The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Datasheets for Datasets
Open accessAbstract
The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we propose datasheets for datasets. In the electronics industry, every component, no matter how simple or complex, is accompanied with a datasheet that describes its operating characteristics, test results, recommended uses, and other information. By analogy, we propose that every dataset be accompanied with a datasheet that documents its motivation, composition, collection process, recommended uses, and so on. Datasheets for datasets will facilitate better communication between dataset creators and dataset consumers, and encourage the machine learning community to prioritize transparency and accountability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the electronic hardware industry provides datasheets with detailed characterizations of components' performances under different test conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Datasheets for Data Sets (Gebru et al., 2018) and Model Cards (Mitchell et al., 2019) are two examples of standardized reporting frameworks that may accompany clinical technologies.”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Gebru et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recently, researchers have proposed standardized forms of communicating characteristics of datasets used in machine learning [3, 21, 28] to help users understand the context in which the datasets should be used.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Many mature industries have developed standardized methods of benchmarking various systems under different conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,093
Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments
Huang, G. B., Mattar, M., Berg, T. L., & Miller, E. G. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 4,445
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
(2018) · Cited by 3,510
Self-citationPang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681
Self-citationThe Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. L., & Wormith, J. S. (2005) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128705281756 · Cited by 1,620
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615
The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation
Peltzman, S. (1975) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260352 · Cited by 1,568
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [7][7] Yang Trista Cao and Hal Daumé, III. 2020. Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . -
- [15][15] Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé III, Miroslav Dudík, and Hanna M. Wallach. 2019. Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?. In 2019 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . -
- [26][26] Semih Yagcioglu, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis. 2018. RecipeQA: A Challenge Dataset for Multimodal Comprehension of Cooking Recipes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,008
Ecosystem Graphs: The Social Footprint of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Soylu, D., Liao, T., Creel, K., & Liang, P. (2023) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2961271/v1 · Cited by 14
Knowledge Workers' Perspectives on AI Training for Responsible AI Use
Zhang, A., & Lee, M. K. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714100 · Cited by 19
Examining the Expanding Role of Synthetic Data Throughout the AI Development Pipeline
Kapania, S., Ballard, S. A., Kessler, A., & Vaughan, J. W. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732005 · Cited by 19
Self-citationSurvey on the Evaluation of Generative Models in Music
Lerch, A., Arthur, C., Bryan–Kinns, N., Ford, C., Sun, Q., & Vinay, A. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3769106 · Cited by 15
An HCAI Methodological Framework: Putting it Into Action to Enable Human-Centered AI
Xu, W., Gao, Z., & Dainoff, M. J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2025.3631590 · Cited by 92
Deep learning in acute vertigo diagnosis
Rastall, D. P. W., & Green, K. E. (2022) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2022.120454 · Cited by 13
Analysis: Flawed Datasets of Monkeypox Skin Images
Vega, C., Schneider, R., & Satagopam, V. (2023) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-023-01928-1 · Cited by 15
Pradhan, S. K., Heyn, H.-M., & Knauss, E. (2023) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-023-09622-8 · Cited by 13
What’s the Meaning of Superhuman Performance in Today’s NLU?
