The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Datasheets for Datasets
Open accessAbstract
The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we propose datasheets for datasets. In the electronics industry, every component, no matter how simple or complex, is accompanied with a datasheet that describes its operating characteristics, test results, recommended uses, and other information. By analogy, we propose that every dataset be accompanied with a datasheet that documents its motivation, composition, collection process, recommended uses, and so on. Datasheets for datasets will facilitate better communication between dataset creators and dataset consumers, and encourage the machine learning community to prioritize transparency and accountability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the electronic hardware industry provides datasheets with detailed characterizations of components' performances under different test conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Datasheets for Data Sets (Gebru et al., 2018) and Model Cards (Mitchell et al., 2019) are two examples of standardized reporting frameworks that may accompany clinical technologies.”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Gebru et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recently, researchers have proposed standardized forms of communicating characteristics of datasets used in machine learning [3, 21, 28] to help users understand the context in which the datasets should be used.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Many mature industries have developed standardized methods of benchmarking various systems under different conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,093
Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments
Huang, G. B., Mattar, M., Berg, T. L., & Miller, E. G. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 4,445
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
(2018) · Cited by 3,510
Self-citationPang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681
Self-citationThe Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. L., & Wormith, J. S. (2005) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128705281756 · Cited by 1,620
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615
The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation
Peltzman, S. (1975) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260352 · Cited by 1,568
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [7][7] Yang Trista Cao and Hal Daumé, III. 2020. Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . -
- [15][15] Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé III, Miroslav Dudík, and Hanna M. Wallach. 2019. Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?. In 2019 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . -
- [26][26] Semih Yagcioglu, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis. 2018. RecipeQA: A Challenge Dataset for Multimodal Comprehension of Cooking Recipes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A. C., Lo, W.-Y., et al. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00371 · Cited by 11,953
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988
Self-citationLarge language models encode clinical knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 · Cited by 4,083
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681
Self-citationScientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence.
Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2 · Cited by 1,823
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372873 · Cited by 2,245
Self-citationRahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J.-F., Breazeal, C., Crandall, J. W., Christakis, N. A., Couzin, I. D., Jackson, M. O., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y · Cited by 1,364
Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study
Amershi, S., Begel, A., Bird, C., DeLine, R. A., Gall, H. C., Kamar, E. S., Nagappan, N., Nushi, B., & Zimmermann, T. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip.2019.00042 · Cited by 1,401
Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science
Kapoor, S., & Narayanan, A. (2023) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100804 · Cited by 1,387
The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review
Morley, J., Machado, C. C. V., Burr, C., Cowls, J., Joshi, I., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113172 · Cited by 1,105
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9 · Cited by 993
Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00041 · Cited by 854
Ferrara, E. (2023) · Sci · doi:10.3390/sci6010003 · Cited by 875
From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning
Zellers, R., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., & Choi, Y. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00688 · Cited by 769
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review
Kaur, D., Uslu, S., Rittichier, K. J., & Durresi, A. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3491209 · Cited by 709
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D'Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902 · Cited by 687
Machine learning for medical imaging: methodological failures and recommendations for the future
Varoquaux, G. P., & Cheplygina, V. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00592-y · Cited by 815
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 1,245
Lekadir, K., Frangi, A. F., Porras, A. R., Glocker, B., Cintas, C., Langlotz, C. P., Weicken, E., Asselbergs, F. W., Prior, F., Collins, G. S., et al. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-081554 · Cited by 957
Challenges in deploying machine learning: A survey of case studies
Paleyes, A., Urma, R.-G., & Lawrence, N. D. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3533378 · Cited by 638
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations
Ueda, D., Kakinuma, T., Fujita, S., Kamagata, K., Fushimi, Y., Ito, R., Matsui, Y., Nozaki, T., Nakaura, T., Fujima, N., et al. (2024) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3 · Cited by 607
Survey of Explainable AI Techniques in Healthcare
Chaddad, A., Peng, J., Xu, J., & Bouridane, A. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23020634 · Cited by 591
Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering
Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. L. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6 · Cited by 625
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices
Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612
Advances, challenges and opportunities in creating data for trustworthy AI
Liang, W., Tadesse, G. A., Ho, D. E., Fei-Fei, L., Zaharia, M., Zhang, C., & Zou, J. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00516-1 · Cited by 617
Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research
Paullada, A., Raji, I. D., Bender, E. M., Denton, E., & Hanna, A. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100336 · Cited by 548
“For example, a glaring under-representation of darker skinned subjects has been identified within prominent facial analysis datasets [Buolamwini and Gebru, 2018] and the images in object recognition datasets have been overwhelmingly sourced from Western countries [DeVries et al., 2019].”
BackgroundFormalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI
Jacovi, A., Marasović, A., Miller, T., & Goldberg, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445923 · Cited by 545
Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence
Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.1270 · Cited by 548
Understanding the Effect of Accuracy on Trust in Machine Learning Models
Yin, M., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300509 · Cited by 527
Self-citationde Hond, A. A. H., Leeuwenberg, A. M., Hooft, L., Kant, I. M. J., Nijman, S. W. J., van Os, H. J. A., Aardoom, J. J., Debray, T. P. A., Schuit, E., van Smeden, M., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7 · Cited by 499
Schiff, D. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2 · Cited by 489
Preiksaitis, C., & Rose, C. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48785 · Cited by 552
Algorithmic bias in data-driven innovation in the age of AI
Akter, S., McCarthy, G., Sajib, S., Michael, K., Dwivedi, Y. K., D’Ambra, J., & Shen, K. N. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102387 · Cited by 440
Madaio, M. A., Stark, L., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376445 · Cited by 436
Self-citationFactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier's declarations of conformity
Arnold, M., Bellamy, R. K. E., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., Nair, R., Ramamurthy, K. N., Olteanu, A., Piorkowski, D., et al. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2942288 · Cited by 434
Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
Bragg, D., Koller, O., Bellard, M., Berke, L., Boudreault, P., Braffort, A., Caselli, N., Huenerfauth, M., Kacorri, H., Verhoef, T., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3308561.3353774 · Cited by 422
Thieme, A., Belgrave, D., & Doherty, G. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3398069 · Cited by 406
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2020) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 394
The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions
Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2022) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01154-8 · Cited by 384
Munn, L. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w · Cited by 476
Causality matters in medical imaging
Castro, D. C., Walker, I., & Glocker, B. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17478-w · Cited by 364
Santos, T. T., de Souza, L. L., dos Santos, A. A., & Avila, S. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105247 · Cited by 375
Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processing
Lhoest, Q., Villanova del Moral, A., Jernite, Y., Thakur, A., von Platen, P., Patil, S., Chaumond, J., Drame, M., Plu, J., Tunstall, L., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-demo.21 · Cited by 343
“…are being created with a variety of different procedures, from crowd-sourcing to scraping to synthetic generation, which need to be taken into account when evaluating which is most appropriate for a given purpose and ought to be immediately apparent to prospective users (Gebru et al., 2018).”
BackgroundKhan, S. M., Liu, X., Nath, S., Korot, E., Faes, L., Wagner, S. K., Keane, P. A., Sebire, N. J., Burton, M. J., & Denniston, A. K. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30240-5 · Cited by 343
The Effects of Data Quality on Machine Learning Performance on Tabular Data
Mohammed, S., Budach, L., Feuerpfeil, M., Ihde, N., Nathansen, A., Noack, N., Patzlaff, H., Naumann, F., & Harmouch, H. (2025) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2025.102549 · Cited by 331
Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AI
Birhane, A., Isaac, W., Prabhakaran, V., Diaz, M., Elish, M. C., Gabriel, I., & Mohamed, S. (2022) · Equity and Access in Algorithms Mechanisms and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3551624.3555290 · Cited by 330
Health data poverty: an assailable barrier to equitable digital health care
Ibrahim, H., Liu, X., Zariffa, N., Morris, A. D., & Denniston, A. K. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30317-4 · Cited by 326
Inherent Tradeoffs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603197 · Cited by 350
Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus
Dodge, J., Sap, M., Marasović, A., Agnew, W., Ilharco, G., Groeneveld, D., Mitchell, M., & Gardner, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.98 · Cited by 306
Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better
Lee, K., Ippolito, D., Nystrom, A., Zhang, C., Eck, D., Callison-Burch, C., & Carlini, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.577 · Cited by 304
The value of standards for health datasets in artificial intelligence-based applications
Arora, A., Alderman, J. E., Palmer, J., Ganapathi, S., Laws, E., McCradden, M. D., Oakden‐Rayner, L., Pfohl, S. R., Ghassemi, M., McKay, F., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02608-w · Cited by 341
Responsible AI—two frameworks for ethical design practice
Peters, D., Vold, K., Robinson, D., & Calvo, R. A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2020.2974991 · Cited by 293
“Yet, moving effectively from ethical theory and principles into context specific, actionable practice is proving a signifi-cant barrier for the widespread uptake of systematic ethical impact analysis in software engineering [13], [14].”
