Cited by 596Action Observation and SynchronizationEmotions and Moral BehaviorFace Recognition and Perception

Emotional Mimicry as Social Regulation

Hess, Ursula, Fischer, Agneta·2013·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

Emotional mimicry is the imitation of the emotional expressions of others. According to the classic view on emotional mimicry (the Matched Motor Hypothesis), people mimic the specific facial movements that comprise a discrete emotional expression. However, little evidence exists for the mimicry of discrete emotions; rather, the extant evidence supports only valence-based mimicry. We propose an alternative Emotion Mimicry in Context view according to which emotional mimicry is not based on mere perception but rather on the interpretation of signals as emotional intentions in a specific context. We present evidence for the idea that people mimic contextualized emotions rather than simply expressive muscle movements. Our model postulates that (implicit or explicit) contextual information is needed for emotional mimicry to take place. It takes into account the relationship between observer and expresser, and suggests that emotional mimicry depends on this relationship and functions as a social regulator.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868312472607

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional contagion is influenced by social context, such as the relationship between observer and expresser.

    “However, this is not the case, as emotional contagion is influenced by social context, for example, by the relationship between observer and expresser (Hess and Fischer, 2013).”
  • Evidence for the sequence of processes in primitive emotional contagion is mixed at best.

    “evidence for this sequence of processes is mixed at best”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Hess & Fischer 2013

  • Emotional expressions are often caught by close others in face-to-face interaction.

    “Furthermore, emotional expressions are often”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hess, U., & Fischer, A.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
142-157
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2134181527
Cited by
596
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 8
FWCI
56.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
emotional mimicry, social regulation, facial expressions
MeSH terms
Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Nonverbal Communication, Social Control, Informal, Social Environment, Social Identification, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review