Tedeschi, S., Bos, J., Declerck, T., Hajič, J., Hershcovich, D., Hovy, E. H., Koller, A., Krek, S., Schockaert, S., Sennrich, R., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.697 · Cited by 25
Alderman, J. E., Charalambides, M., Sachdeva, G. S., Laws, E., Palmer, J., Lee, E., Menon, V., Malik, Q., Vadera, S., Calvert, M., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00146-8 · Cited by 15
Auditing Flood Vulnerability Geo-Intelligence Workflow for Biases
Masinde, B. K., Gevaert, C. M., Nagenborg, M., den Homberg, M. J. C. V., Margutti, J., Gortzak, I., & Zevenbergen, J. A. (2024) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi13120419 · Cited by 14
AI Development for the Public Interest: From Abstraction Traps to Sociotechnical Risks
Andrus, M., Dean, S., Gilbert, T. K., Lambert, N., & Zick, T. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas50296.2020.9462193 · Cited by 15
It’s the Meaning That Counts: The State of the Art in NLP and Semantics
Hershcovich, D., & Donatelli, L. E. (2021) · Künstliche Intell. · doi:10.1007/s13218-021-00726-6 · Cited by 16
Designing a Risk Assessment Tool for Artificial Intelligence Systems
Nagbøl, P. R., Müller, O., & Krancher, O. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_32 · Cited by 13
Artificial Intelligence Project Success Factors: Moral Decision-Making with Algorithms
Miller, G. J. (2021) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2021f26 · Cited by 16
MS-Mentions: Consistently Annotating Entity Mentions in Materials Science Procedural Text
O’Gorman, T., Jensen, Z., Mysore, S., Huang, K., Mahbub, R., Olivetti, E., & McCallum, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.101 · Cited by 14
Chandrasekhar, R., Utts, J. M., Cohen, A. I., & Hayat, M. J. (2022) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2022.2156612 · Cited by 13
Biases, Fairness, and Implications of Using AI in Social Media Data Mining
Anzum, F., Asha, A. Z., & Gavrilova, M. L. (2022) · International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW) · doi:10.1109/cw55638.2022.00056 · Cited by 14
Towards Traceability in Data Ecosystems using a Bill of Materials ModelPreprint
Barclay, I., Preece, A. D., Taylor, I., & Verma, D. C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.04253 · Cited by 13
Non-portability of Algorithmic Fairness in IndiaPreprint
Sambasivan, N., Arnesen, E., Hutchinson, B., & Prabhakaran, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03659 · Cited by 13
Fairness and Discrimination in Information Access SystemsPreprint
Ekstrand, M. D., Das, A., Burke, R., & Díaz, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 13
SoK: Machine Learning GovernancePreprint
Chandrasekaran, V., Jia, H., Thudi, A., Travers, A., Yaghini, M., & Papernot, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.10870 · Cited by 33
Burr, C., & Leslie, D. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3937983 · Cited by 13
The Debate on the Ethics of AI in Health Care: a Reconstruction and Critical ReviewPreprint
Morley, J. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/n7y2g · Cited by 12
Speaking of accent: A content analysis of accent misconceptions in ASR research
Prinos, K., Patwari, N., & Power, C. A. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658969 · Cited by 12
The Development Landscape of Large Language Models for Biomedical Applications
Cao, Z., Keloth, V. K., Xie, Q., Qian, L., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Shi, R., Zhou, W., Yang, G. F., Zhang, J., et al. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-102224-074736 · Cited by 16
Li, Y., & Goel, S. (2025) · Advances in Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2025.100842 · Cited by 21
Navigating the future of artificial intelligence technologies for improving the care of older adults
Abadir, M., Dineen, W., Myers, D., Yu, S., & Phan, P. (2025) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igaf092 · Cited by 13
Disentangling the Components of Ethical Research in Machine Learning
Ashurst, C., Barocas, S., Campbell, R., & Raji, I. D. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533781 · Cited by 17
Stakeholder-accountability model for artificial intelligence projects
Maxmetrics, H., & Miller, G. J. (2022) · Journal of Economics and Management · doi:10.22367/jem.2022.44.18 · Cited by 13
Meiser, M., & Zinnikus, I. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17091992 · Cited by 16
