. Three levels of social influence are considered in decreasing order of inclusiveness, starting with the surrounding culture and subculture, moving on to the more delimited organization or group, and finally focusing on the interpersonal setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203644966

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpersonal or small group settings as well as professional and broader sociocultural contexts robustly shape, modulate or even dictate emotional self-regulation.

    “Ample empirical research from developmental, social and cross-cultural psychology supports the thesis that interpersonal or small group settings as well as professional and broader sociocultural contexts robustly shape, modulate or even dictate emotional (self-)regulation”

    From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Parkinson et al., 2005

  • All dimensions and aspects of emotion regulation are robustly shaped by sociocultural factors.

    “However, complex the process, the relevant point for present purposes is that all these dimensions and aspects are robustly shaped by sociocultural factors.”

    From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Parkinson et al., 2005

  • All these mechanisms and dimensions of emotion regulation are often disrupted precisely by sociocultural factors.

    “Moreover, all these mechanisms and dimensions are often disrupted precisely by these factors.”

    From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Parkinson et al., 2005

  • Emotions are inherently social.

    “a growing scholarly awareness has emerged that emotions are inherently social: They often arise in interactions with other people, are regulated in light of social norms and goals, are expressed in social situations, and exert influence on others”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Parkinson et al. 2005

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R.
ORCID
Venue
Psychology Press eBooks
Publisher
Psychology Press
Published
2005-01-01
DOI
10.4324/9780203644966
OpenAlex
W2101945320
Semantic Scholar
490d06e0452978d8b7eb1b8c3087640f0c3d1a7b
Cited by
690
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
FWCI
18.31
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Emotions Research
Keywords
emotions, interpersonal relationships, social influence, culture, subculture, organizations, groups, everyday life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review