The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Datasheets for Datasets
Open accessAbstract
The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we propose datasheets for datasets. In the electronics industry, every component, no matter how simple or complex, is accompanied with a datasheet that describes its operating characteristics, test results, recommended uses, and other information. By analogy, we propose that every dataset be accompanied with a datasheet that documents its motivation, composition, collection process, recommended uses, and so on. Datasheets for datasets will facilitate better communication between dataset creators and dataset consumers, and encourage the machine learning community to prioritize transparency and accountability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the electronic hardware industry provides datasheets with detailed characterizations of components' performances under different test conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Datasheets for Data Sets (Gebru et al., 2018) and Model Cards (Mitchell et al., 2019) are two examples of standardized reporting frameworks that may accompany clinical technologies.”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Gebru et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recently, researchers have proposed standardized forms of communicating characteristics of datasets used in machine learning [3, 21, 28] to help users understand the context in which the datasets should be used.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Many mature industries have developed standardized methods of benchmarking various systems under different conditions.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,093
Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments
Huang, G. B., Mattar, M., Berg, T. L., & Miller, E. G. (2008) · HAL · Cited by 4,445
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
(2018) · Cited by 3,510
Self-citationPang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681
Self-citationThe Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. L., & Wormith, J. S. (2005) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128705281756 · Cited by 1,620
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615
The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation
Peltzman, S. (1975) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260352 · Cited by 1,568
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [7][7] Yang Trista Cao and Hal Daumé, III. 2020. Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . -
- [15][15] Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé III, Miroslav Dudík, and Hanna M. Wallach. 2019. Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?. In 2019 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . -
- [26][26] Semih Yagcioglu, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, and Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis. 2018. RecipeQA: A Challenge Dataset for Multimodal Comprehension of Cooking Recipes. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,008
Stroud, A. M., Anzabi, M. D., Wise, J. L., Barry, B. A., Malik, M. M., McGowan, M. L., & Sharp, R. R. (2024) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.100189 · Cited by 25
Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603209 · Cited by 21
Identifying Bias in AI using SimulationPreprint
McDuff, D., Cheng, R., & Kapoor, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.00471 · Cited by 31
Dulhanty, C., & Wong, A. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.01347 · Cited by 40
A Total Error Framework for Digital Traces of HumansPreprint
Sen, I., Flöck, F., Weller, K., Weiß, B., & Wagner, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 20
Question-Driven Design Process for Explainable AI User Experiences
Liao, Q. V., Pribić, M., Han, J., Miller, S., & Sow, D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.03483 · Cited by 18
What is research data “misuse”? And how can it be prevented or mitigated?
Pasquetto, I. V., Cullen, Z., Thomer, A. K., & Wofford, M. F. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24944 · Cited by 21
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Marketing: The Invisible Danger of AI Hallucinations
Yaprak, B. (2024) · Journal of Economy Business and Management · doi:10.7596/jebm.1588897 · Cited by 19
Fiske, A., Blacker, S., Geneviève, L. D., Willem, T., Fritzsche, M.-C., Buyx, A., Celi, L. A., & McLennan, S. (2025) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.01.003 · Cited by 21
