CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 81Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Low overhead quantum computation using lattice surgery

Open access
Fowler, Austin G., Gidney, Craig·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1808.06709arXiv 1808.06709
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

When calculating the overhead of a quantum algorithm made fault-tolerant using the surface code, many previous works have used defects and braids for logical qubit storage and state distillation. In this work, we show that lattice surgery reduces the storage overhead by over a factor of 4, and the distillation overhead by nearly a factor of 5, making it possible to run algorithms with $10^8$ T gates using only $3.7\times 10^5$ physical qubits capable of executing gates with error $p\sim 10^{-3}$. These numbers strongly suggest that defects and braids in the surface code should be deprecated in favor of lattice surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1808.06709

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The T factory count for Gheorghiu et al. (2019) [30] was inferred by dividing the stated T count of 2.4·10^12 by the production rate of the T factory from [27], approximately 25kHz for the given surface code cycle time.

    “The T factory count was inferred by dividing the stated T count of 2 . 4 · 10 12 by the production rate of the T factory from [27], which is approximately 25kHz for the given surface code cycle time.”

    From How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

    Section X (p. 6) describes a lattice-surgery T-state distillation structure, and the Conclusion (p. 8) gives an example using a 1 µs surface-code detection cycle. But our copy does not state a factory production rate of approximately 25 kHz or provide the claimed factory-count calculation; the T count of 2.4 × 10^12 is not in this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The surface code provides mechanisms like lattice surgery to perform operations between distant qubits.

    “The surface code also provides mechanisms like lattice surgery26,27 to perform operations between distant qubits.”

    From Yoked surface codes (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [9]S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. A 71 , 022316 (2005), quant-ph/0403025. · arXiv
  2. [10]B. W. Reichardt, Quant. Info. Proc. 4 , 251 (2005), quantph/0411036.
  3. [11]Y. Li, New J. Phys. 17 , 023037 (2015), arXiv:1410.7808. · arXiv
  4. [12]B. J. Brown, K. Laubscher, M. S. Kesselring, and J. R. Wootton, Phys. Rev. X 7 , 021029 (2017), arXiv:1609.04673. · arXiv
  5. [13]D. Litinski and F. von Oppen, Quantum 2 , 62 (2018), arXiv:1709.02318. · arXiv
  6. [14]A. G. Fowler, D. S. Wang, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Quant. Info. Comput. 11 , 8 (2011), arXiv:1004.0255. · arXiv
  7. [15]A. G. Fowler, arXiv:1310.0863 (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.0863 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Fowler, A. G., & Gidney, C.
ORCID
Fowler, Austin G.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1808.06709
arXiv
1808.06709
OpenAlex
W4394662590
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
lattice surgery, surface code, fault-tolerant quantum computing, storage overhead, T-gate, topological defects, braids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review