The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Datasheets for Datasets
Open accessAbstract
The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we propose datasheets for datasets. In the electronics industry, every component, no matter how simple or complex, is accompanied with a datasheet that describes its operating characteristics, test results, recommended uses, and other information. By analogy, we propose that every dataset be accompanied with a datasheet that documents its motivation, composition, collection process, recommended uses, and so on. Datasheets for datasets will facilitate better communication between dataset creators and dataset consumers, and encourage the machine learning community to prioritize transparency and accountability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the electronic hardware industry provides datasheets with detailed characterizations of components' performances under different test conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Datasheets for Data Sets (Gebru et al., 2018) and Model Cards (Mitchell et al., 2019) are two examples of standardized reporting frameworks that may accompany clinical technologies.”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Gebru et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recently, researchers have proposed standardized forms of communicating characteristics of datasets used in machine learning [3, 21, 28] to help users understand the context in which the datasets should be used.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Many mature industries have developed standardized methods of benchmarking various systems under different conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,093
Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments
Huang, G. B., Mattar, M., Berg, T. L., & Miller, E. G. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 4,445
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
(2018) · Cited by 3,510
Self-citationPang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681
Self-citationThe Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. L., & Wormith, J. S. (2005) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128705281756 · Cited by 1,620
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615
The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation
Peltzman, S. (1975) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260352 · Cited by 1,568
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [7][7] Yang Trista Cao and Hal Daumé, III. 2020. Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . -
- [15][15] Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé III, Miroslav Dudík, and Hanna M. Wallach. 2019. Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?. In 2019 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . -
- [26][26] Semih Yagcioglu, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis. 2018. RecipeQA: A Challenge Dataset for Multimodal Comprehension of Cooking Recipes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,008
Fields, J., Chovanec, K., & Madiraju, P. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3349952 · Cited by 188
Ethical and legal challenges of AI in marketing: an exploration of solutions
Kumar, D., & Suthar, N. (2024) · Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-05-2023-0068 · Cited by 180
Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems
Chan, A., Salganik, R., Markelius, A., Pang, C., Rajkumar, N., Krasheninnikov, D., Langosco, L., He, Z., Duan, Y., Carroll, M., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594033 · Cited by 149
REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science
Kapoor, S., Cantrell, E. M., Peng, K., Pham, T. H., Bail, C. A., Gundersen, O. E., Hofman, J. M., Hullman, J. R., Lones, M. A., Malik, M. M., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adk3452 · Cited by 255
Utility is in the Eye of the User: A Critique of NLP Leaderboards
Ethayarajh, K., & Jurafsky, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.393 · Cited by 147
Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches
Mökander, J. (2023) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-023-00074-y · Cited by 152
Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetyPreprint
Leslie, D. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.05684 · Cited by 308
Measuring algorithmically infused societies
Wagner, C., Strohmaier, M., Olteanu, A., Kıcıman, E., Contractor, N., & Eliassi-Rad, T. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03666-1 · Cited by 144
Drukker, K., Chen, W., Gichoya, J. W., Gruszauskas, N. P., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Koyejo, S., Myers, K. J., Sá, R. C., Sahiner, B., Whitney, H. M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.10.6.061104 · Cited by 149
Carobene, A., Padoan, A., Cabitza, F., Banfi, G., & Plebani, M. (2023) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2023-1136 · Cited by 188
The Contestation of Tech Ethics: A Sociotechnical Approach to Technology Ethics in Practice
Green, B. (2021) · Journal of Social Computing · doi:10.23919/jsc.2021.0018 · Cited by 175
Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS
Hendrycks, D., Basart, S., Kadavath, S., Mazeika, M., Arora, A., Guo, E., Burns, C., Puranik, S., He, H., Song, D., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.09938 · Cited by 142
Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systems
Cobbe, J., Lee, M. S. A., & Singh, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445921 · Cited by 150
A survey on bias in visual datasets
Fabbrizzi, S., Papadopoulos, S., Ntoutsi, E., & Kompatsiaris, I. Y. (2022) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103552 · Cited by 164
Z-Inspection ® : A Process to Assess Trustworthy AI
Zicari, R. V., Brodersen, J., Brusseau, J., Dudder, B., Eichhorn, T., Ivanov, T., Kararigas, G., Kringen, P., McCullough, M., Moslein, F., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2021.3066209 · Cited by 134
Operationalising AI Governance through Ethics-Based Auditing: An Industry Case Study
Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00171-7 · Cited by 187
Cooper, A. F., Moss, E., Laufer, B., & Nissenbaum, H. F. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533150 · Cited by 188
