Cited by 2,280Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation

Lehmann, Johannes·2015·Routledge eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203762264

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Lehmann, J.
Corresponding author
Lehmann, Johannes
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2015-02-20
OpenAlex
W2409219597
Cited by
2,280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 305 · 2025: 270 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 214 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 266 · 2020: 235 · 2019: 192 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 30
FWCI
123.41
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
biochar, environmental management, carbon sequestration, soil amendment, pollutant removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review