The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,601–4,692 of 4,692
Syntactic multilingual probing of pre-trained language models of code
López, J. A. H., Weyssow, M., Cuadrado, J. S., & Sahraoui, H. A. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2025.112604
Martínez, M. G., Soto, A. T., Soto, M. D. T., & López, E. E. R. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97907-1_13
Saini, M., Sengupta, E., Sharma, H., et al. (2025) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-025-05606-4
Understanding the Context of Sit-Stand Desk Usage for Promoting Healthy and Productive Behaviors
Chung, J., Lee, S., Hu, D., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813251367013
Delay, deny, and defend: Public outrage at health insurance companies and stock market debacle
Li, C., Dutta, M., Duo, J., & Dutta, S. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334399
Leveraging Social Media and AI for Early Community Mental Health Support
Bunch, K., Nguyen, D., Kozel, G., Doan, T. V., & Lin, E. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.95047 · Cited by 1
A Systematic Literature Review on LLM-Based Content Classification
Cosme, D., Galvão, A., & Abreu, F. B. E. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06878-1_7
Nguyen, K., Vũ, B. D., Chandna, S., Schultz, J., & Mayer, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521623 · Cited by 2
Question Answering in a Low-Resource Language: Dataset and Deep Learning Adaptations for Sinhala
Ranasinghe, J., & Weerasinghe, R. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04339-9_22
Improving Early Dementia Detection with Advanced Language Models Based on Linguistic Features
Farmanbar, M., Freja, S. A., & Shakeri, A. (2025) · Frontiers of artificial intelligence, ethics and multidisciplinary applications. · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7945-4_11
Linguistic Alphas: Decoding the Market Impact of Words in Software Earnings Calls
de León, J. J., & Medda, F. (2025) · Cureus Journal of Business and Economics. · doi:10.7759/s44404-025-08244-6 · Cited by 1
Cox, D. J. (2025) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-025-00484-y
Large Language Models for Message Mediation in Multi-agent Networks Environments
Valadão, M. D. M., Carvalho, C. B., & Sabino, W. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97119-8_12
Yu, C.-Y., He, J., & Zhang, W. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3774791.3774799
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D'Souza, J. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r595153
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D'Souza, J. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r595154
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D’Souza, J., & Rabby, G. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r656111
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D'Souza, J. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r385010
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D’Souza, J. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r606164
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D’Souza, J., & Rabby, G. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r656113 · Cited by 1
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D'Souza, J. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r585918
Ontology Vocabulary Extraction from Texts Using Transformers
Naidoo, K., & Dombeu, J. V. F. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD) · doi:10.1145/3759023.3759091
Knowledge distillation method for spatio-temporal tasks: a survey
Li, X., Gao, S., & Shang, S. (2025) · GeoInformatica · doi:10.1007/s10707-025-00563-x
Text Classification Techniques for Low-Resource Indian Languages: Challenges and Trends
Khanduja, N., Kumar, N., & Chauhan, A. (2026) · Management and industrial engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04606-2_13
An Evolutionary-Based Approach for Hardware-Aware Optimization of BERT-Like Models
Vakhrushev, V., & Попова, Н. Н. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13127-0_29 · Cited by 1
Martín-Fernández, I., Esteban-Romero, S., Gil-Martín, M., & Fernández-Martínez, F. (2026) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-026-21260-3
Predicting Personality from Text
Cappel, J., Hüner, E., & Selimllari, F. (2026) · Contributions to economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13458-5_12
Shiri, M. A., Mansouri, N., & Zade, B. M. H. (2026) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.1007/s44196-026-01211-4
The Future of Higher Education in the Era of Generative AI
Williams, J. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1875-3_15
AI-powered conversational framework for mental health diagnosis
Diwakar, D., Raj, D., Prasad, A., Ali, G., & ELAffendi, M. A. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3602
A comparative evaluation of transformer models for medical abstract classification