Veale, M., & Brass, I. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0006 · Cited by 329
Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and Resolution Techniques
Shahbazi, N., Yin, L., Asudeh, A., & Jagadish, H. V. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3588433 · Cited by 178
Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challenges
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.330 · Cited by 131
XAIR: A Systematic Metareview of Explainable AI (XAI) Aligned to the Software Development Process
Clement, T., Kemmerzell, N., Abdelaal, M., & Amberg, M. (2023) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make5010006 · Cited by 131
Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering
Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Xu, X., Whittle, J., Zowghi, D., & Jacquet, A. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3626234 · Cited by 168
Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches
Weinberg, L. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13196 · Cited by 127
Structural racism in precision medicine: leaving no one behind
Geneviève, L. D., Martani, A., Shaw, D., Elger, B. S., & Wangmo, T. (2020) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-020-0457-8 · Cited by 135
Corporate Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Interest
Cihon, P., Schuett, J., & Baum, S. D. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info12070275 · Cited by 159
Typology of Risks of Generative Text-to-Image Models
Bird, C., Ungless, E., & Kasirzadeh, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604722 · Cited by 121
Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chains
Cobbe, J., Veale, M., & Singh, J. P. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594073 · Cited by 141
Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences
Liao, Q. V., & Varshney, K. R. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.10790 · Cited by 120
Widder, D. G., & Nafus, D. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231177620 · Cited by 119
Shah, C. S., & Bender, E. M. (2022) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3498366.3505816 · Cited by 125
Concealed Data Poisoning Attacks on NLP Models
Wallace, E., Zhao, T., Feng, S., & Singh, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.13 · Cited by 115
(2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.46 · Cited by 115
Uche-Anya, E. N., Anyane‐Yeboa, A., Berzin, T. M., Ghassemi, M., & May, F. P. (2022) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326271 · Cited by 122
Confronting Abusive Language Online: A Survey from the Ethical and Human Rights Perspective
Kiritchenko, S., Nejadgholi, I., & Fraser, K. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12590 · Cited by 126
Morris, M. R. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3356727 · Cited by 114
15 challenges for AI: Or what AI (currently) can’t do
Hagendorff, T., & Wezel, K. (2020) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00886-y · Cited by 113
Jacobs, P. G., Herrero, P., Facchinetti, A., Vehi, J., Kovatchev, B., Breton, M. D., Cinar, A., Nikita, K. S., Doyle, F. J., Bondia, J., et al. (2024) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2023.3331297 · Cited by 113
A toolbox for surfacing health equity harms and biases in large language models
Pfohl, S. R., Cole-Lewis, H., Sayres, R., Neal, D., Asiedu, M., Dieng, A., Tomasev, N., Rashid, Q. M., Azizi, S., Rostamzadeh, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03258-2 · Cited by 113
Xie, J., Sun, L., & Zhao, Y. F. (2025) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2024.04.024 · Cited by 112
Decision Provenance: Harnessing Data Flow for Accountable Systems
Singh, J., Cobbe, J., & Norval, C. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2887201 · Cited by 110
Establishing Data Provenance for Responsible Artificial Intelligence Systems
Werder, K., Ramesh, B., & Zhang, R. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3503488 · Cited by 148
Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI
Álvarez, J. M., Colmenarejo, A. B., Elobaid, A., Fabbrizzi, S., Fahimi, M., Ferrara, A., Ghodsi, S., Mougan, C., Papageorgiou, I. T., Lobo, P. R., et al. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09746-w · Cited by 147
KLUE: Korean Language Understanding EvaluationPreprint
Park, S., Moon, J., Kim, S., Cho, W. I., Han, J., Park, J., Song, C., Kim, J., Song, Y., Oh, T., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.09680 · Cited by 193
Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethics
Wong, R. Y., Madaio, M. A., & Merrill, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579621 · Cited by 135
Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text
Gehrmann, S., Clark, E., & Sellam, T. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13715 · Cited by 123
Efficient Methods for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Treviso, M., Lee, J.-U., Ji, T., van Aken, B., Cao, Q., Ciosici, M. R., Hassid, M., Heafield, K., Hooker, S., Raffel, C., et al. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00577 · Cited by 156
Contestable AI by Design: Towards a Framework
Alfrink, K., Keller, I., Kortuem, G., & Doorn, N. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-022-09611-z · Cited by 169
Anik, A. I., & Bunt, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445736 · Cited by 103
Mylrea, M., & Robinson, N. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25101429 · Cited by 127
Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine LearningPreprint
Jo, E. S., & Gebru, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.10389 · Cited by 102
Self-citationInteractive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentation
Crisan, A., Drouhard, M., Vig, J., & Rajani, N. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533108 · Cited by 101
The Principles of Data-Centric AI
Jarrahi, M. H., Memariani, A., & Guha, S. (2023) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3571724 · Cited by 101
Open-source tools for behavioral video analysis: Setup, methods, and best practices
Luxem, K., Sun, J. J., Bradley, S. P., Krishnan, K., Yttri, E., Zimmermann, J., Pereira, T. D., & Laubach, M. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.79305 · Cited by 98
What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?
