The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology
Open accessAbstract
This chapter provides a broad overview of corpus types and uses. It surveys five types of corpora: general, specialised, parallel, historical and multimodal. In each section, we provide a description of the corpus type, the key issues associated with the type as well as its applications in pedagogical contexts. The overview is not meant to be exhaustive, as there are many more corpora than we have space to mention. However, our aim is to introduce the main types and uses so that readers may then seek to explore the types more fully themselves, depending on their interests (see Appendix 28A for further information).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TASK-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING
Mackey, A. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104293056 · Cited by 2,843
Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction*
Malone, T. W. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2 · Cited by 2,197
AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Ellis, N. C. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310505014x · Cited by 893
A casual revolution: reinventing video games and their players
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6689 · Cited by 884
Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning: An Empirical Study
Bedwell, W. L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2012) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878112439444 · Cited by 393
Automaticity and automatization
Dekeyser, R. M. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.007 · Cited by 343
Web 2.0, Synthetic Immersive Environments, and Mobile Resources for Language Education
Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v25i3.528-546 · Cited by 316
Rethinking Communicative Language Teaching: A Focus on Access to Fluency
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005) · The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.1353/cml.2005.0016 · Cited by 292
Cornillie, F., Thorne, S. L., & Desmet, P. (2012) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344012000134 · Cited by 259
Self-citationHulstijn, J. (2002) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/0267658302sr207oa · Cited by 250
Cited by
Technology and the future of language teaching
Kessler, G. (2018) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12318 · Cited by 529
Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117700144 · Cited by 168
A Design-Driven Approach to Language Teacher Education in the Era of Digitalization
Tumelius, R., Kuure, L., & Riekki, M. (2022) · Arctic Encounters · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99104-3_2 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-02-26
- OpenAlex
- W2416024065
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 23.90
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315657899
- The paper
- The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology. (2016). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.