The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Datasheets for Datasets
Open accessAbstract
The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we propose datasheets for datasets. In the electronics industry, every component, no matter how simple or complex, is accompanied with a datasheet that describes its operating characteristics, test results, recommended uses, and other information. By analogy, we propose that every dataset be accompanied with a datasheet that documents its motivation, composition, collection process, recommended uses, and so on. Datasheets for datasets will facilitate better communication between dataset creators and dataset consumers, and encourage the machine learning community to prioritize transparency and accountability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the electronic hardware industry provides datasheets with detailed characterizations of components' performances under different test conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Datasheets for Data Sets (Gebru et al., 2018) and Model Cards (Mitchell et al., 2019) are two examples of standardized reporting frameworks that may accompany clinical technologies.”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Gebru et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recently, researchers have proposed standardized forms of communicating characteristics of datasets used in machine learning [3, 21, 28] to help users understand the context in which the datasets should be used.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Many mature industries have developed standardized methods of benchmarking various systems under different conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,093
Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments
Huang, G. B., Mattar, M., Berg, T. L., & Miller, E. G. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 4,445
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
(2018) · Cited by 3,510
Self-citationPang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681
Self-citationThe Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. L., & Wormith, J. S. (2005) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128705281756 · Cited by 1,620
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615
The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation
Peltzman, S. (1975) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260352 · Cited by 1,568
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [7][7] Yang Trista Cao and Hal Daumé, III. 2020. Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . -
- [15][15] Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé III, Miroslav Dudík, and Hanna M. Wallach. 2019. Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?. In 2019 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . -
- [26][26] Semih Yagcioglu, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis. 2018. RecipeQA: A Challenge Dataset for Multimodal Comprehension of Cooking Recipes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,008
Cao, Y. T., & Daumé, H. (2021) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00413 · Cited by 47
“com/TristaCao/into_inclusivecoref with corresponding datasheets (Gebru et al. 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHagendorff, T. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09573-8 · Cited by 47
The unbearable (technical) unreliability of automated facial emotion recognition
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., & Mattioli, M. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221129549 · Cited by 58
Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Review of Integration Challenges for Industrial Systems
Windmann, A., Wittenberg, P., Schieseck, M., & Niggemann, O. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) · doi:10.1109/indin58382.2024.10774364 · Cited by 58
McFee, B., Kim, J. W., Cartwright, M., Salamon, J., Bittner, R., & Bello, J. P. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2875349 · Cited by 46
Tutorial: Safe and Reliable Machine LearningPreprint
Saria, S., & Subbaswamy, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.07204 · Cited by 46
Large Language Models for Text Classification: From Zero-Shot Learning to Instruction-TuningPreprint
Chae, Y., & Davidson, T. (2023) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/sthwk · Cited by 54
The Foundation Model Transparency Index
Bommasani, R., Klyman, K., Longpre, S., Kapoor, S., Maslej, N., Xiong, B., Zhang, D., & Liang, P. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.12941 · Cited by 46
Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology
Jernite, Y., Nguyen, H., Biderman, S., Rogers, A., Masoud, M., Danchev, V., Tan, S., Luccioni, A. S., Subramani, N., Johnson, I., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534637 · Cited by 75
Mittal, S., Thakral, K., Singh, R., Mayank Vatsa, A., Glaser, T., Ferrer, C. C., & Hassner, T. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00874-y · Cited by 61
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603207 · Cited by 49
Distrust of Artificial Intelligence: Sources & Responses from Computer Science & Law
Dwork, C., & Minow, M. (2022) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_a_01918 · Cited by 44
Ehsan, U., Singh, R., Metcalf, J., & Riedl, M. O. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533186 · Cited by 59