Bowman, S. R., & Dahl, G. E. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.385 · Cited by 211
AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers
Sanderson, C., Douglas, D., Lu, Q., Schleiger, E., Whittle, J., Lacey, J., Newnham, G. J., Hajkowicz, S. A., Robinson, C., & Hansen, D. T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2023.3257303 · Cited by 112
A survey on ethical principles of AI and implementations
Zhou, J., Chen, F., Berry, A., Reed, M., Zhang, S., & Savage, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308437 · Cited by 99
Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkits
Deng, W. H., Nagireddy, M., Lee, M. S. A., Singh, J., Wu, Z. S., Holstein, K., & Zhu, H. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533113 · Cited by 99
Geiger, R. S., Cope, D., Ip, J., Lotosh, M., Shah, A., Weng, J., & Tang, R. (2021) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00144 · Cited by 114
Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningPreprint
Ding, F., Hardt, M., Miller, J. A., & Schmidt, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.04884 · Cited by 137
Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges
Wang, Q., Madaio, M., Kane, S. K., Kapania, S., Terry, M. A., & Wilcox, L. G. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581278 · Cited by 110
Synthetic data in biomedicine via generative artificial intelligence
van Breugel, B., Liu, T., Oglić, D., & van der Schaar, M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-024-00245-7 · Cited by 111
Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computing
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., & Basile, V. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i6.25840 · Cited by 114
Labelling instructions matter in biomedical image analysis
Rädsch, T., Reinke, A., Weru, V., Tizabi, M. D., Schreck, N., Kavur, A. E., Pekdemir, B., Roß, T., Kopp‐Schneider, A., & Maier‐Hein, L. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00625-5 · Cited by 90
A large-scale audit of dataset licensing and attribution in AI
Longpre, S., Mahari, R., Chen, A., Obeng-Marnu, N., Sileo, D., Brannon, W., Muennighoff, N., Khazam, N., Kabbara, J., Perisetla, K., et al. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00878-8 · Cited by 248
Overview of leakage scenarios in supervised machine learning
Sasse, L., Nicolaisen‐Sobesky, E., Dukart, J., Eickhoff, S. B., GOETZ, M. A., Hamdan, S., Komeyer, V., Kulkarni, A. J., Lahnakoski, J. M., Love, B. C., et al. (2025) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-025-01193-8 · Cited by 134
Fair Is Better than Sensational: Man Is to Doctor as Woman Is to Doctor
Nissim, M., van Noord, R., & van der Goot, R. (2020) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00379 · Cited by 103
Garcia Santa Cruz, B., Bossa, M. N., Sölter, J., & Husch, A. D. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102225 · Cited by 89
Liao, Q. V., Subramonyam, H., Wang, J., & Vaughan, J. W. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580652 · Cited by 120
Self-citationA Total Error Framework for Digital Traces of Human Behavior on Online Platforms
Sen, I., Flöck, F., Weller, K., Weiß, B., & Wagner, C. (2021) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab018 · Cited by 138
Addressing bias in generative AI: Challenges and research opportunities in information management
Wei, X., Kumar, N., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2025.104103 · Cited by 151
Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary PerspectivePreprint
Bragg, D., Koller, O., Bellard, M., Berke, L., Boudrealt, P., Braffort, A., Caselli, N. K., Huenerfauth, M., Kacorri, H., Verhoef, T., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.08597 · Cited by 87
Chalkidis, I., Fergadiotis, M., & Androutsopoulos, I. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.559 · Cited by 104
A Checklist to Combat Cognitive Biases in Crowdsourcing
Draws, T., Rieger, A., Inel, O., Gadiraju, U., & Tintarev, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v9i1.18939 · Cited by 86
Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAI
Ehsan, U., Saha, K., Choudhury, M. D., & Riedl, M. O. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579467 · Cited by 113
Why ‘open’ AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters
Widder, D. G., Whittaker, M., & West, S. M. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08141-1 · Cited by 86
Ibáñez, J., & Olmeda, M. V. (2021) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01267-0 · Cited by 88
A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines
Priestley, M., O’donnell, F., & Simperl, E. (2023) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3592616 · Cited by 86
Chan, A., Ezell, C., Kaufmann, M., Wei, K., Hammond, L., Bradley, H., Bluemke, E., Rajkumar, N., Krueger, D., Kolt, N., et al. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658948 · Cited by 84