Lazy Data Practices Harm Fairness Research
Simson, J., Fabris, A., & Kern, C. A. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658931 · Cited by 13
Machine learning data practices through a data curation lens: An evaluation framework
Bhardwaj, E., Gujral, H., Wu, S., Zogheib, C., Maharaj, T., & Becker, C. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658955 · Cited by 22
A comprehensive review of techniques for documenting artificial intelligence
Königstorfer, F. (2024) · Digital Policy Regulation and Governance · doi:10.1108/dprg-01-2024-0008 · Cited by 15
Constructing Capabilities: The Politics of Testing Infrastructures for Generative AI
Grill, G. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659009 · Cited by 18
Building Guardrails in AI Systems with Threat Modeling
Dev, J., Akhuseyinoglu, N. B., Kayas, G., Rashidi, B., & Garg, V. (2024) · Digital Government Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3674845 · Cited by 15
Nullius in Explanans: an ethical risk assessment for explainable AI
Nannini, L., Huyskes, D., Panai, E., Pistilli, G., & Tartaro, A. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09800-7 · Cited by 16
The Venus score for the assessment of the quality and trustworthiness of biomedical datasets
Chicco, D., Fabris, A., & Jurman, G. (2025) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/s13040-024-00412-x · Cited by 16
Navigating AI conformity: A design framework to assess fairness, explainability, and performance
von Zahn, M., Zacharias, J., Lowin, M., Chen, J., & Hinz, O. F. (2025) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-025-00770-2 · Cited by 14
AI Mismatches: Identifying Potential Algorithmic Harms Before AI Development
Saxena, D., Jung, J.-Y., Forlizzi, J., Holstein, K., & Zimmerman, J. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714098 · Cited by 25
Pneuma : Leveraging LLMs for Tabular Data Representation and Retrieval in an End-to-End System
Balaka, M. I. L., Alexander, D., Wang, Q., Gong, Y., Krisnadhi, A. A., & Fernandez, R. C. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3725337 · Cited by 30
What Machine Learning Can Learn From Software Modularity
Kriens, P., & Verbelen, T. (2022) · Computer · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.10366 · Cited by 15
Deo, S., & Sontakke, N. (2021) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2021.3076851 · Cited by 12
School Choice Algorithms: Data Infrastructures, Automation, and Inequality
Swist, T., & Gulson, K. Ν. (2022) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-022-00334-z · Cited by 12
Time to audit your AI algorithms
Sandu, I., Wiersma, M., & Manichand, D. (2022) · Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie · doi:10.5117/mab.96.90108 · Cited by 12
Jin, Z., Wang, X., Cheng, F., Sun, C., Liu, Q., & Qu, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3236380 · Cited by 12
MLTEing Models: Negotiating, Evaluating, and Documenting Model and System Qualities
Maffey, K. R., Dotterrer, K., Niemann, J., Cruickshank, I. J., Lewis, G. A., & Kästner, C. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER) · doi:10.1109/icse-nier58687.2023.00012 · Cited by 10
InterroLang: Exploring NLP Models and Datasets through Dialogue-based Explanations
Feldhus, N., Wang, Q., Anikina, T., Chopra, S., Oguz, C., & Möller, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.359 · Cited by 15
Chavan, V., Koch, P., Schlüter, M., & Briese, C. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01057 · Cited by 12
Assessing Quality of Surgical Real-World Data from an Automated Electronic Health Record Pipeline
Corey, K., Helmkamp, J. K., Simons, M. G., Curtis, L. H., Marsolo, K. A., Balu, S., Gao, M. C., Nichols, M., Watson, J. A., Mureebe, L., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.005 · Cited by 13
AI and Holistic Review: Informing Human Reading in College AdmissionsPreprint
Alvero, A., Arthurs, N., antonio, A. L., Domingue, B. W., Gebre-Medhin, B., Giebel, S., & Stevens, M. L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.09318 · Cited by 12
Customizing Triggers with Concealed Data Poisoning.Preprint
Wallace, E., Zhao, T. Z., Feng, S., & Singh, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 12
Pitfalls in Machine Learning Research: Reexamining the Development CyclePreprint