BackgroundMethodAuditing large language models: a three-layered approach
Mökander, J., Schuett, J., Kirk, H. R., & Floridi, L. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2 · Cited by 289
Causality matters in medical imaging
Castro, D. C., Walker, I. D., & Glocker, B. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 288
Reproducibility in machine learning for health research: Still a ways to go
McDermott, M. B. A., Wang, S., Marinsek, N., Ranganath, R., Foschini, L., & Ghassemi, M. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abb1655 · Cited by 273
Sokol, K., & Flach, P. A. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372870 · Cited by 278
AI Art and its Impact on Artists
Jiang, H. H., Brown, L., Cheng, J., Khan, M., Gupta, A., Workman, D., Hanna, A., Flowers, J., & Gebru, T. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604681 · Cited by 265
Self-citationRoom-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Grounding
Ku, A., Anderson, P., Patel, R., Ie, E., & Baldridge, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.356 · Cited by 274
Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?
Birhane, A., & Prabhu, V. U. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00158 · Cited by 257
Putting AI ethics to work: are the tools fit for purpose?
Ayling, J., & Chapman, A. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00084-x · Cited by 253
Hutchinson, B., Smart, A., Hanna, A., Denton, R., Greer, C., Kjartansson, O., Barnes, P., & Mitchell, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445918 · Cited by 279
Governing AI safety through independent audits
Falco, G., Shneiderman, B., Badger, J., Carrier, R., Dahbura, A., Danks, D., Eling, M., Goodloe, A., Gupta, J., Hart, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00370-7 · Cited by 250
Liu, X., Glocker, B., McCradden, M. M., Ghassemi, M., Denniston, A. K., & Oakden-Rayner, L. (2022) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00003-6 · Cited by 266
Interpretable Machine Learning
Boehmke, B., & Greenwell, B. (2019) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367816377-16 · Cited by 276
Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Results
Dodge, J., Gururangan, S., Card, D., Schwartz, R., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1224 · Cited by 233
Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond
Sambasivan, N., Arnesen, E., Hutchinson, B., Doshi, T., & Prabhakaran, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445896 · Cited by 228
What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research Landscape
Capel, T., & Brereton, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580959 · Cited by 228
Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Bhatt, U., Antorán, J., Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., Sattigeri, P., Fogliato, R., Melançon, G., Krishnan, R., Stanley, J., Tickoo, O., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462571 · Cited by 300
MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge ModelsPreprint
Zellers, R., Lu, X., Hessel, J., Yu, Y., Park, J. S., Cao, J., Farhadi, A., & Choi, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02636 · Cited by 239
Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems
Lavin, A., Lee, C. M., Visnjic, A., Ganju, S., Newman, D. J., Ganguly, S., Lange, D., Baydin, A. G., Sharma, A., Gibson, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33128-9 · Cited by 247
Nasarian, E., Alizadehsani, R., Acharya, U. R., & Tsui, K.-L. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102412 · Cited by 207
Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
Ganguli, D., Hernandez, D., Lovitt, L., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Conerly, T., Dassarma, N., Drain, D., Elhage, N., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533229 · Cited by 207
Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models
Schramowski, P., Brack, M., Deiseroth, B., & Kersting, K. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02157 · Cited by 219
Malgaroli, M., Hull, T. D., Zech, J. M., & Althoff, T. (2023) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02592-2 · Cited by 226
Chan, B., Schweter, S., & Möller, T. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.598 · Cited by 249
The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review
Wallace, W. J., Chan, C., Chidambaram, S., Hanna, L., Iqbal, F. M., Acharya, A., Normahani, P., Ashrafian, H., Markar, S. R., Sounderajah, V., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00667-w · Cited by 213
Giray, G. (2021) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2021.111031 · Cited by 187
DiffusionDB: A Large-scale Prompt Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Image Generative Models
