Cited by 204Electronic Health Records SystemsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsMedical Coding and Health Information

Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals

Open access
Sittig, Dean F., Singh, Hardeep·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Hospitals and clinics are adapting to new technologies and implementing electronic health records, but the efforts need to be aligned explicitly with goals for patient safety. EHRs bring the risks of both technical failures and inappropriate use, but they can also help to monitor and improve patient safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsb1205420

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital systems reduce visibility of system state and process integrity, making HIT hazards latent and detected indirectly through downstream consequences.

    “Digital systems frequently mediate clinical work in ways that reduce direct visibility of system state and process integrity.”

    From Why digital health fails silently: a sociotechnical theory of health information technology–related risk (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    In Phase 1, the paper says EHR operations can be opaque to end users, making problems difficult to detect, and describes data-transfer errors that can be virtually undetectable. This supports the citing sentence’s point about reduced visibility in clinical digital systems. It does not establish that HIT hazards are generally detected indirectly through downstream consequences. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Organisational guidance such as the SAFER Guides reflects a shift by emphasising governance, monitoring, and continuous self-assessment as essential components of EHR safety, rather than treating safety as a function of software reliability alone.

    “Organisational guidance such as the SAFER Guides reflects this shift by emphasising governance, monitoring, and continuous self-assessment as essential components of EHR safety, rather than treating safety as a function of software reliability alone (28, 48).”

    From Why digital health fails silently: a sociotechnical theory of health information technology–related risk (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Safer digital healthcare depends on strengthening organisational capacity to detect emerging hazards, contain their effects, and learn from system-level vulnerabilities.

    “Rather than focusing primarily on preventing individual errors, the findings suggest that safer digital healthcare depends on strengthening organisational capacity to detect emerging hazards, contain their effects, and learn from system-level vulnerabilities (28, 55).”
  • The second phase addresses unsafe or inappropriate use of technology and unsafe changes in overall workflow that emerge due to technology use.

    “The second phase addresses unsafe or inappropriate use of technology as well as unsafe changes in the overall workflow that emerge due to technology use.”
  • The first phase of the three-phase model concerns safety events unique and specific to technology (unsafe technology), which often emerge early in implementation.

    “The first phase is concerned with safety events that are unique and specific to technology (ie, unsafe technology), which often emerge early in the process of implementation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Institute of Medicine Health IT and patient safety: building safer systems for better care Washington, DC National Academies Press 2012 24600741
  2. [56]More than 100,000 health care providers paid for using electronic health records: CMS and ONC surpass 2012 goals for EHR adoption and use Press release of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 6 19 2012 http://tinyurl.com/CMS-EHR-Users

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Hermann (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-11-08
Volume
367
Issue
19
Pages
1854-1860
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2116241811
Cited by
204
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 1
FWCI
38.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS017820)
  • National Cancer Institute (K23CA125585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, patient safety, National Patient Safety Goals, EHR implementation, technical failure, patient safety monitoring, hospitals
MeSH terms
Goals, Humans, Software, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Computer Security, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Electronic Health Records, Patient Safety, Meaningful Use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review