Balayn, A., Yurrita, M., Rancourt, F., Casati, F., & Gadiraju, U. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713787 · Cited by 37
Detecting Fine-Grained Cross-Lingual Semantic Divergences without Supervision by Learning to Rank
Briakou, E., & Carpuat, M. J. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.121 · Cited by 23
“It’s Like the Value System in the Loop”: Domain Experts’ Values Expectations for NLP Automation
Showkat, D., & Baumer, E. P. S. (2022) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3532106.3533483 · Cited by 21
Nanosensor Location Estimation in the Human Circulatory System Using Machine Learning
Gómez, J. T., Kuestner, A., Simonjan, J., Unluturk, B. D., & Dressler, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · doi:10.1109/tnano.2022.3217653 · Cited by 17
Pinney, C., Raj, A., Hanna, A., & Ekstrand, M. D. (2023) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3576840.3578316 · Cited by 17
Scheuerman, M. K., Weathington, K., Mugunthan, T., Denton, E., & Fiesler, C. L. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579488 · Cited by 20
We are the Data: Challenges and Opportunities for Creating Demographically Diverse Anthropographics
Dhawka, P., He, H. A., & Willett, W. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581086 · Cited by 17
Representation in AI Evaluations
Bergman, A. S., Hendricks, L. A., Rauh, M., Wú, B., Agnew, W. S., Kunesch, M., Duan, I., Gabriel, I., & Isaac, W. S. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594019 · Cited by 20
Examining How Students Code with Socioscientific Data to Tell Stories About Climate Change
Sanei, H., Kahn, J. B., Yalcinkaya, R., Jiang, S., & Wang, C. (2023) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10054-z · Cited by 17
Mind The Gap: Designers and Standards on Algorithmic System Transparency for Users
Schor, B. G. S., Norval, C., Charlesworth, E., & Singh, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642531 · Cited by 17
Chen, C., & Sundar, S. S. (2024) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2024.2392494 · Cited by 19
Havrda, M., & Rakova, B. (2020) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283137 · Cited by 17
Getting into the engine room: a blueprint to investigate the shadowy steps of AI ethics
Rochel, J., & Évéquoz, F. (2020) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01069-w · Cited by 13
Machine Learning Model Cards Transparency Review : Using model card toolkit
Wadhwani, A., & Jain, P. (2020) · IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon) · doi:10.1109/punecon50868.2020.9362382 · Cited by 19
Boenisch, F., Battis, V., Buchmann, N., & Poikela, M. E. (2021) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3473856.3473869 · Cited by 17
An Algorithmic Framework for Bias Bounties
Globus-Harris, I., Kearns, M. J., & Roth, A. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533172 · Cited by 17
What's in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpus
Luccioni, A. S., & Viviano, J. D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.02732 · Cited by 17
ChoCo: a Chord Corpus and a Data Transformation Workflow for Musical Harmony Knowledge Graphs
de Berardinis, J., Meroño-Peñuela, A., Poltronieri, A., & Valentina Presutti, A. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02410-w · Cited by 17
Chen, C., Liao, M., & Sundar, S. S. (2024) · International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) · doi:10.1145/3686038.3686066 · Cited by 20
Show Me the Work: Fact-Checkers' Requirements for Explainable Automated Fact-Checking
Warren, G., Shklovski, I., & Augenstein, I. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713277 · Cited by 34
Creative Writers' Attitudes on Writing as Training Data for Large Language Models
Gero, K. I., Desai, M., Schnitzler, C., Eom, N., Cushman, J., & Glassman, E. L. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713287 · Cited by 16
Larsen, B. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462591 · Cited by 20
Toward a taxonomy of trust for probabilistic machine learning
Broderick, T., Gelman, A., Meager, R., Smith, A. L., & Zheng, T. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn3999 · Cited by 19
Naja, I., Marković, M., Edwards, P. J., Pang, W., Cottrill, C., & Williams, R. A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3188967 · Cited by 19
Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People
Kamikubo, R., Lee, K., & Kacorri, H. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581337 · Cited by 21
Hernández, A. D., Owen, R., Nielsen, D. S., & McConville, R. (2023) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2023.2222514 · Cited by 16
