The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
“While core models like BERT and GPT-2 continue to be popular, other specialized models including DistilBERT (Sanh et al., 2019), which was developed for the library, are now widely downloaded by the community.”
Self-citationOn the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988
Han (2023) · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3152247 · Cited by 4,682
Knowledge Distillation: A Survey
Gou, J., Yu, B., Maybank, S. J., & Tao, D. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-021-01453-z · Cited by 3,931
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Ray, P. P. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · Cited by 2,463
Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks
Gururangan, S., Marasović, A., Swayamdipta, S., Lo, K., Beltagy, I., Downey, D., & Smith, N. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.740 · Cited by 2,103
Text Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
Shorten, C., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Furht, B. (2021) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00492-0 · Cited by 1,852
A primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works
Rogers, A., Kovaleva, O., & Rumshisky, A. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00349 · Cited by 1,552
Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey
Qiu, X., Sun, T., Xu, Y., Shao, Y., Dai, N., & Huang, X. (2020) · Science China Technological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3 · Cited by 1,591
Deep Learning--based Text Classification
Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad-Khasmakhi, N., Asgari-Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3439726 · Cited by 2,122
A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q.-L., & Tang, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123618 · Cited by 1,452
Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillation
Li, J., Selvaraju, R. R., Gotmare, A. D., Joty, S., Xiong, C., & Hoi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07651 · Cited by 1,078
Efficient transformers: A survey
Tay, Y., Dehghani, M., Bahri, D., & Metzler, D. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3530811 · Cited by 1,267
LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law School
Chalkidis, I., Fergadiotis, M., Malakasiotis, P., Αλέτρας, Ν., & Androutsopoulos, I. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.261 · Cited by 1,453
Pre-trained models: Past, present and future
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002 · Cited by 994
TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for natural language understanding
Jiao, X., Yin, Y., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Chen, X., Li, L., Wang, F., & Liu, Q. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.372 · Cited by 1,786
Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformers
Abnar, S., & Zuidema, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.385 · Cited by 995
Frozen in Time: A Joint Video and Image Encoder for End-to-End Retrieval
Bain, M., Nagrani, A., Varol, G., & Zisserman, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00175 · Cited by 76
Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexity
Wang, S., Li, B. Z., Khabsa, M., Fang, H., & Ma, H. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04768 · Cited by 867
MDETR - Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understanding
Kamath, A., Singh, M., LeCun, Y., Synnaeve, G., Misra, I., & Carion, N. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00180 · Cited by 802
MobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited Devices
Sun, Z., Yu, H., Song, X., Liu, R., Yang, Y., & Zhou, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.195 · Cited by 757
Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated LearningPreprint
Lin, T., Kong, L., Stich, S. U., & Jaggi, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07242 · Cited by 761
It’s Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learners
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.185 · Cited by 747
MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformers
Wang, W., Wei, F., Dong, L., Bao, H., Yang, N., & Zhou, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10957 · Cited by 703
An introduction to Deep Learning in Natural Language Processing: Models, techniques, and tools
Lauriola, I., Lavelli, A., & Aiolli, F. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.05.103 · Cited by 755
COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation
Rei, R., Stewart, C., Farinha, A. C., & Lavie, A. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.213 · Cited by 1,019
Communication-efficient federated learning via knowledge distillation
