Cited by 371Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesMemory Processes and Influences

The Taxonomy of Metacognition

Tarricone, Pina·2011·Psychology Press eBooks

Abstract

Metacognition is a complex construct which is fundamental to learning. Its complex, fuzzy and multifaceted nature has often led to its colloquial application in research, resulting in studies that fail to identify its theoretical foundation or elements. In response to this, the research community continues to call for a comprehensive understanding of the construct of metacognition. This book is a response to this call for clarity. Pina Tarricone provides a theoretical study of the construct of metacognition in terms of psychological theory. The first part of the book analyses the relationship between reflection and metacognition, and the second part goes on to analyse the construct of metamemory as the foundation of metacognition. The third and final part of the book analyses the construct of metacognition to present the final conceptual framework of metacognition and the taxonomy of metacognition. This framework builds a picture and a nexus of the construct through visual links to the related concepts that contribute to what is known as metacognition. The Taxonomy of Metacognition provides a comprehensive representation and categorisation of all of the terms, concepts, categories, supercategories, subcategories and elements of metacognition. It clarifies the construct so that researchers and teachers can develop a better understanding of it. This important and broad ranging contribution can be applied to many related areas, by researchers, psychologists, teachers and any pro…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203830529

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Explanations that map each aspect of an output to aspects of the prompt and compare this to examples of effective prompts can help users disentangle issues with their prompt from those stemming from model performance, thereby supporting confidence adjustment for prompting ability.

    “For example, explanations that map each aspect of an output to aspects of the prompt (e.g., using attention visualization [179]), and compare this to examples of effective prompts [25,85], can help users disentangle issues with their prompt from those stemming from model performance, thereby supporting confidence adjustment for prompting ability.”

    From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [179]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarricone, P.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Tarricone, Pina
Venue
Psychology Press eBooks
Published
2011-02-28
OpenAlex
W13373333
Cited by
371
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.47
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
metacognition, metamemory, reflection, conceptual framework, construct definition, learning process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review