Grusky, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.107 · Cited by 16
Fairness and Bias in Robot Learning
Londoño, L., Hurtado, J. V., Hertz, N., Kellmeyer, P., Vöeneky, S., & Valada, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2024.3403898 · Cited by 43
A Data-Centric AI Paradigm for Socio-Industrial and Global Challenges
Majeed, A., & Hwang, S. O. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13112156 · Cited by 16
Li, J., Hu, X., Lucic, A., Wu, Y., Condotta, I. C. F. D. S., Dilger, R. N., Ahuja, N., & Green-Miller, A. R. (2024) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.jia.2024.08.014 · Cited by 21
Hadar‐Shoval, D., Haber, Y., Tal, A., Simon, T., Elyoseph, T., & Elyoseph, Z. (2024) · JMIR Neurotechnology · doi:10.2196/64182 · Cited by 23
Masader: Metadata Sourcing for Arabic Text and Speech Data Resources
Alyafeai, Z., Masoud, M., Ghaleb, M., & Al-shaibani, M. S. (2022) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/3rot2sy5uudb · Cited by 16
Method cards for prescriptive machine-learning transparency
Adkins, D., Alsallakh, B., Cheema, A., Kokhlikyan, N., McReynolds, E., Mishra, P., Procope, C., Sawruk, J., Wang, E., & Zvyagina, P. (2022) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) · doi:10.1145/3522664.3528600 · Cited by 16
Mix & Match Machine Learning: An Ideation Toolkit to Design Machine Learning-Enabled Solutions
Jansen, A., & Colombo, S. (2023) · International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI) · doi:10.1145/3569009.3572739 · Cited by 16
Ethical considerations in the early detection of Alzheimer's disease using speech and AI
Petti, U., Nyrup, R., Skopek, J. M., & Korhonen, A. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594063 · Cited by 16
Ordun, C. Y., Raff, E., & Purushotham, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13016/m2blek-cjvs · Cited by 24
A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021)Preprint
Talat, Z., Blix, H., Valvoda, J., Ganesh, M. I., Cotterell, R., & Williams, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.04158 · Cited by 38
Duolingo English Test Responsible AI Standards
Burstein, J. C. (2023) · doi:10.46999/vcae5025 · Cited by 16
Kelan, E. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003427100 · Cited by 19
HCI and Older Adults: The Critical Turn and What Comes Next
Lazar, A., Brewer, R. N., & Knowles, B. (2025) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000094 · Cited by 16
Policy-as-Prompt: Rethinking Content Moderation in the Age of Large Language Models
Palla, K., Redondo-García, J. L., Hauff, C., Fabbri, F., Damianou, A., Lindström, H., Taber, D., & Lalmas, M. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732054 · Cited by 41
#PraCegoVer: A Large Dataset for Image Captioning in Portuguese
dos Santos, G. O., Colombini, E. L., & Avila, S. (2022) · Data · doi:10.3390/data7020013 · Cited by 18
Chen, J., Lin, W.-C., Yang, S., Chiang, M. F., & Hribar, M. R. (2022) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.11.11.20 · Cited by 16
The Ethics of Computational Social Science
Leslie, D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_4 · Cited by 18
Fairness metrics for health AI: we have a long way to go
Mbakwe, A. B., Lourentzou, I., Celi, L. A., & Wu, J. T.-Y. (2023) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104525 · Cited by 15
Face Work: A Human-Centered Investigation into Facial Verification in Gig Work
Watkins, E. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579485 · Cited by 18
Stangl, A., Sadjo, E., Emami-Naeini, P., Wang, Y., Gurari, D., & Findlater, L. (2023) · 20th International Web for All Conference · doi:10.1145/3587281.3587296 · Cited by 15
Saliency Cards: A Framework to Characterize and Compare Saliency Methods
Boggust, A., Suresh, H., Strobelt, H., Guttag, J. V., & Satyanarayan, A. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3593997 · Cited by 15
Bound by the Bounty: Collaboratively Shaping Evaluation Processes for Queer AI Harms
Dennler, N. S., Ovalle, A., Singh, A., Soldaini, L., Subramonian, A., Tu, H., Agnew, W. S., Ghosh, A., Yee, K., Peradejordi, I. F., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604682 · Cited by 22
AI research ethics is in its infancy: the EU’s AI Act can make it a grown-up
Rességuier, A., & Ufert, F. (2023) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161231220946 · Cited by 12
Reconfiguring Participatory Design to Resist AI Realism
Gautam, A. (2024) · Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/3661455.3669867 · Cited by 18