Wang, Z. J., Montoya, E., Munechika, D., Yang, H., Hoover, B., & Chau, D. H. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.51 · Cited by 464
Alderman, J. E., Palmer, J., Laws, E., McCradden, M. D., Ordish, J., Ghassemi, M., Pfohl, S. R., Rostamzadeh, N., Cole-Lewis, H. J., Glocker, B., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00224-3 · Cited by 216
AI-driven healthcare: A review on ensuring fairness and mitigating bias
Chinta, S. V., Wang, Z., Palikhe, A., Zhang, X., Kashif, A., Smith, M. A., Liu, J., & Zhang, W. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000864 · Cited by 268
Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets
Kreutzer, J., Caswell, I., Wang, L., Wahab, A., van Esch, D., Ulzii-Orshikh, N., Tapo, A., Subramani, N., Sokolov, A., Sikasote, C., et al. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00447 · Cited by 179
Ethics by design for artificial intelligence
Brey, P. A. E., & Dainow, B. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00330-4 · Cited by 141
(2019) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372862 · Cited by 167
Aligning AI With Shared Human Values
Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., Critch, A., Li, J., Song, D., & Steinhardt, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02275 · Cited by 517
CBLUE: A Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark
Zhang, N., Chen, M., Bi, Z., Liang, X., Li, L., Shang, X., Yin, K., Tan, C., Xu, J., Huang, F., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.544 · Cited by 185
QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension
Rogers, A., Gardner, M., & Augenstein, I. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560260 · Cited by 213
The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review
Schwabe, D., Becker, K., Seyferth, M., Klaß, A., & Schaeffter, T. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01196-4 · Cited by 169
Algorithmic realism: expanding the boundaries of algorithmic thought
Green, B., & Viljoen, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372840 · Cited by 161
MERLOT RESERVE: Neural Script Knowledge through Vision and Language and Sound
Zellers, R., Lu, J., Lu, X., Yu, Y., Zhao, Y., Salehi, M., Kusupati, A., Hessel, J., Farhadi, A., & Choi, Y. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01589 · Cited by 179
Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biases
Steed, R., & Caliskan, A. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445932 · Cited by 189
The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metrics
Gehrmann, S., Adewumi, T., Aggarwal, K., Ammanamanchi, P. S., Aremu, A., Bosselut, A., Chandu, K. R., Clinciu, M.-A., Das, D., Dhole, K., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics (GEM 2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.gem-1.10 · Cited by 159
Use of artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities and obstacles
Pinsky, M. R., Bedoya, A., Bihorac, A., Celi, L., Churpek, M., Economou-Zavlanos, N. J., Elbers, P., Saria, S., Liu, V., Lyons, P. G., et al. (2024) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-024-04860-z · Cited by 160
Operationalising ethics in artificial intelligence for healthcare: a framework for AI developers
Solanki, P., Grundy, J., & Hussain, W. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00195-z · Cited by 157
“The full documentation processes are outlined in [45, 164] for ML datasets, and in [110, 111] for NLP data.”
BackgroundMethodVision-Language Pre-Training: Basics, Recent Advances, and Future Trends
Gan, Z., Li, L., Li, C., Wang, L., Liu, Z., & Gao, J. (2022) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000105 · Cited by 155
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Neuroscience: Behavioral Neurostimulation
Fellous, J., Sapiro, G., Rossi, A. F., Mayberg, H., & Ferrante, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01346 · Cited by 165
Legalbench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
Guha, N., Nyarko, J., Ho, D. E., Ré, C., Chilton, A., Narayana, A., Chohlas-Wood, A., Peters, A., Waldon, B., Rockmore, D., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4583531 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K.
- Affiliations
- DAIR Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.09010
- OpenAlex
- W2795038878
- Cited by
- 2,474
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 795 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 298 · 2023: 379 · 2022: 221 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 251.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- dataset documentation, data provenance, data sharing, data reuse, metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
