PreprintCited by 135Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

In the Wake of Dark Giants: New Signatures of Dark Matter Self Interactions in Equal Mass Mergers of Galaxy Clusters

Open access

Abstract

Merging galaxy clusters have been touted as one of the best probes for constraining self-interacting dark matter, but few simulations exist to back up this claim. We simulate equal mass mergers of 10$^{15}$ M$_\odot$ halos, like the El Gordo and Sausage clusters, with cosmologically-motivated halo and merger parameters, and with velocity-independent dark-matter self-interactions. Although the standard lore for merging clusters is that self-interactions lead to large separations between the galaxy and dark-matter distributions, we find that maximal galaxy-dark matter offsets of $\lesssim~20$~kpc form for a self-interaction cross section of $σ_\text{SI}/m_χ$ = 1 cm$^2$/g. This is an order of magnitude smaller than those measured in observed equal mass and near equal mass mergers, and is likely to be even smaller for lower-mass systems. While competitive cross-section constraints are thus unlikely to emerge from offsets, we find other signatures of self-interactions which are more promising. Intriguingly, we find that after dark matter halos coalesce, the collisionless galaxies (and especially the Brightest Cluster Galaxy [BGC]) oscillate around the center of the merger remnant on stable orbits of 100 kpc for $σ_\text{SI}/m_χ= 1$~cm$^2$/g for at least several Gyr, well after the clusters have relaxed. If BCG miscentering in relaxed clusters remains a robust prediction of SIDM under the addition of gas physics, substructure, merger mass ratios (e.g., 10:1 like the Bullet Cluster), and complex cosmological merger histories, the observed BCG offsets may constrain $σ_\text{SI}/m_χ\lesssim$ 0.1 cm$^2$/g---the tightest constraint yet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1608.08630

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SIDM simulations show a low-density bridge forming between the two peaks after first pericenter in a bimodal merger, which shifts the centroid but not the peak, which stays with the galaxies.

    “In fact, SIDM simulations (Kahlhoefer et al. 2014;Kim et al. 2016;Robertson et al. 2017) show a low-density bridge forming between the two peaks after first pericenter in a bimodal merger.This shifts the centroid but not the peak, which stays with the galaxies.”

    From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Kim et al. (2016)

    Section 4.1 reports bridge-like dark-matter tails between the peaks after first pericenter, supporting the first part of the claim. But it says those tails can pull the dark-matter peaks toward the barycenter and increase their offset from the galaxy peaks. The assertion that only the centroid shifts while the peak stays with the galaxies is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent SIDM simulations by Kim et al. (2016) show the sign of the DM-galaxy offset changing as the drag force subsides.

