The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networks
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Recurrent neural network based language model
Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2010) · Interspeech 2010 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2010-343 · Cited by 5,390
One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modeling
Chelba, C., Mikolov, T., Schuster, M., Ge, Q., Brants, T., Koehn, P., & Robinson, T. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.3005 · Cited by 1,051
Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer
Shazeer, N., Mirhoseini, A., Maziarz, K., Davis, A., Le, Q., Hinton, G., & Dean, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.06538 · Cited by 933
Neural Machine Translation in Linear Time
Kalchbrenner, N., Espeholt, L., Simonyan, K., Oord, A. V. D., Graves, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.10099 · Cited by 414 · cited 1×
“Later, Kalchbrenner et al. (2016) extended this mechanism with additional gates for use in translation and character-level language modeling.”
BackgroundFactorization tricks for LSTM networks
Kuchaiev, O., & Ginsburg, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.10722 · Cited by 99 · cited 2×
“…2013) 51.3 24 GPUs LSTM-2048-512 (Jozefowicz et al., 2016) 43.7 32 GPUs 2-layer LSTM-8192-1024 (Jozefowicz et al., 2016) 30.6 32 GPUs BIG GLSTM-G4 (Kuchaiev & Ginsburg, 2017) 23.3 ∗ 8 GPUs LSTM-2048 (Grave et al., 2016a) 43.9 1 GPU 2-layer LSTM-2048 (Grave et al., 2016a) 39.8 1 GPU GCNN-13 38.1 1…”
Influential
Cited by
Recent advances in convolutional neural networks
Gu, J., Wang, Z., Kuen, J., Ma, L., Shahroudy, A., Shuai, B., Liu, T., Wang, X., Wang, G., Cai, J., et al. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · Cited by 6,576
Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answering
Anderson, P., He, X., Buehler, C., Teney, D., Johnson, M., Gould, S., & Zhang, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00636 · Cited by 4,948
Transformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context
Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1285 · Cited by 3,169
Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition
Gulati, A., Qin, J., Chiu, C.-C., Parmar, N., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Han, W., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., et al. (2020) · Interspeech 2020 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2020-3015 · Cited by 3,150
Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition
Gulati, A., Qin, J., Chiu, C.-C., Parmar, N., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Han, W., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.08100 · Cited by 3,150
Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting
Lim, B., Arık, S. Ö., Loeff, N., & Pfister, T. (2021) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012 · Cited by 3,291
Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processing [Review Article]
Young, T., Hazarika, D., Poria, S., & Cambria, E. (2018) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2018.2840738 · Cited by 2,921
Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learning
Gehring, J., Auli, M., Grangier, D., Yarats, D., & Dauphin, Y. N. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.03122 · Cited by 2,850
“Our model is equipped with gated linear units (Dauphin et al., 2016) and residual connections (He et al., 2015a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSearching for activation functions
Ramachandran, P., Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.05941 · Cited by 2,335
Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Data
Conneau, A., Kiela, D., Schwenk, H., Barrault, L., & Bordes, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1070 · Cited by 2,049
Language Models as Knowledge Bases?
Petroni, F., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., Lewis, P., Bakhtin, A., Wu, Y., & Miller, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1250 · Cited by 1,834
TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning
Arik, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 · Cited by 1,771
The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration
Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M., & Choi, Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09751 · Cited by 1,304
Hierarchical Neural Story Generation
Fan, A., Lewis, M., & Dauphin, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1082 · Cited by 1,266
Self-citationLin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.10.001 · Cited by 1,422
Hierarchical Neural Story Generation
Fan, A., Lewis, M., & Dauphin, Y. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.04833 · Cited by 1,242
Self-citationNarayan, S., Cohen, S. B., & Lapata, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1206 · Cited by 1,207
Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces
Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00752 · Cited by 1,579
Attention on Attention for Image Captioning
Huang, L., Wang, W., Chen, J., & Wei, X.-Y. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00473 · Cited by 1,092
Encoding Sentences with Graph Convolutional Networks for Semantic Role Labeling
Marcheggiani, D., & Titov, I. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1159 · Cited by 907
X-Linear Attention Networks for Image Captioning
Pan, Y., Yao, T., Li, Y., & Mei, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01098 · Cited by 720
An Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep Networks
Zhu, X., Cheng, D., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Dai, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00679 · Cited by 659
What you can cram into a single $&!#* vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties
Conneau, A., Kruszewski, G., Lample, G., Barrault, L., & Baroni, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1198 · Cited by 657
Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo
Nguyen, E., Poli, M., Durrant, M. G., Kang, B., Katrekar, D., Li, D. B., Bartie, L. J., Thomas, A. W., King, S. H., Brixi, G., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado9336 · Cited by 580
Explainable Prediction of Medical Codes from Clinical Text
Mullenbach, J., Wiegreffe, S., Duke, J., Sun, J., & Eisenstein, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1100 · Cited by 597
Yao, J., Zhu, X., Jonnagaddala, J., Hawkins, N., & Huang, J. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101789 · Cited by 522
A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots
Caldarini, G., Jaf, S., & McGarry, K. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13010041 · Cited by 470
Dissecting Contextual Word Embeddings: Architecture and Representation
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Yih, W.-T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1179 · Cited by 434
A review of deep learning techniques for speech processing
Mehrish, A., Majumder, N., Bharadwaj, R., Mihalcea, R., & Poria, S. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101869 · Cited by 389
“StarGAN-VC: non-parallel many-to-many voice conversion using star generative adversarial networks,”
Kameoka, H., Kaneko, T., Tanaka, K., & Hojo, N. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt.2018.8639535 · Cited by 371
CycleGAN-VC: Non-parallel Voice Conversion Using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks
Kaneko, T., & Kameoka, H. (2018) · 2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco.2018.8553236 · Cited by 358
Sharp nearby, fuzzy far away: How neural language models use context
Khandelwal, U., He, H., Qi, P., & Jurafsky, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1027 · Cited by 303
GLU Variants Improve Transformer
Shazeer, N. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05202 · Cited by 303
Hybrid quantum-classical convolutional neural networks
Liu, J., Lim, K. H., Wood, K. L., Huang, W., Guo, C., & Huang, H.-L. (2021) · Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1734-3 · Cited by 289
Controllable Abstractive Summarization
Fan, A., Grangier, D., & Auli, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Neural Machine Translation and Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-2706 · Cited by 281
“The decoder is connected to the encoder through an attention module (Bahdanau et al., 2015) after each GLU.”