Katirai, A., García, N., Ide, K., Nakashima, Y., & Kishimoto, A. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00517-3 · Cited by 19
Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs
Belgodere, B. M., Dognin, P., Ivankay, A., Melnyk, I., Mroueh, Y., Mojsilović, A., Navrátil, J., Nitsure, A., Padhi, I., Rigotti, M., et al. (2024) · IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2024.3477976 · Cited by 31
Alderman, J. E., Palmer, J., Laws, E., McCradden, M. D., Ordish, J., Ghassemi, M., Pfohl, S. R., Rostamzadeh, N., Cole-Lewis, H. J., Glocker, B., et al. (2024) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aip2401088 · Cited by 16
A Review on Vision-Language-Based Approaches: Challenges and Applications
Pham, M.-T., Pham, Q.-H., Tran, Q.-D., Ho, H.-T., Nguyen, L. V., Huy, D. N. M., & Nguyen, T. (2025) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.060363 · Cited by 19
Thornton, L., Knowles, B., & Blair, G. S. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445871 · Cited by 22
Towards an accountable Internet of Things: a call for reviewability
Norval, C., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. P. (2021) · Institution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · doi:10.1049/pbse014e_ch5 · Cited by 15
Steele, L., Tan, X. L., Olabi, B., Gao, J., Tanaka, R. J., & Williams, H. C. (2022) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.18814 · Cited by 17
How Data Scientists Review the Scholarly Literature
Mysore, S., Jasim, M., Song, H., Akbar, S., Randall, A. K. C., & Mahyar, N. (2023) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3576840.3578309 · Cited by 19
Klinische Entscheidungsfindung mit Künstlicher Intelligenz
Samhammer, D., Beck, S., Budde, K., Burchardt, A., Faber, M., Gerndt, S., Möller, S., Osmanodja, B., Roller, R., & Dabrock, P. (2023) · Essentials · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-67008-8 · Cited by 14
FAT Forensics: A Python toolbox for algorithmic fairness, accountability and transparency
Sokol, K., Santos‐Rodríguez, R., & Flach, P. A. (2022) · Software Impacts · doi:10.1016/j.simpa.2022.100406 · Cited by 15
Confounding Tradeoffs for Neural Network QuantizationPreprint
Garg, S., Jain, A., Lou, J., & Nahmias, M. A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.06366 · Cited by 21
What Would Jiminy Cricket Do? Towards Agents That Behave MorallyPreprint
Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., Zou, A., Patel, S., Zhu, C., Navarro, J., Song, D. X., Li, B., & Steinhardt, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.13136 · Cited by 15
Learning visual language models for video understanding
Yang, A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/802872a7z8092z4556za1fdz2c7af45f0e72 · Cited by 26
From Transparency to Accountability and Back: A Discussion of Access and Evidence in AI Auditing
Cen, S. H., & Alur, R. (2024) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3689904.3694711 · Cited by 35
OpenML: Insights from 10 years and more than a thousand papers
Bischl, B., Casalicchio, G., Das, T., Feurer, M., Fischer, S., Gijsbers, P., Mukherjee, S., Müller, A., Németh, L., Oala, L., et al. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101317 · Cited by 15
Harrath, Y., Adohinzin, O., Kaabi, J., & Saathoff, M. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14090374 · Cited by 18
Key Information Influencing Patient Decision-Making About AI in Health Care: Survey Experiment Study
Zhu, X., Stroud, A. M., Minteer, S. A., Yoo, D. W., Ridgeway, J. L., Mooghali, M., Miller, J. E., & Barry, B. A. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/75615 · Cited by 18
LaCroix, T., & Mohseni, A. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03763-2 · Cited by 18
Peace and Prosperity for the Digital Age? The Colonial Political Economy of European AI Governance
Carmel, E., & Paul, R. (2022) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2022.3173340 · Cited by 17
The Challenge of Ethical Interoperability
Danks, D. J., & Trusilo, D. (2022) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-022-00014-2 · Cited by 14
Unsilencing colonial archives via automated entity recognition
Luthra, M., Todorov, K., Jeurgens, C., & Colavizza, G. (2023) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-02-2022-0038 · Cited by 14
Majeed, A., & Hwang, S. O. (2023) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2023.3240450 · Cited by 14
Balagopalan, A., Madras, D., Yang, D., Hadfield-Menell, D., Hadfield, G. K., & Ghassemi, M. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq0701 · Cited by 19
Reproducibility in NLP: What Have We Learned from the Checklist?