    “Recent SIDM simulations by Kim et al. (2016) clearly show the sign of the DM-galaxy offset changing as this happens.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. Arkani-Hamed N., Finkbeiner D. P., Slatyer T. R., Weiner N., 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 79, 015014 · DOI
  2. Aubourg É., et al., 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 92, 123516 · DOI
  3. Boddy K. K., Feng J. L., Kaplinghat M., Tait T. M. P., 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 115017 · DOI
  4. Boylan-Kolchin M., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M., 2011, MNRAS, 415, L40 · DOI
  5. Bradač M., Allen S. W., Treu T., Ebeling H., Massey R., Morris R. G., von der Linden A., Applegate D., 2008, ApJ, 687, 959 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brooks A. M., Kuhlen M., Zolotov A., Hooper D., 2013, ApJ, 765, 22 · DOI
  7. Buckley M. R., Fox P. J., 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 81, 083522 · DOI
  8. Buckley M. R., Zavala J., Cyr-Racine F.-Y., Sigurdson K., Vogelsberger M., 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 043524 · DOI
  9. Budzynski J. M., Koposov S. E., McCarthy I. G., McGee S. L., Belokurov V., 2012, MNRAS, 423, 104 · DOI
  10. Clowe D., Markevitch M., Bradač M., Gonzalez A. H., Chung S. M., Massey R., Zaritsky D., 2012, ApJ, 758, 128 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cyr-Racine F.-Y., Sigurdson K., Zavala J., Bringmann T., Vogelsberger M., Pfrommer C., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1512.05344) · arXiv
  12. Dalal N., Kochanek C. S., 2002, ApJ, 572, 25 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Davé R., Spergel D. N., Steinhardt P. J., Wandelt B. D., 2001, ApJ, 547, 574 · DOI
  14. Dawson W. A., 2013, PhD thesis, University of California, Davis
  15. Dawson W. A., et al., 2012, ApJ, 747, L42 · DOI
  16. Donahue M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 819, 36 · DOI
  17. Dooley G. A., Peter A. H. G., Vogelsberger M., Zavala J., Frebel A., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1603.08919) · arXiv
  18. Duffy A. R., Schaye J., Kay S. T., Dalla Vecchia C., 2008, MNRAS, 390, L64 · DOI
  19. Feng J. L., Kaplinghat M., Yu H.-B., 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 151301 · DOI
  20. Ferrero I., Abadi M. G., Navarro J. F., Sales L. V., Gurovich S., 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2817 · DOI
  21. Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., Davis M., 1983, ApJ, 271, 417 · DOI
  22. George M. R., et al., 2012, ApJ, 757, 2 · DOI
  23. Girardi M., Borgani S., Giuricin G., Mardirossian F., Mezzetti M., 2000, ApJ, 530, 62 · DOI
  24. Griest K., 1988, Phys. Rev. D, 38, 2357 · DOI
  25. Guo H., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 446, 578 · DOI
  26. Harvey D., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 441, 404 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Harvey D., Massey R., Kitching T., Taylor A., Tittley E., 2015, Science, 347, 1462 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Hernandez X., Gilmore G., 1998, MNRAS, 297, 517 · DOI
  29. Hernquist L., 1990, ApJ, 356, 359 · DOI
  30. Hoshino H., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 998 · DOI
  31. Huff E. M., Graves G. J., 2014, ApJ, 780, L16 · DOI
  32. Huff E. M., Krause E., Eifler T., George M. R., Schlegel D., 2013, preprint, (arXiv:1311.1489) · arXiv
  33. Jee M. J., Mahdavi A., Hoekstra H., Babul A., Dalcanton J. J., Carroll P., Capak P., 2012, ApJ, 747, 96 · DOI
  34. Jee M. J., Hoekstra H., Mahdavi A., Babul A., 2014a, ApJ, 783, 78 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Jee M. J., Hughes J. P., Menanteau F., Sifón C., Mandelbaum R., Barrientos L. F., Infante L., Ng K. Y., 2014b, ApJ, 785, 20 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Jee M. J., et al., 2015, ApJ, 802, 46 · DOI
  37. Jiang L., Cole S., Sawala T., Frenk C. S., 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1674 · DOI
  38. Kahlhoefer F., Schmidt-Hoberg K., Frandsen M. T., Sarkar S., 2014, MN- RAS, 437, 2865 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Kahlhoefer F., Schmidt-Hoberg K., Kummer J., Sarkar S., 2015, MNRAS, 452, L54 · DOI
  40. Kaplinghat M., Keeley R. E., Linden T., Yu H.-B., 2014, Physical Review Letters, 113, 021302 · DOI
  41. Kaplinghat M., Tulin S., Yu H.-B., 2016, Physical Review Letters, 116, 041302 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kleyna J. T., Wilkinson M. I., Gilmore G., Evans N. W., 2003, ApJ, 588, L21 · DOI
  43. Klypin A., Kravtsov A. V., Valenzuela O., Prada F., 1999, ApJ, 522, 82 · DOI
  44. Kravtsov A. V., Borgani S., 2012, ARA&A, 50, 353 · DOI
  45. Kuzio de Naray R., Spekkens K., 2011, ApJ, 741, L29 · DOI
  46. Lauer T. R., Postman M., Strauss M. A., Graves G. J., Chisari N. E., 2014, ApJ, 797, 82 · DOI
  47. Lee J., Komatsu E., 2010, ApJ, 718, 60 · DOI