Wu, C., Wu, F., Lyu, L., Huang, Y., & Xie, X. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29763-x · Cited by 700
Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Framework
Beutel, D. J., Topal, T., Mathur, A., Qiu, X., Fernandez-Marques, J., Gao, Y., Sani, L., Li, K. H., Parcollet, T., de Gusmão, P. P. B., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.14390 · Cited by 622
Efficient Deep Learning: A Survey on Making Deep Learning Models Smaller, Faster, and Better
Menghani, G. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3578938 · Cited by 732
Lin, X., Xiong, G., Gou, G., Li, Z., Shi, J., & Yu, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512217 · Cited by 599
FNet: Mixing Tokens with Fourier Transforms
Lee-Thorp, J., Ainslie, J., Eckstein, I., & Ontañón, S. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.319 · Cited by 614
Impact of AI assistance on student agency
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967 · Cited by 548
A comprehensive survey on applications of transformers for deep learning tasks
Islam, S., Elmekki, H., Elsebai, A., Bentahar, J., Drawel, N., Rjoub, G., & Witold Pedrycz, C. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122666 · Cited by 590
IntelliCode compose: code generation using transformer
Svyatkovskiy, A., Deng, S. K., Fu, S., & Sundaresan, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3368089.3417058 · Cited by 474
“n [38] is the model compression technique in which a smaller model – the student network – is trained to reproduce the results of a larger model – the teacher network. It has been shown in literature [39, 40], that it is possible to reach comparable performance on various tasks using distilled neural networks, resulti…”
A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classification
Bayer, M., Kaufhold, M., & Reuter, C. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3544558 · Cited by 496
Overview of the Transformer-based Models for NLP Tasks
Gillioz, A., Casas, J., Mugellini, E., & Khaled, O. A. (2020) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2020f20 · Cited by 492
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Bai, Y., Jones, A., Ndousse, K., Askell, A., Chen, A., DasSarma, N., Drain, D., Fort, S., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05862 · Cited by 442
Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive ReviewPreprint
Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad, N., Asgari-Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.03705 · Cited by 385
Nyströmformer: A Nyström-based Algorithm for Approximating Self-Attention
Xiong, Y., Zeng, Z., Chakraborty, R., Tan, M., Fung, G., Li, Y., & Singh, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i16.17664 · Cited by 376
DeCLUTR: Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representations
Giorgi, J., Nitski, O., Wang, B., & Bader, G. D. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.72 · Cited by 491
Data augmentation approaches in natural language processing: A survey
Li, B., Hou, Y., & Che, W. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.03.001 · Cited by 401
Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoders
Casanueva, I., Temčinas, T., Gerz, D., Henderson, M., & Vulić, I. (2020) · Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI (NLP4ConvAI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlp4convai-1.5 · Cited by 505
Evaluation of Sentiment Analysis in Finance: From Lexicons to Transformers
Mishev, K., Gjorgjevikj, A., Vodenska, I., Chitkushev, L. T., & Trajanov, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3009626 · Cited by 380
COVIDSenti: A Large-Scale Benchmark Twitter Data Set for COVID-19 Sentiment Analysis
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Khushi, M., Eklund, P., & Kim, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2021.3051189 · Cited by 360
A Simple Language Model for Task-Oriented DialoguePreprint
Hosseini-Asl, E., McCann, B., Wu, C.-S., Yavuz, S., & Socher, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.00796 · Cited by 398
A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4
Kalyan, K. S. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100048 · Cited by 335
DeeBERT: Dynamic Early Exiting for Accelerating BERT Inference
Xin, J., Tang, R., Lee, J., Yu, Y., & Lin, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.204 · Cited by 476
Data-driven materials research enabled by natural language processing and information extraction
Olivetti, E. A., Cole, J. M., Kim, E., Kononova, O., Ceder, G., Han, T. Y.-J., & Hiszpanski, A. M. (2020) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0021106 · Cited by 302
Hierarchical Multi-modal Contextual Attention Network for Fake News Detection
