Cited by 149Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Thinking Fast and Slow: Efficient Text-to-Visual Retrieval with Transformers

Open access
Miech, Antoine, Alayrac, Jean-Baptiste, Laptev, Ivan, Sivic, Josef, Zisserman, Andrew·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Our objective is language-based search of large-scale image and video datasets. For this task, the approach that consists of independently mapping text and vision to a joint embedding space, a.k.a. dual encoders, is attractive as retrieval scales and is efficient for billions of images using approximate nearest neighbour search. An alternative approach of using vision-text transformers with cross-attention gives considerable improvements in accuracy over the joint embeddings, but is often inapplicable in practice for large-scale retrieval given the cost of the cross-attention mechanisms required for each sample at test time. This work combines the best of both worlds. We make the following three contributions. First, we equip transformer-based models with a new fine-grained cross-attention architecture, providing significant improvements in retrieval accuracy whilst preserving scalability. Second, we introduce a generic approach for combining a Fast dual encoder model with our Slow but accurate transformer-based model via distillation and reranking. Finally, we validate our approach on the Flickr30K image dataset where we show an increase in inference speed by several orders of magnitude while having results competitive to the state of the art. We also extend our method to the video domain, improving the state of the art on the VATEX dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00970

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This has been studied for more challenging and fine-grained tasks by imposing region level alignment.

    “This has been studied for more challenging and fine-grained tasks (e.g., object detection [269], visual question answering [103], [106], [112], [263], and instance retrieval [222], [263]) by imposing region (semantic parts such as objects) level alignment.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [269]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Guobin Chen, Wongun Choi, Xiang Yu, Tony Han, and Man- mohan Chandraker. Learning efficient object detection mod- els with knowledge distillation. In NIPS, 2017. 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miech, A., Alayrac, J.-B., Laptev, I., Sivic, J., & Zisserman, A.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
9821-9831
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3141362964
Cited by
149
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 12
FWCI
9.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
text-to-image retrieval, video-text retrieval, cross-attention, dual-encoder models, approximate nearest neighbor search, knowledge distillation, re-ranking, inference efficiency, large-scale image retrieval, Flickr30k

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review