BackgroundSelf-citationCycleGAN-VC2: improved CycleGAN-based non-parallel voice conversion.
Kaneko, T., Kameoka, H., Tanaka, K., & Hojo, N. (2019) · ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8682897 · Cited by 272
Hierarchical Conditional Relation Networks for Video Question Answering
Le, T. M., Le, V., Venkatesh, S., & Tran, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00999 · Cited by 260
Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modelling
Rae, J. W., Potapenko, A., Jayakumar, S. M., & Lillicrap, T. P. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.05507 · Cited by 205
Nautsch, A., Wang, X., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T. H., Vestman, V., Todisco, M., Delgado, H., Sahidullah, M., Yamagishi, J., & Lee, K. A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science · doi:10.1109/tbiom.2021.3059479 · Cited by 185
Harvesting Paragraph-level Question-Answer Pairs from Wikipedia
Du, X., & Cardie, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1177 · Cited by 168
Eadro: An End-to-End Troubleshooting Framework for Microservices on Multi-source Data
Lee, C., Yang, T., Chen, Z., Su, Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00150 · Cited by 149
Segmentation-Aware Convolutional Networks Using Local Attention Masks
Harley, A. W., Derpanis, K. G., & Kokkinos, I. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.539 · Cited by 142
“Concurrent work in language modelling [13] and image generation [40] has also emphasized the importance of locally masked (or “gated”) convolutions.”
BackgroundChow, J. C. L., & Li, K. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16070549 · Cited by 84
Importance of Search and Evaluation Strategies in Neural Dialogue Modeling
Kulikov, I., Miller, A., Cho, K., & Weston, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-8609 · Cited by 83
Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention
Al-Rfou, R., Choe, D., Constant, N., Guo, M., & Jones, L. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013159 · Cited by 56
SenseGAN: Enabling Deep Learning for Internet of Things with a Semi-Supervised Framework
Yao, S., Zhao, Y., Shao, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, A., Hu, S., Liu, D., Liu, S., Su, L., & Abdelzaher, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3264954 · Cited by 54
Detecting Voice Cloning Attacks via Timbre Watermarking
Liu, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yang, X., Zhang, W., & Yu, N. (2024) · Proceedings 2024 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2024.24200 · Cited by 40
Ren, J., Wang, A., Li, H., Yue, X., & Meng, L. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23146547 · Cited by 34
Scaling Laws vs Model Architectures: How does Inductive Bias Influence Scaling?
Tay, Y., Dehghani, M., Abnar, S., Chung, H., Fedus, W., Rao, J., Narang, S., Tran, V., Yogatama, D., & Metzler, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.825 · Cited by 34
What Language Model to Train if You Have One Million GPU Hours?
Le Scao, T., Wang, T., Hesslow, D., Bekman, S., Bari, M. S., Biderman, S., Elsahar, H., Muennighoff, N., Phang, J., Press, O., et al. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.54 · Cited by 33
Ibrahim, A., Zhou, Y., Jenkins, M. E., Luisa Trejos, A., & Naish, M. D. (2020) · 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176132 · Cited by 15
Prakash, A., Thejaswin, S., Nambiar, A., & Bernardino, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) · doi:10.1109/ijcb57857.2023.10448765 · Cited by 5
Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders
Rajamanoharan, S., Conmy, A., Smith, L., Lieberum, T., Varma, V., Kramár, J., Shah, R., & Nanda, N. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.16014 · Cited by 3
“Taking inspiration from Gated Linear Units (Dauphin et al., 2017; Shazeer, 2020), we define the gated encoder as follows: where 𝟙 [• > 0 ] is the (pointwise) Heaviside step function and ⊙ denotes elementwise multiplication.”
MethodMiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model - From Pretraining to Posttraining
Xiaomi, L.-C., :, Xia, B., Shen, B., Cici, Zhu, D., Zhang, D., Wang, G., Zhang, H., Liu, H., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.07608 · Cited by 1
“…et al., 2017), and consists of Grouped-Query Attention (GQA, Ainslie et al. 2023), pre-RMSNorm (Zhang and Sennrich, 2019), SwiGLU activation (Dauphin et al., 2017) and Rotary Positional Embedding (RoPE, Su et al. 2024), similar to Llama (Grattafiori et al., 2024; Touvron et al., 2023) and…”
Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., C., M., Cai, J., Cai, X., Cao, P., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24653
“Gated Linear Units (GLUs) modulate a linear value branch with a sigmoid-activated gate, computing Sigmoid( W g x ) ⊙ W u x [26].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dauphin, Y., Fan, A., Auli, M., & Grangier, D.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- Cornell University
- Published
- 2016-12-23
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1612.08083
- OpenAlex
- W2567070169
- Cited by
- 1,080
- References
- 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