AnsariShiri, M., & Mansouri, N. (2026) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-026-21140-w · Cited by 1
Gomathi, B., Saravana Balaji, B., Khattab, O., et al. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3467
Evaluating the capability of base and large-scale language models for multilingual sarcasm detection
Bade, G. Y., Kolesnikova, O., Oropeza, J. L., & Tash, M. S. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3584 · Cited by 1
Cross-domain sentiment classification in Slovak: a comparative analysis of transformer-based models
Kelebercová, L., & Držík, D. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3641 · Cited by 1
Sogunle, M., & Fagbola, T. M. (2026) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-026-01594-4
Chintalapati, J., Akhil Rajeev, P., Choudhury, B., Bedare, M., & Kumar, Y. (2025) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-026-00501-2
A Straightforward Approach to Construct “Lightweight” Token Graphs from Transformers
Pimentel, J., Amorim, J., & Rudzicz, F. (2026) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.a.618
IDAP++: Advancing Divergence-Aware Pruning with Joint Filter and Layer Optimization
Samarin, A., Nazarenko, A., Kotenko, E., Savelev, A., Toropov, A., Motyko, A. A., & Malykh, V. A. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3786659
Zhang, C., Shen, L., & Li, Y. (2026) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-026-02290-8
Shamshiri, A., Jaberizadeh, M., Chowdhury, S. S. U., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9351360/v1
Tuning Bert-based Models for Sentiment Analysis of Texts
Anisimov, A. V., Marchenko, O. O., Nasirov, E., & Тарануха, В. Ю. (2026) · Cybernetics and Systems Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10559-026-00857-4
Question answering dataset for information retrieval in Slovak
Hládek, D., Stromko, M., Sopkovič, K., Pleva, M., & Su, M.-H. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3831
Regmi, S., & Saravanan, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17443-7_13
Unnikrishnan, R., Kamath, S., & Ananthanarayana, V. S. (2025) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13497-4_4
Polarisation and Identity Discourse on Malaysian TikTok: A Digital Humanities ApproachPreprint
Karim, N. K. A., Mustapha, J. C., & Jaafar, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9268897/v1
Prasad, U. J., & Mishra, P. K. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section A Physical Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40010-026-01098-y
İncidelen, M., & Aydoğan, M. (2026) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-026-00915-z
Comparison of Transformer-based Deep Learning Methods for the Paraphrase Identification Task
Vrublevskyi, V., & Marchenko, O. O. (2022) · International Scientific Conference Information Technology and Implementation (IT&I) · doi:10.55056/ceur-ws.org/vol-3624/short_5.pdf
A blockchain-enabled hybrid intrusion detection framework for resource-constrained devices
Stolz, C., & Zhang, J. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3899
The Data Gradient: Quantifying Dataset Influence in End-to-End Machine Learning Systems
Tomar, M. (2026) · Premier Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.70389/pjcs.100014
ViBERT-ESG: Advancing ESG Classification in Vietnamese with ViEnESG-100 Dataset
Nguyen, V., Tran, D., Do, K., Bui, T., & Tran, V. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30539-8_16
Deshpande, S. B., Desai, P., Goh, K. O. M., Ajawan, P., Mathad, K., & Deshpande, U. U. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01700-7
General-purpose named entity recognition using transformer-based fine-tuned approach
Goel, P., Bhatt, A., Pradhan, B., et al. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3951
David, B., Isingoma, B., Nakatumba-Nabende, J., & Jjingo, D. (2026) · Cureus Journal of Computer Science. · doi:10.7759/s44389-026-00167-y
Identifying Quality Indicators in Student Self-Reflections in Software Engineering
Minish, M., Galster, M., & Gilson, F. (2026) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-026-10930-3
Ndao, I., Dramé, K., Sambe, G., Diallo, G., & Faye, Y. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32026-1_10
LLMs or Naive Bayes? Old Gems or New Ways
Sada, M. F., Graham, J. A., Tatineni, M., Mishin, D., Kim, S., & Würthwein, F. (2026) · Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing · doi:10.1145/3785462.3815880
Lin, S., & Zeng, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1768708
Lipianina-Honcharenko, K. (2026) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-026-01213-7
Dialogue Style Transfer for Multiple Characters
Pravosud, R., & Marchenko, O. O. (2026) · Cybernetics and Systems Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10559-026-00891-2
The Impact of NLP Techniques on Financial Sentiment Analysis: From Lexicons to Transformers
Ribeiro, R., Cardoso, H. L., & Gonçalves, C. T. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32023-0_12
Leveraging Tattoo Description Classification in Historical Record Linkage