Melhárt, D., Togelius, J., Mikkelsen, B., Holmgård, C., & Yannakakis, G. N. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2023.3276425 · Cited by 40
Sourlos, N., Vliegenthart, R., Santinha, J., Klontzas, M. E., Cuocolo, R., Huisman, M., & van Ooijen, P. M. A. (2024) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-024-01833-2 · Cited by 49
Experiences with Improving the Transparency of AI Models and Services
Hind, M., Houde, S., Martino, J., Mojsilovic, A., Piorkowski, D., Richards, J., & Varshney, K. R. (2020) · Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3334480.3383051 · Cited by 44
An Examination of Fairness of AI Models for Deepfake Detection
Trinh, L., & Liu, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/79 · Cited by 44
The Model Card Authoring Toolkit: Toward Community-centered, Deliberation-driven AI Design
Shen, H., Wang, L., Deng, W. H., Brusse, C., Velgersdijk, R., & Zhu, H. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533110 · Cited by 51
Barriers to computer vision applications in pig production facilities
Li, J., Green-Miller, A. R., Hu, X., Lucic, A., Mohan, M. R. M., Dilger, R. N., Condotta, I. C. F. D. S., Aldridge, B. M., Hart, J. M., & Ahuja, N. (2022) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107227 · Cited by 52
Data Hunches: Incorporating Personal Knowledge into Visualizations
Lin, H., Akbaba, D., Meyer, M., & Lex, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3209451 · Cited by 50
Methodologies for Monitoring Mental Health on Twitter: Systematic Review
Cara, N. H. D., Maggio, V., Davis, O. S. P., & Haworth, C. M. A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42734 · Cited by 50
Malgieri, G., & Pasquale, F. (2023) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105899 · Cited by 66
The Multi-Agent Behavior Dataset: Mouse Dyadic Social Interactions
Sun, J. J., Karigo, T., Chakraborty, D., Mohanty, S. P., Wild, B., Sun, Q., Chen, C., Anderson, D. J., Perona, P., Yue, Y., et al. (2021) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02710 · Cited by 58
Kubsch, M., Krist, C., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21803 · Cited by 42
Wolfe, R., Yang, Y., Howe, B., & Caliskan, A. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594072 · Cited by 42
Large language models and political science
Linegar, M., Kocielnik, R., & Alvarez, R. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2023.1257092 · Cited by 57
Integrating ESG and AI: a comprehensive responsible AI assessment framework
Lee, S. U., Perera, H., Liu, Y., Xia, B., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Cairns, J., & Nottage, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00741-5 · Cited by 78
Characterizing and Detecting Mismatch in Machine-Learning-Enabled Systems
Lewis, G. A., Bellomo, S., & Özkaya, İ. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) · doi:10.1109/wain52551.2021.00028 · Cited by 41
What Did My AI Learn? How Data Scientists Make Sense of Model Behavior
Cabrera, Á. A., Ribeiro, M. T., Lee, B., DeLine, R. A., Perer, A., & Drucker, S. M. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3542921 · Cited by 48
Where is the Human?: Bridging the Gap Between AI and HCI
Inkpen, K., Chancellor, S., De Choudhury, M., Veale, M., & Baumer, E. P. S. (2019) · Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290607.3299002 · Cited by 54
Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI
Ehsan, U., Liao, Q. V., Passi, S., Riedl, M. O., & Daumé, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637396 · Cited by 81
Self-citationStart Generating: Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sociological Research
Davidson, T. (2024) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231241259651 · Cited by 56
Bischl, B., Casalicchio, G., Feurer, M., Gijsbers, P., Hutter, F., Lang, M., Mantovani, R. G., van Rijn, J. N., & Vanschoren, J. (2017) · TU/e Research Portal · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.03731 · Cited by 198
Machine Learning Explainability for External Stakeholders
Bhatt, U., Andrus, M., Weller, A., & Xiang, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.05408 · Cited by 41
Getting AI Right: Introductory Notes on AI & Society
Manyika, J. (2022) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_e_01897 · Cited by 54
Do, K., Pang, R. Y., Jiang, J., & Reinecke, K. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581347 · Cited by 51
AI Regulation Is (not) All You Need
Lucaj, L., van der Smagt, P., & Benbouzid, D. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594079 · Cited by 40
Berman, G., Goyal, N., & Madaio, M. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642398 · Cited by 51
Adler, D. A., Stamatis, C. A., Meyerhoff, J., Mohr, D. C., Wang, F., Aranovich, G. J., Sen, S., & Choudhury, T. (2024) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-024-00057-y · Cited by 41
Tan, M., & Subramonyam, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642592 · Cited by 40
Balakrishnan, M., Ferreira, K., & Tong, J. D. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03850 · Cited by 45
Softcite dataset: A dataset of software mentions in biomedical and economic research publications
Du, C., Cohoon, J., Lopez, P., & Howison, J. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24454 · Cited by 41
How far are we from reproducible research on code smell detection? A systematic literature review
Lewowski, T., & Madeyski, L. (2021) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106783 · Cited by 40