Biderman, S., & Scheirer, W. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.02832 · Cited by 19
Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and ChallengesPreprint
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.04054 · Cited by 12
Benchmarking Multimodal AutoML for Tabular Data with Text FieldsPreprint
Shi, X., Mueller, J. W., Erickson, N., Li, M., & Smola, A. J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02705 · Cited by 29
Trustworthy AI for safe medicines
Stegmann, J., Littlebury, R., Trengove, M., Goetz, L., Bate, A., & Branson, K. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-023-00769-4 · Cited by 12
Daneshjou, R., & Kittler, H. (2023) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2023.11.011 · Cited by 12
AI Model Passport: Data and system traceability framework for transparent AI in health
Kalokyri, V., Tachos, N. S., Kalantzopoulos, C., Sfakianakis, S. G., Kondylakis, H., Zaridis, D. I., Colantonio, S., Regge, D., Papanikolaou, N. K., Kostas Marias, A., et al. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.041 · Cited by 11
Vo, T. H., & Le, N. Q. K. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag227 · Cited by 12
Exploring Social Biases of Large Language Models in a College Artificial Intelligence Course
Kolisko, S., & Anderson, C. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i13.26879 · Cited by 12
Ilager, S., Toosi, A. N., Jha, M. R., Brandić, I., & Buyya, R. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC) · doi:10.1145/3603166.3632137 · Cited by 11
Tan, M., Lee, H., Wang, D., & Subramonyam, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637358 · Cited by 14
Gausen, A., Mitra, B., & Lindley, S. E. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658900 · Cited by 18
Understanding Disparities in Post Hoc Machine Learning Explanation
Mhasawade, V., Rahman, S., Haskell-Craig, Z., & Chunara, R. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659043 · Cited by 14
Ummenhofer, B., Agrawal, S., Sepulveda, R., Lao, Y., Zhang, K., Cheng, T., Richter, S. R., Wang, S., & Ros, G. (2024) · International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv62453.2024.00097 · Cited by 11
Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a responsible data science workflow
Stoudt, S., Jernite, Y., Marshall, B., Marwick, B., Sharan, M., Whitaker, K., & Danchev, V. (2024) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012232 · Cited by 11
Tran, M. H., & Fiesler, C. L. (2024) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/3632620.3671109 · Cited by 11
Jiang, S., Ashar, P., Shandhi, M. M. H., & Dunn, J. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00170-5 · Cited by 11
Pelekis, S., Karakolis, E., Lampropoulos, G., Mouzakitis, S., Markaki, O. I., Ntanos, C., & Askounis, D. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) · doi:10.1109/ice/itmc61926.2024.10794222 · Cited by 14
How can we make sound replication decisions?
Davis‐Stober, C. P., Sarafoglou, A., Aczél, B., Chandramouli, S., Errington, T. M., Field, S. M., Fishbach, A., Freire, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Oberauer, K., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2401236121 · Cited by 13
Kwao, L., Yang, Y., Zou, J., & Ma, J. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.70001 · Cited by 16
Fahad, S. K. A., Zhengkui, D. W., Ng, P. C., Wong, N., Ng, A. B., & See, S. C. W. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80334-5_19 · Cited by 13
Towards Fairness in AI for Melanoma Detection: Systemic Review and Recommendations
Montoya, L. N., Roberts, J. S., & Hidalgo, B. S. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84460-7_21 · Cited by 14
Promoting transparency in AI for biomedical and behavioral research
Hernandez‐Boussard, T., Lee, A., Stoyanovich, J., & Biven, L. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03680-0 · Cited by 11
Leashes, not guardrails: A management‐based approach to artificial intelligence risk regulation
Coglianese, C., & Crum, C. R. (2025) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.70020 · Cited by 16
Mahajan, K., & Shaikh, S. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.sigdial-1.36 · Cited by 12
Omena, J. J., Pilipets, E., Universität Klagenfurt, D. D. M. Y. C., Gobbo, B., Jason, C., & Universität Siegen, C. C. D. I. “. D. C. (2021) · Revista Diseña · doi:10.7764/disena.19.article.1 · Cited by 11
