The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,001–4,100 of 4,692
MemMorph: Tool Hijacking in LLM Agents via Memory Poisoning
Zhang, X., Zheng, Y., Xu, Z., Zhou, K., Shen, B., Ou, H., Zhang, T., & Lam, K.-Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26154
“We study three types of defense strategies: Perplex-ity Filter (Alon and Kamfonas, 2023) that rejects records exceeding a fluency threshold, Distil Classifier (Sanh et al., 2019) that is trained to distinguish adversarial texts from benign ones, and LLM-based Memory Auditor that prompts a separate LLM to flag suspicio…”
InfluentialProtecting Language Models Against Unauthorized Distillation through Trace Rewriting
Ma, X., Yeoh, W., Zhang, N., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.15143
“Since its introduction, knowledge distillation has become a major workhorse in machine learning across a broad array of applications (Gou et al., 2021; Sanh et al., 2019), as it enables using large, complex, and expensive to execute teachers to train smaller and more efficient student models.”
OmniRouter: Budget and Performance Controllable Multi-LLM Routing
Mei, K., Xu, W., Guo, M., Lin, S., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.20576 · Cited by 2
Mini Minds: Exploring Bebeshka and Zlata Baby Models
Proskurina, I., Metzler, G., & Velcin, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.4 · Cited by 1
BitTensor: An Intermodel Intelligence Measure.Preprint
Steeves, J., Shaabana, A., & McAteer, M. I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Ramanarayanan, V., Mulholland, M., & Ghosh, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.09834 · Cited by 1
APPLICATION OF GATED UNITS TO BERT-BASED MODELS
Zaiev, A. (2020) · Public Communication in Science: Philosophical, Cultural, Political, Economic and IT Context · doi:10.36074/15.05.2020.v2.14
JIT-Masker: Efficient Online Distillation for Background MattingPreprint
Chuang, J., & Dong, Q. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.06185
Automatic Characterization of Stories
Kar, S. (2020)
Morisot, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the Northern Lights Deep Learning Workshop · doi:10.7557/18.6286
Improvement of a dedicated model for open domain persona-aware dialogue generationPreprint
Han, Q. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.11970
Comparative Study of Language Models on Cross-Domain Data with Model Agnostic ExplainabilityPreprint
Chhipa, M., Vazurkar, H. M., Kumar, A., & Mishra, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.04095
Weight Distillation: Transferring the Knowledge in Neural Network ParametersPreprint
Lin, Y., Li, Y., Wang, Z., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.09152
Recovery of Geographic Entities in Text for the Analysis of Spatial Patterns of Road Incidents
al., A. R. M. E. A. A. R. M. E., & TJPRC (2020) · International journal of mechanical and production engineering research and development · doi:10.24247/ijmperdjun20201501
GiBERT: Introducing Linguistic Knowledge into BERT through a Lightweight Gated Injection MethodPreprint
Peinelt, N., Rei, M., & Liakata, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12532 · Cited by 1
Towards Fully Bilingual Deep Language ModelingPreprint
Chang, L., Pyysalo, S., Kanerva, J., & Ginter, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11639 · Cited by 6
Robust Document Representations using Latent Topics and MetadataPreprint
Raman, N., Nourbakhsh, A., Shah, S., & Veloso, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12681 · Cited by 1
System Report of HW-TSC on the CAPITEL NER Evaluation.
Lei, L., Wang, M., Yang, H., Sun, S., Qin, Y. H., & Wei, D. (2020) · IberLEF@SEPLN · Cited by 1
On Estimating the Training Cost of Conversational Recommendation SystemsPreprint
Antaris, S., Rafailidis, D., & Aliannejadi, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.05302
Discriminative, Generative and Self-Supervised Approaches for Target-Agnostic LearningPreprint
Jin, Y., Buntine, W., Petitjean, F., & Webb, G. I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.06428
Understanding Word Embedding Stability Across Languages and Applications
Burdick, L. (2020) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Attacking Semantic Similarity: Generating Second-Order NLP Adversarial Examples
Morris, J. X. (2020)
diagNNose: A Library for Neural Activation AnalysisPreprint
Jumelet, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.06819
Empirical Study on the Software Engineering Practices in Open Source ML Package RepositoriesPreprint
Xiu, M., Eghan, E. E., Ming, Z., Jiang, & Adams, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01403
Data-Efficient Methods for Dialogue SystemsPreprint
Shalyminov, I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.02929 · Cited by 3
Identical Objects Recognition Based On Image and Textual Description.