Qian, S., Wang, J., Hu, J., Fang, Q., & Xu, C. (2021) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462871 · Cited by 314
Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustness
Hendrycks, D., Liu, X., Wallace, E., Dziedzic, A., Krishnan, R., & Song, D. X. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.244 · Cited by 406
Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Sampling
Hofstätter, S., Lin, S.-C., Yang, J.-H., Lin, J., & Hanbury, A. (2021) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462891 · Cited by 374
Log-based Anomaly Detection Without Log Parsing
Le, V.-H., & Zhang, H. (2021) · 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase51524.2021.9678773 · Cited by 361
VLP: A Survey on Vision-language Pre-training
Chen, F., Zhang, D., Han, M., Chen, X.-Y., Shi, J. C., Xu, S., & Xu, B. (2023) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-022-1369-5 · Cited by 330
polyBERT: a chemical language model to enable fully machine-driven ultrafast polymer informatics
Kuenneth, C., & Ramprasad, R. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39868-6 · Cited by 326
WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts
Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518
AMMU: A survey of transformer-based biomedical pretrained language models
Kalyan, K. S., Rajasekharan, A., & Sangeetha, S. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103982 · Cited by 292
FastBERT: a Self-distilling BERT with Adaptive Inference Time
Liu, W., Zhou, P., Wang, Z., Zhao, Z., Deng, H., & Ju, Q. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.537 · Cited by 307
Large language models for human–robot interaction: A review
Zhang, C., Chen, J., Li, J., Peng, Y., & Mao, Z. (2023) · Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.birob.2023.100131 · Cited by 309
MiniLMv2: Multi-Head Self-Attention Relation Distillation for Compressing Pretrained Transformers
Wang, W., Bao, H., Huang, S., Dong, L., & Wei, F. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.188 · Cited by 372
Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies
Callaghan, M., Schleussner, C.-F., Nath, S., Lejeune, Q., Knutson, T. R., Reichstein, M., Hansen, G., Theokritoff, E., Andrijevic, M., Brecha, R. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01168-6 · Cited by 251
A benchmark study of machine learning models for online fake news detection
Khan, J. Y., Khondaker, M. T. I., Afroz, S., Uddin, G., & Iqbal, A. (2021) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100032 · Cited by 335
Yang, L., Chen, H., Li, Z., Ding, X., & Wu, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3360454 · Cited by 238
A Fine-Tuned BERT-Based Transfer Learning Approach for Text Classification
Qasim, R., Bangyal, W. H., Alqarni, M., & Almazroi, A. A. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/3498123 · Cited by 268
CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulation
Shridhar, M., Manuelli, L., & Fox, D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.12098 · Cited by 223
Just Ask: Learning to Answer Questions from Millions of Narrated Videos
Yang, A., Miech, A., Šivic, J., Laptev, I., & Schmid, C. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00171 · Cited by 232
Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruning
Guo, D., Rush, A., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.378 · Cited by 220
Movement pruning: Adaptive sparsity by fine-tuning
Sanh, V., Wolf, T., & Rush, A. M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.07683 · Cited by 218
Self-citationFake Reviews Detection: A Survey
Mohawesh, R., Xu, S., Tran, S. N., Ollington, R., Springer, M., Jararweh, Y., & Maqsood, S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3075573 · Cited by 238
Advanced metaheuristic optimization techniques in applications of deep neural networks: a review
Elaziz, M. A., Dahou, A., Abualigah, L., Yu, L., Alshinwan, M., Khasawneh, A. M., & Lu, S. (2021) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-05960-5 · Cited by 226
Multilingual is not enough: BERT for FinnishPreprint
Virtanen, A., Kanerva, J., Ilo, R., Luoma, J., Luotolahti, J., Salakoski, T., Ginter, F., & Pyysalo, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.07076 · Cited by 441
Croce, D., Castellucci, G., & Basili, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.191 · Cited by 219
AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentation
Dai, H., Liu, Z., Liao, W., Huang, X., Cao, Y., Wu, Z., Zhao, L., Xu, S., Zeng, F., Liu, W., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2025.3536934 · Cited by 464
BERT Loses Patience: Fast and Robust Inference with Early ExitPreprint
Zhou, W., Xu, C., Ge, T., McAuley, J., Xu, K., & Wei, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04152 · Cited by 227
Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review
Nerella, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., Contreras, M., Siegel, S., Bumin, A., Silva, B., Sena, J., Shickel, B., Bihorac, A., et al. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102900 · Cited by 281
Evo-ViT: Slow-Fast Token Evolution for Dynamic Vision Transformer
Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, M., Sheng, K., Li, K., Dong, W., Zhang, L., Xu, C., & Sun, X. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i3.20202 · Cited by 226
Friha, O., Ferrag, M. A., Kantarcı, B., Çakmak, B., Ozgun, A., & Ghoualmi‐Zine, N. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3456549 · Cited by 226
The great Transformer: Examining the role of large language models in the political economy of AI
Luitse, D. M. R., & Denkena, W. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211047734 · Cited by 242
Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?Preprint
Łukasik, M., Bhojanapalli, S., Menon, A. K., & Kumar, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.02819 · Cited by 191
The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT NetworksPreprint
Chen, T., Frankle, J., Chang, S., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Carbin, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.12223 · Cited by 225
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Khan, S. K., & Prasad, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3434237 · Cited by 194
Contextualized Perturbation for Textual Adversarial Attack
Li, D., Zhang, Y., Peng, H., Chen, L., Brockett, C., Sun, M., & Dolan, B. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.400 · Cited by 228
Ash, E., & Hansen, S. (2023) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-082222-074352 · Cited by 197
A novel fusion-based deep learning model for sentiment analysis of COVID-19 tweets
Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Asadi, S., & Acharrya, U. R. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107242 · Cited by 192
Unsupervised Commonsense Question Answering with Self-Talk
Shwartz, V., West, P., Bras, R. J. L., Bhagavatula, C., & Choi, Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.373 · Cited by 215
AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers
Rücklé, A., Geigle, G., Glockner, M., Beck, T., Pfeiffer, J., Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.626 · Cited by 271
SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt Transfer
Vu, T., Lester, B., Constant, N., Al‐Rfou, R., & Cer, D. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.346 · Cited by 267
Unsupervised Domain Clusters in Pretrained Language Models
Aharoni, R., & Goldberg, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.692 · Cited by 181
AMMUS : A Survey of Transformer-based Pretrained Models in Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Kalyan, K. S., Rajasekharan, A., & Sangeetha, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.05542 · Cited by 357
ConveRT: Efficient and Accurate Conversational Representations from Transformers
Henderson, M., Casanueva, I., Mrkšić, N., Su, P.-H., Wen, T.-H., & Vulić, I. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.196 · Cited by 204
Lewis, P., Ott, M., Du, J., & Stoyanov, V. (2020) · Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop (ClinicalNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.clinicalnlp-1.17 · Cited by 196
DiffCSE: Difference-based Contrastive Learning for Sentence Embeddings
Chuang, Y.-S., Dangovski, R., Luo, H., Zhang, Y., Chang, S., Marin Soljacic, A., Li, S.-W. D., Yih, S., Kim, Y., & Glass, J. R. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.311 · Cited by 184
Survey on large language model-enhanced reinforcement learning: Concept, taxonomy, and methods
Cao, Y., Zhao, H., Cheng, Y., Shu, T., Chen, Y., Liu, G., Liang, G., Zhao, J., Yan, J., & Li, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3497992 · Cited by 174
End-to-End Referring Video Object Segmentation with Multimodal Transformers
Botach, A., Zheltonozhskii, E., & Baskin, C. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00493 · Cited by 188
Recent Advances in Natural Language Inference: A Survey of Benchmarks, Resources, and ApproachesPreprint
Storks, S., Gao, Q., & Chai, J. Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.01172 · Cited by 289
BERT-of-Theseus: Compressing BERT by Progressive Module Replacing
Xu, C., Zhou, W., Ge, T., Wei, F., & Zhou, M. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.633 · Cited by 213
CLIMATEBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Climate-Related TextPreprint
Webersinke, N., Kraus, M., Bingler, J., & Leippold, M. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4229146 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