Reflections and Considerations on Running Creative Visualization Learning Activities
Roberts, J. C., Bach, B., Boucher, M., Chevalier, F., Diehl, A., Hinrichs, U., Huron, S., Kirk, A., Knudsen, S., Meirelles, I., et al. (2022) · HAL · Cited by 11
Trust and Transparency in Contact Tracing ApplicationsPreprint
Hobson, S. F., Hind, M., Mojsilović, A., & Varshney, K. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11356 · Cited by 11
Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training DataPreprint
Rolf, E., Worledge, T., Recht, B., & Jordan, M. I. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03399 · Cited by 11
Adversarial Machine Learning and Cybersecurity
Musser, M. (2023) · doi:10.51593/2022ca003 · Cited by 11
Auditing the Audits: Lessons for Algorithmic Accountability from Local Law 144's Bias Audits
Gerchick, M. K., Encarnación, R., Tanigawa-Lau, C., Armstrong, L., Gutiérrez, A., & Metaxa, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732004 · Cited by 10
Ramos, F. (2025) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws14060084 · Cited by 21
Research Reproducibility as a Survival Analysis
Raff, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i1.16124 · Cited by 9
Socially meaningful transparency in data-based systems: reflections and proposals from practice
Bates, J., Kennedy, H., Medina-Perea, I., Oman, S., & Pinney, L. (2023) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-01-2023-0006 · Cited by 14
A Siren Song of Open Source Reproducibility, Examples from Machine Learning
Raff, E., & Farris, A. (2023) · ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability (ACM REP) · doi:10.1145/3589806.3600042 · Cited by 23
Automatic Histograms: Leveraging Language Models for Text Dataset Exploration
Reif, E., Qian, C., Wexler, J., & Kahng, M. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3650798 · Cited by 10
Mapping AI ethics: a meso-scale analysis of its charters and manifestos
Gornet, M., Delarue, S., Boritchev, M., & Viard, T. (2024) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658545 · Cited by 8
Towards Unlocking the Hidden Potentials of the Data-Centric AI Paradigm in the Modern Era
Majeed, A., & Hwang, S. O. (2024) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi7040054 · Cited by 10
Hatherley, J. J. (2024) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2024-109905 · Cited by 10
Liu, K., & Altman, R. B. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-094844 · Cited by 14
Biases in machine-learning models of human single-cell data
Willem, T., Shitov, V. A., Luecken, M. D., Kilbertus, N., Bauer, S., Piraud, M., Buyx, A., & Theis, F. J. (2025) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-025-01619-8 · Cited by 12
Uncovering the gap: challenging the agential nature of AI responsibility problems
Albareda, J. L. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00685-w · Cited by 13
Sakurada, L., la Prieta, F. D., & Leitão, P. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3586716 · Cited by 10
Radha, S. K., Kuehlkamp, A., & Nabrzyski, J. (2025) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3768151 · Cited by 10
The ADePT framework for assessing autonomous laboratory robotics
Villacis, P. J. S., & Benyahia, B. (2026) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-026-01932-9 · Cited by 17
Ethical and Socially-Aware Data Labels
Beretta, E., Vetrò, A., Lepri, B., & De Martin, J. C. (2019) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11680-4_30 · Cited by 6
Hirmer, S. A., Leonard, A., Tumwesige, J., & Conforti, C. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.186 · Cited by 14
Analytical modelling and UK Government policy
Oldfield, M., & Haig, E. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00078-9 · Cited by 10
Heidenreich, H. S., & Williams, J. R. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462578 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K.
- Affiliations
- DAIR Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.09010
- OpenAlex
- W2795038878
- Cited by
- 2,474
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 795 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 298 · 2023: 379 · 2022: 221 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 251.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- dataset documentation, data provenance, data sharing, data reuse, metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
