Cited by 1,457Emotions and Moral BehaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSocial Power and Status Dynamics

How Emotions Regulate Social Life: The Emotions as Social Information (EASI) Model

Open access
Van Kleef, Gerben A.·2009·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

The idea that emotions regulate social interaction is increasingly popular. But exactly how do emotions do this? To address this question, I draw on research on the interpersonal effects of emotions on behavior in personal relationships, parent–child interactions, conflict, negotiation, and leadership, and propose a new framework that can account for existing findings and guide future research: the emotions as social information (EASI) model. I demonstrate that emotional expressions affect observers' behavior by triggering inferential processes and/or affective reactions in them. The predictive strength of these two processes—which may inspire different behaviors—depends on the observer's information processing and on social-relational factors. Examples of moderators that determine the relative predictive strength of inferences and affective reactions include power, need for cognitive closure, time pressure, display rules, and the appropriateness and target of the emotional expression, which are all discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of emotional expressions are stronger to the degree that senders are more emotionally expressive and receivers have greater emotion perception ability.

    “effects are stronger to the degree that senders are more emotionally expressive and receivers have greater emotion perception ability”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2009

    In Conclusions and Future Directions (p. 5), the paper says its analysis predicts that targets respond similarly to emotional expressions whether or not they perceive them accurately, although this remains untested. That runs contrary to the claimed stronger effects for receivers with greater emotion-perception ability. The paper does not address whether senders’ emotional expressiveness strengthens the effects. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • EASI theory postulates that emotional expressions disambiguate social situations and facilitate interpersonal coordination.

    “EASI theory postulates that emotional expressions disambiguate social situations and facilitate interpersonal coordination.”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2009

    The EASI model section (pp. 2–3) says emotional expressions provide observers with information about a situation, supporting the idea that they can clarify it. The Inferential Processes section (p. 3) gives an example in which such information helps negotiators find win-win solutions. But the paper does not posit that emotional expressions generally facilitate coordination: the Converging Versus Competing Processes section (p. 4) says they can also inspire competition. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emotional expressions provide a window into the expresser's mind.

    “emotional expressions provide a window into the expresser's mind”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2009

  • Emotions are inherently social.

    “a growing scholarly awareness has emerged that emotions are inherently social: They often arise in interactions with other people, are regulated in light of social norms and goals, are expressed in social situations, and exert influence on others”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2009

  • The relative impact of inferential processes on behavior increases when observers are more motivated and able to engage in thorough information processing and deem the emotional expression appropriate.

    “The relative impact of inferential processes on behavior increases when observers are more motivated and able to engage in thorough information processing and deem the emotional expression appropriate in light of the situation.”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Frijda, N.H. (1986). The emotions . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Kleef, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2009-06
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
184-188
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2141093480
Cited by
1,457
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 160 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 34
FWCI
35.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
emotions as social information, emotional expression, affective reactions, observer behavior, parent-child interaction, interpersonal conflict, negotiation, leadership, power, need for cognitive closure, time pressure, display rules

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review