Sartor, E., Foxcroft, J., & Antonie, L. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34896-8_20
Psychosocial predictors and justification patterns of traditional and alternative medicine in Peru
Fasce, A., Rosales-Trabuco, J. E., Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., et al. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-08902-5
Bodaghi, A., Fung, B. C. M., Shahen, J., & Schmitt, K. (2026) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-026-01276-6
Finding the Best Model for Amazon Product Feedback: A Comparative, Tuned, and Ensembled Study
Truong, C. D., Mai, X. D., Phan, T. Đ., et al. (2026) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26919-5_4
Automatic detection of depression in clinical interviews with large language modelsPreprint
Xian, L., Chan, K. Y., Chen, J., Chan, J. W. Y., Chan, N. Y., Huang, B., Wing, Y.-K., & Li, T. M. H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10823532/v1
Contrastive Learning for Authorship Verification
Kirby, P. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39150-6_7
Demirkiran, E. T. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10975833/v1
Alagandula, K., & Prakash, R. V. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28924-7_7
Omri, M. N., & Louhichi, B. (2026) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-026-12365-9
Digital Approaches to Technology Intelligence: The Case of Automotive Electrical Systems
Plaue, M., & Walde, P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-51511-9_21
Nguyen, Q. A., Nguyen, Q. K., & Quach, L.-D. (2026) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-026-01271-8
CART-Doc: A Compact Design Space for Confidence-Routed Document Key Information Extraction
Oladele, D. A., & Sibiya, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-6510-7_6
cueEM: human-like entity matching via text-centric hybrid attention
Liu, X., Li, X., Yao, J., Cheng, P., Su, Y., Zhong, W., & Jiao, Y. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.4102
Empirical Evaluation of Automatic Speech Act Classification: From Logistic Regression to GPT-4o
Conrad, S., Ellendorff, T., & Schneider, G. (2026) · Corpus Pragmatics · doi:10.1007/s41701-026-00266-0
Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference
Gong, C., Liu, B., & Li, M. (2026) · 2026 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp63933.2026.00258
Green AI: Balancing Model Complexity and Energy Footprint in Deep Learning
Aggarwal, D., Sharma, D., & Saxena, A. B. (2025) · 2025 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS) · doi:10.1109/icscds65426.2025.11167425
The Trust Tax of Privacy and Robustness: An Empirical Study Across Vision, NLP, and Tabular ML
Kandakatla, J. R. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) · doi:10.1109/icaiic68212.2026.11454302
Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Vaughan, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.21783 · Cited by 505
HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.03771 · Cited by 3,347
Self-citationSwitch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity
Fedus, W., Zoph, B., & Shazeer, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.03961 · Cited by 1,005
Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training
Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., Munguia, L.-M., Rothchild, D., So, D., Texier, M., & Dean, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.10350 · Cited by 486
True Few-Shot Learning with Language Models
Perez, E., Kiela, D., & Cho, K. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.11447 · Cited by 226
Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depth
Dong, Y., Cordonnier, J.-B., & Loukas, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03404 · Cited by 195
I-BERT: Integer-only BERT Quantization
Kim, S., Gholami, A., Yao, Z., Mahoney, M. W., & Keutzer, K. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.01321 · Cited by 186
(2020) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 142
BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models
Thakur, N., Reimers, N., Rücklé, A., Srivastava, A., & Gurevych, I. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08663 · Cited by 45
BinaryBERT: Pushing the Limit of BERT Quantization
Bai, H., Zhang, W., Hou, L., Shang, L., Jin, J., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., Lyu, M., & King, I. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.15701 · Cited by 42
Venkit, P. N., & Wilson, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13259 · Cited by 14
NxMTransformer: Semi-Structured Sparsification for Natural Language Understanding via ADMM
Holmes, C., Zhang, M., He, Y., & Wu, B. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15766 · Cited by 7
ALL-IN-ONE: Multi-Task Learning BERT models for Evaluating Peer Assessments
Jia, Q., Cui, J., Xiao, Y., Liu, C., Rashid, P., & Gehringer, E. F. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03895 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