Magnusson, I., Smith, N. A., & Dodge, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.809 · Cited by 22
Understanding and evaluating harms of AI-generated image captions in political images
Sarhan, H., & Hegelich, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2023.1245684 · Cited by 16
From Black Boxes to Conversations: Incorporating XAI in a Conversational Agent
Nguyen, V. B., Schlötterer, J., & Seifert, C. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44070-0_4 · Cited by 28
A unified and practical user-centric framework for explainable artificial intelligence
Kaplan, S., Uusitalo, H. M. T., & Lensu, L. T. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111107 · Cited by 21
ChatGPT Giving Relationship Advice – How Reliable Is It?
Hou, H., Leach, K., & Huang, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31338 · Cited by 14
Geng, Y. (2024) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100816 · Cited by 14
Aboelazm, K. S. (2025) · International Journal of Law and Management · doi:10.1108/ijlma-06-2024-0208 · Cited by 18
Easy, Reproducible and Quality-Controlled Data Collection with CROWDAQ
Ning, Q., Wu, H., Dasigi, P., Dua, D., Gardner, M., Logan, R. L., Marasović, A., & Nie, Z. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.17 · Cited by 14
HumBugDB: A Large-scale Acoustic Mosquito Dataset
Kiskin, I., Sinka, M., Cobb, A. D., Rafique, W., Wang, L., Zilli, D., Gutteridge, B., Dam, R., Marinos, T., Li, Y.-P., et al. (2021) · NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07607 · Cited by 45
The ROOTS Search Tool: Data Transparency for LLMs
Piktus, A., Akiki, C., Villegas, P., Laurençon, H., Dupont, G., Luccioni, A. S., Jernite, Y., & Rogers, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.29 · Cited by 29
Artificial Intelligence Strategies for National Security and Safety StandardsPreprint
Blasch, E., Sung, J., Nguyen, T., Daniel, C. P., & Mason, A. P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.05727 · Cited by 14
Measuring justice in machine learning
Lundgard, A. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372838 · Cited by 17
Rissanen Data Analysis: Examining Dataset Characteristics via Description LengthPreprint
Perez, E., Kiela, D., & Cho, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03872 · Cited by 13
ESR: Ethics and Society Review of Artificial Intelligence ResearchPreprint
Bernstein, M. S., Levi, M., Magnus, D. C., Rajala, B., Satz, D. M., & Waeiss, Q. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.11521 · Cited by 25
Mundt, M., Lang, S., Delfosse, Q., & Kersting, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03331 · Cited by 16
Grill, G. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zekqv · Cited by 15
Artificial Intelligence for Earth System Predictability (AI4ESP) (2021 Workshop Report)
Hickmon, N. L., Varadharajan, C., Hoffman, F. M., Wainwright, H. M., & Collis, S. (2022) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.2172/1888810 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K.
- Affiliations
- DAIR Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1803.09010
- OpenAlex
- W2795038878
- Cited by
- 2,474
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 795 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 298 · 2023: 379 · 2022: 221 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 251.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- dataset documentation, data provenance, data sharing, data reuse, metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