Martí‐Bonmatí, L., Miguel, A., Suárez‐García, A., Aznar, M., Bérégi, J.-P., Fournier, L. S., Neri, E., Laghi, A., França, M., Sardanelli, F., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.742701 · Cited by 40
About Face: A Survey of Facial Recognition EvaluationPreprint
Raji, I. D., & Fried, G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.00813 · Cited by 40
Three lines of defense against risks from AI
Schuett, J. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01811-0 · Cited by 41
AI-READI: rethinking AI data collection, preparation and sharing in diabetes research and beyond
Baxter, S. L., de Sa, V. R., Ferryman, K., Jain, P., Lee, C. S., Li‐Pook‐Than, J., Liu, T. Y. A., Owen, J. P., Patel, B. J., Yu, Q., et al. (2024) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-024-01165-x · Cited by 39
Reflections on Gender Analyses of Bibliographic Corpora
Mihaljević, H., Tullney, M., Santamaría, L., & Steinfeldt, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00029 · Cited by 39
Responsible AI: A Primer for the Legal Community
Golbin, I., Rao, A. S., Hadjarian, A., & Krittman, D. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377738 · Cited by 38
Metaphors for designers working with AI
Murray-Rust, D., Nicenboim, I. P., & Lockton, D. (2022) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2022.667 · Cited by 44
Data Representativeness in Accessibility Datasets: A Meta-Analysis
Kamikubo, R., Wang, L., Marte, C., Mahmood, A., & Kacorri, H. (2022) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3517428.3544826 · Cited by 46
Moore, S., Liao, Q. V., & Subramonyam, H. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581242 · Cited by 46
A Primer for Evaluating Large Language Models in Social-Science Research
Abdurahman, S., Ziabari, A. S., Moore, A. K., Bartels, D. M., & Dehghani, M. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251325174 · Cited by 66
Collaborative Practices with Structured Data
Koesten, L. M., Kacprzak, E., Tennison, J., & Simperl, E. P. B. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300330 · Cited by 46
Srinivasan, R., & Chander, A. (2021) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3466132.3466134 · Cited by 44
Sloane, M., & Zakrzewski, J. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533156 · Cited by 45
Ramaswamy, V., Kim, S. S. Y., Fong, R., & Russakovsky, O. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01052 · Cited by 38
BiToD: A Bilingual Multi-Domain Dataset For Task-Oriented Dialogue ModelingPreprint
Lin, Z., Madotto, A., Winata, G. I., Xu, P., Jiang, F., Hu, Y., Chen, S., & Fung, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02787 · Cited by 38
Natural language processing for clinical notes in dentistry: A systematic review
Pethani, F., & Dunn, A. G. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104282 · Cited by 42
Affective Game Computing: A Survey
Yannakakis, G. N., & Melhárt, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3315689 · Cited by 44
FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmark
Gustafson, L., Rolland, C., Ravi, N., Duval, Q., Adcock, A., Fu, C.-Y., Hall, M. A., & Ross, C. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01863 · Cited by 47
Ridley, M. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24889 · Cited by 61
Good at captioning, bad at counting: Benchmarking GPT-4V on Earth observation data
Zhang, C., & Wang, S. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00780 · Cited by 60
Cajueiro, D. O., & Celestino, V. R. R. (2025) · Journal of Economy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ject.2025.07.001 · Cited by 52
Towards trustworthy AI in Industry 5.0: Ante-hoc interpretability with deep learning
Zhou, L., Chen, L., Zhu, T., Su, X., Dong, Y., Wen, L., Liu, H., Lu, X., Leng, J., Liu, Q., et al. (2026) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2026.111805 · Cited by 41
Alvero, A., Arthurs, N., antonio, A. L., Domingue, B. W., Gebre-Medhin, B., Giebel, S., & Stevens, M. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375871 · Cited by 52
Clinician's guide to trustworthy and responsible artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging
Szabó, L. E., Raisi‐Estabragh, Z., Salih, A. M., McCracken, C., Pujadas, E. R., Gkontra, P., Kiss, M., Maurovich‐Horvat, P., Vágó, H., Merkely, B. P., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1016032 · Cited by 42
van Berkel, N., Bellio, M., Skov, M. B., & BLANDFORD, A. E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3571815 · Cited by 42
The Problem with Metrics is a Fundamental Problem for AIPreprint
Thomas, R., & Uminsky, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.08512 · Cited by 37
Using ChatGPT and Other Large Language Model (LLM) Applications for Academic Paper Assignments
Jungherr, A. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/d84q6 · Cited by 37
Chen, C., & Sundar, S. S. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580805 · Cited by 41
Epistemically violent biases in artificial intelligence design: the case of DALLE-E 2 and Starry AI
Mbalaka, B. (2023) · Digital Transformation and Society · doi:10.1108/dts-01-2023-0003 · Cited by 43
The Open Kidney Ultrasound Data Set
Singla, R., Ringstrom, C., Hu, G., Lessoway, V. A., Reid, J., Nguan, C. Y. C., & Rohling, R. N. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44521-7_15 · Cited by 46
AI Consent Futures: A Case Study on Voice Data Collection with Clinicians