An Action-Oriented AI Policy Toolkit for Technology Audits by Community Advocates and Activists
Krafft, P. M., Young, M., Katell, M. A., Lee, J. E., Narayan, S., Epstein, M., Dailey, D., Herman, B., Tam, A., Guetler, V., et al. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445938 · Cited by 101
Human-centred artificial intelligence: a contextual morality perspective
van Berkel, N., Tag, B., Gonçalves, J., & Hosio, S. J. (2020) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1818828 · Cited by 90
Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioning
Zhao, D., Wang, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01456 · Cited by 85
Learning from data with structured missingness
Mitra, R., McGough, S. F., Chakraborti, T., Holmes, C. C., Copping, R., Hagenbuch, N., Biedermann, S., Noonan, J., Lehmann, B., Shenvi, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00596-z · Cited by 104
SegmentMeIfYouCan: A Benchmark for Anomaly SegmentationPreprint
Chan, R., Lis, K., Uhlemeyer, S., Blum, H., Honari, S., Siegwart, R., Fua, P., Salzmann, M., & Rottmann, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.14812 · Cited by 124
Copyright in generative deep learning
Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2022) · Data & Policy · doi:10.1017/dap.2022.10 · Cited by 82
Modernizing and designing evaluation frameworks for connected sensor technologies in medicine
Coravos, A., Doerr, M., Goldsack, J., Manta, C., Shervey, M., Woods, B., & Wood, W. A. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0237-3 · Cited by 82
Wang, A. Y., Wang, D., Drozdal, J., Muller, M. J., Park, S., Weisz, J. D., Liu, X., Wu, L., & Dugan, C. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3489465 · Cited by 105
Tackling bias in AI health datasets through the STANDING TOGETHER initiative
Ganapathi, S., Palmer, J., Alderman, J. E., Calvert, M., Espinoza, C., Gath, J., Ghassemi, M., Heller, K., Mckay, F., Karthikesalingam, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01987-w · Cited by 82
Chen, J., Wang, D., Shao, Z., Zhang, X., Ruan, M., Li, H., & Li, J. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13092285 · Cited by 103
Stoyanovich, J., Howe, B., & Jagadish, H. V. (2020) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3415478.3415570 · Cited by 89
Markl, N. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533117 · Cited by 100
Public procurement of artificial intelligence systems: new risks and future proofing
Hickok, M. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01572-2 · Cited by 81
Widder, D. G., Zhen, D., Dabbish, L., & Herbsleb, J. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594012 · Cited by 94
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?Preprint
Holstein, K., Vaughan, J. W., Daumé, H., Dudík, M., & Wallach, H. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.05239 · Cited by 81
Self-citationFormalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIPreprint
Jacovi, A., Marasović, A., Miller, T., & Goldberg, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07487 · Cited by 81
Song, D., Vold, A., Madan, K., & Schilder, F. (2021) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2021.101718 · Cited by 88
Naik, K., Goyal, R. K., Foschini, L., Chak, C. M., Thielscher, C., Zhu, H., Lu, J. J.-Q., Lehár, J., Pacanoswki, M. A., Terranova, N., et al. (2023) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.3152 · Cited by 84
Challenges of responsible AI in practice: scoping review and recommended actions
Sadek, M., Kallina, E., Bohné, T., Mougenot, C., Calvo, R. A., & Cave, S. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01880-9 · Cited by 105
A Survey of Human‐Centered Evaluations in Human‐Centered Machine Learning
Sperrle, F., El‐Assady, M., Guo, G., Borgo, R., Chau, D. H., Endert, A., & Keim, D. A. (2021) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.14329 · Cited by 93
Telkamp, J. B., & Anderson, M. H. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05057-6 · Cited by 89
Machine Learning and Bias in Medical Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges
Vrudhula, A., Kwan, A. C., Ouyang, D., & Cheng, S. C. (2024) · Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1161/circimaging.123.015495 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K.
- Affiliations
- DAIR Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.09010
- OpenAlex
- W2795038878
- Cited by
- 2,474
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 795 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 298 · 2023: 379 · 2022: 221 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 251.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- dataset documentation, data provenance, data sharing, data reuse, metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