  48. Markevitch M., Gonzalez A. H., Clowe D., Vikhlinin A., Forman W., Jones C., Murray S., Tucker W., 2004, ApJ, 606, 819 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Martel H., Robichaud F., Barai P., 2014, ApJ, 786, 79 · DOI
  50. Massey R., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3393 · DOI
  51. Menanteau F., et al., 2012, ApJ, 748, 7 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Merten J., et al., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 333 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Moore B., Ghigna S., Governato F., Lake G., Quinn T., Stadel J., Tozzi P., 1999, ApJ, 524, L19 · DOI
  54. Mroczkowski T., et al., 2015, ApJ, 808, L6 · DOI
  55. Muzzin A., Yee H. K. C., Hall P. B., Lin H., 2007, ApJ, 663, 150 · DOI
  56. Newman A. B., Treu T., Ellis R. S., Sand D. J., Nipoti C., Richard J., Jullo E., 2013a, ApJ, 765, 24 · DOI
  57. Newman A. B., Treu T., Ellis R. S., Sand D. J., 2013b, ApJ, 765, 25 · DOI
  58. Oñorbe J., Boylan-Kolchin M., Bullock J. S., Hopkins P. F., Kereš D., Faucher-Giguère C.-A., Quataert E., Murray N., 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2092 · DOI
  59. Papastergis E., Giovanelli R., Haynes M. P., Shankar F., 2015, A&A, 574, A113 · DOI
  60. Peter A. H. G., Rocha M., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 105 · DOI
  61. Planck Collaboration et al., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1502.01589) · arXiv
  62. Pospelov M., Ritz A., Voloshin M., 2008, Physics Letters B, 662, 53 · DOI
  63. Randall S. W., Markevitch M., Clowe D., Gonzalez A. H., Bradač M., 2008, ApJ, 679, 1173 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Read J. I., Goerdt T., Moore B., Pontzen A. P., Stadel J., Lake G., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1451 · DOI
  65. Read J. I., Agertz O., Collins M. L. M., 2016, MNRAS, · DOI
  66. Ricker P. M., Sarazin C. L., 2001, ApJ, 561, 621 · DOI
  67. Robertson A., Massey R., Eke V., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1605.04307) · arXiv
  68. Rocha M., Peter A. H. G., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M., Garrison-Kimmel S., Oñorbe J., Moustakas L. A., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 81 · DOI
  69. Rossetti M., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4515 · DOI
  70. Rozo E., et al., 2009, ApJ, 699, 768 · DOI
  71. Saro A., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2305 · DOI
  72. Sawala T., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1931 · DOI
  73. Sehgal N., et al., 2013, ApJ, 767, 38 · DOI
  74. Skibba R. A., van den Bosch F. C., Yang X., More S., Mo H., Fontanot F., 2011, MNRAS, 410, 417 · DOI
  75. Skillman S. W., Xu H., Hallman E. J., O'Shea B. W., Burns J. O., Li H., Collins D. C., Norman M. L., 2013, ApJ, 765, 21 · DOI
  76. Spergel D. N., Steinhardt P. J., 2000, Physical Review Letters, 84, 3760 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Steigman G., Turner M. S., 1985, Nuclear Physics B, 253, 375 · DOI
  78. Tegmark M., et al., 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 74, 123507 · DOI
  79. Thompson R., Davé R., Nagamine K., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3030 · DOI
  80. Tremaine S., Richstone D. O., Byun Y.-I., Dressler A., Faber S. M., Grillmair C., Kormendy J., Lauer T. R., 1994, AJ, 107, 634 · DOI
  81. Umetsu K., Zitrin A., Gruen D., Merten J., Donahue M., Postman M., 2016, ApJ, 821, 116 · DOI
  82. Vegetti S., Koopmans L. V. E., Auger M. W., Treu T., Bolton A. S., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2017 · DOI
  83. Vogelsberger M., Zavala J., Loeb A., 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3740 · DOI
  84. Vogelsberger M., Zavala J., Cyr-Racine F.-Y., Pfrommer C., Bringmann T., Sigurdson K., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1512.05349) · arXiv
  85. Walker M. G., McGaugh S. S., Mateo M., Olszewski E. W., Kuzio de Naray R., 2010, ApJ, 717, L87 · DOI
  86. Zemp M., Moore B., Stadel J., Carollo C. M., Madau P., 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1543 · DOI
  87. Zhang C., Yu Q., Lu Y., 2016, ApJ, 820, 85 · DOI
  88. Zitrin A., Broadhurst T., 2009, ApJ, 703, L132 · DOI
  89. Zolotov A., et al., 2012, ApJ, 761, 71 · DOI
  90. van Weeren R. J., Brüggen M., Röttgering H. J. A., Hoeft M., 2011, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 32, 505 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S. Y., Peter, A. H. G., & Wittman, D.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Stacy Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
469
Issue
2
Pages
1414-1444
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2512274474
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1518246)
  • National Sleep Foundation (1518246)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
self-interacting dark matter, cluster mergers, El Gordo, Bullet Cluster

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review