Wilcox, L. G., Brewer, R. N., & Díaz, F. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610107 · Cited by 38
Ng, M. Y., Youssef, A., Miner, A. S., Sarellano, D., Long, J., Larson, D. B., Hernandez‐Boussard, T., & Langlotz, C. P. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45892 · Cited by 40
Nutritional Labels for Data and Models
Stoyanovich, J., & Howe, B. (2019) · IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin · Cited by 36
Leins, K., Lau, J. H., & Baldwin, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.261 · Cited by 45
Human Movement Datasets: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review
Olugbade, T., Bieńkiewicz, M. M. N., Barbareschi, G., D’Amato, V., Oneto, L., Camurri, A., Holloway, C., Björkman, M., Keller, P. E., Clayton, M. R. L., et al. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3534970 · Cited by 39
Norval, C., Cornelius, K. B., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. P. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533133 · Cited by 55
Documenting High-Risk AI: A European Regulatory Perspective
Hupont, I., Micheli, M., Delipetrev, B., Gómez, E., & Garrido, J. S. (2023) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2023.3235712 · Cited by 36
Lara, M. A. R., Kowalczuk, M. V. R., Eliceche, M. L., Ferraresso, M. G., Luna, D. R., Benítez, S., & Mazzuoccolo, L. D. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02630-0 · Cited by 40
The Emerging Generative Artificial Intelligence Divide in the United States
Daepp, M. I. G., & Counts, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35825 · Cited by 66
Sun, C., Asudeh, A., Jagadish, H. V., Howe, B., & Stoyanovich, J. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357853 · Cited by 35
Teaching Responsible Data Science: Charting New Pedagogical Territory
Lewis, A., & Stoyanovich, J. (2021) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00241-7 · Cited by 50
Hullman, J. R., Kapoor, S., Nanayakkara, P., Gelman, A., & Narayanan, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534196 · Cited by 48
Hupont, I., Tolan, S., Güneş, H., & Gómez, E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14981-6 · Cited by 40
Lee, V. R., Pimentel, D. R., Bhargava, R., & D’Ignazio, C. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13251 · Cited by 39
A Transparency Index Framework for AI in EducationPreprint
Chaudhry, M. A., Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2022) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/bstcf · Cited by 77
Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluation
Eriksson, M., Purificato, E., Noroozian, A., Vinagre, J., Chaslot, G., Gomez, E., & Fernandez-Llorca, D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.06559 · Cited by 35
feminist data ethics of care for machine learning: The what, why, who and how
Gray, J. E., & Witt, A. (2021) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v26i12.11833 · Cited by 42
ir_metadata: An Extensible Metadata Schema for IR Experiments
Breuer, T., Keller, J., & Schaer, P. (2022) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3477495.3531738 · Cited by 34
Rismani, S., Shelby, R. M., Smart, A., Jatho, E. W., Kroll, J. A., Moon, A., & Rostamzadeh, N. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581407 · Cited by 38
Wu, Q., Wang, J., He, Y., Liu, Y., & Jiang, Q. (2023) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2023.107929 · Cited by 34
A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithms
Coston, A., Kawakami, A., Zhu, H., Holstein, K., & Heidari, H. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00050 · Cited by 57
Datasheets for Digital Cultural Heritage Datasets
Alkemade, H., Claeyssens, S., Colavizza, G., Freire, N., Lehmann, J., Neudecker, C., Osti, G., & van Strien, D. (2023) · Journal of Open Humanities Data · doi:10.5334/johd.124 · Cited by 34
FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility
Inuwa-Dutse, I. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623233 · Cited by 42
A checklist to publish collections as data in GLAM institutions
Candela, G., Gabriëls, N., Chambers, S., Dobreva, M., Ames, S., Ferriter, M., Fitzgerald, N., Johnston, V. H., Hofmann, K., Hołownia, O., et al. (2023) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-06-2023-0195 · Cited by 34
Sketching AI Concepts with Capabilities and Examples: AI Innovation in the Intensive Care Unit
Yildirim, N., Zlotnikov, S., Sayar, D., Kahn, J. M., Bukowski, L. A., Amin, S. S., Riman, K. A., Davis, B. S., Minturn, J. S., King, A. J., et al. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641896 · Cited by 46
Stroud, A. M., Minteer, S. A., Zhu, X., Ridgeway, J. L., Miller, J. E., & Barry, B. A. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000826 · Cited by 43
CounterFAccTual: How FAccT Undermines Its Organizing Principles
Gansky, B., & McDonald, S. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533241 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K.
- Affiliations
- DAIR Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.09010
- OpenAlex
- W2795038878
- Cited by
- 2,474
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 795 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 298 · 2023: 379 · 2022: 221 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 251.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- dataset documentation, data provenance, data sharing, data reuse, metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
