Cited by 67Electronic Health Records SystemsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsHealthcare Regulation

Review of Reported Clinical Information System Adverse Events in US Food and Drug Administration Databases

Open access
Myers, R.B., Jones, S.L., Sittig, D.F.·2011·Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The US FDA has been collecting information on medical devices involved in significant adverse advents since 1984. These reports have been used by researchers to advise clinicians on potential risks and complications of using these devices. OBJECTIVE: Research adverse events related to the use of Clinical Information Systems (CIS) as reported in FDA databases. METHODS: Three large, national, adverse event medical device databases were examined for reports pertaining to CIS. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty unique reports (from over 1.4 million reports) were found, representing 32 manufacturers. The manifestations of these adverse events included: missing or incorrect data, data displayed for the wrong patient, chaos during system downtime and system unavailable for use. Analysis of these reports illustrated events associated with system design, implementation, use, and support. CONCLUSION: The identified causes can be used by manufacturers to improve their products and by clinical facilities and providers to adjust their workflow and implementation processes appropriately. The small number of reports found indicates a need to raise awareness regarding publicly available tools for documenting problems with CIS and for additional reporting and dialog between manufacturers, organizations, and users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4338/aci-2010-11-ra-0064

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few studies have attempted to quantify and classify EHR-related safety concerns by mining patient safety incident reporting databases.

    “A few studies have attempted to quantify and classify EHR-related safety concerns by mining patient safety incident reporting databases.18 29–31”
  • Rapid adoption of electronic health records has revealed potential safety concerns related to EHR design, implementation, and use.

    “In particular, rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has revealed potential safety concerns related to EHR design, implementation, and use.12 17–21”
  • Previous studies have largely used isolated event reports without benefit of an independent human factors and informatics investigation to analyze safety concerns in the EHR.

    “Previous studies have largely used isolated event reports without benefit of an independent human factors and informatics investigation to analyze safety concerns in the EHR.”
  • Increasing adoption of electronic health records has revealed potential safety implications related to EHR design, implementation, and use.

    “the increasing adoption of electronic health records (EHR) has revealed potential safety implications related to EHR design, implementation, and use.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, R. B., Jones, S. L., & Sittig, D. F.
Affiliations
  • Houston Methodist (US)
  • The University of Texas System (US)
Corresponding author
Sittig, D.F.
Venue
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2011
Volume
02
Issue
01
Pages
63-74
ISSN
1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159072650
Cited by
67
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (R56LM006942)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
clinical information systems, adverse events, medical device safety, FDA adverse event reports, downtime, data errors, system design and implementation, clinical workflow, health information technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review