Aslanov, A. A., & Loukachevitch, N. (2020)
Semantic Diversity for Natural Language Understanding Evaluation in Dialog Systems
Palumbo, E., Mezzalira, A., Marco, C. S., Manzotti, A., & Amberti, D. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-industry.5
ISCAS_ICIP at MWPD-2020 Task 1: Product Matching Based on Deep Entity Matching Frameworks.
Fu, C., Wang, T., Nie, H., et al. (2020)
Improved knowledge distillation by utilizing backward pass knowledge in neural networksPreprint
Jafari, A., Rezagholizadeh, M., & Ghodsi, A. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.12006 · Cited by 1
Conversation-Aware Filtering of Online Patient Forum Messages
Dirkson, A. R., Verberne, S., & Kraaij, W. (2020) · Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Adversarial strategies for Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation
Preciado, J. B. (2020) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)
Using NLP Techniques for Log Analysis to Recommend Activities For Troubleshooting Processes
Sköld, M. (2020) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Language processing in the era of deep learning.
Lauriola, I., Lavelli, A., & Aiolli, F. (2020) · The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks
Learning Dynamic BERT via Trainable Gate Variables and a Bi-modal RegularizerPreprint
Jeong, S., & Kwak, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.09727
Knowledge Distillation on Extractive Summarization
Lin, Y.-J., Tan, D., Chou, T.-H., Kao, H., & Wang, H.-Y. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE) · doi:10.1109/aike48582.2020.00019
A Peer Learning Method for Building Robust Text Classification Models
Jeon, H.-K., & Cheong, Y.-G. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp51126.2021.00069
TAG: Transformer Attack from Gradient.Preprint
Deng, J., Wang, Y., Li, J., Shang, C., Liu, H., Rajasekaran, S., & Ding, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Do, S., & Bang, J. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp51126.2021.00059
Using Triangle Exchange Mechanism to Accelerate the Pre-training Convergence Speed of BERT
Liao, J., Wang, N., & Yang, G. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3445815.3445856
Nair, S., & Fernandes, D. (2021)
Benchmarking a transformer-FREE model for ad-hoc retrieval
de Almeida, T. D., & Matos, S. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.293
On Geodesic Distances and Contextual Embedding Compression for Text Classification
Jha, R., & Mihata, K. (2021) · Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/11.textgraphs-1.15 · Cited by 6
Regularization and Compression of Deep Neural Networks
Khan, N. U. (2021) · HARVEST (University of Saskatchewan)
Text Representation with Pretraining and Fine-Tuning
Zong, C., Xia, R., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0100-2_4
An Explanatory Query-Based Framework for Exploring Academic ExpertisePreprint
Cocarascu, O., Mclean, A., French, P. M. W., & Toni, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.13728
Lightweight Cross-Lingual Sentence Representation LearningPreprint
Mao, Z., Gupta, P., Wang, P., Chu, C., Jaggi, M., & Kurohashi, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.13856
Incorporating Visual Layout Structures for Scientific Text Classification.Preprint
Shen, Z., Lo, K., Wang, L. L., Kuehl, B., Weld, D. S., & Downey, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
MiniVQA - A resource to build your tailored VQA competition
Delbrouck, J.-B. (2021) · Workshop on Teaching NLP (TeachingNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.teachingnlp-1.8
Unbiased Sentence Encoder For Large-Scale Multi-lingual Search EnginesPreprint
Hajiaghayi, M., Hajiaghayi, M., & Bolin, M. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.07719
Why Can You Lay Off Heads? Investigating How BERT Heads TransferPreprint
Chiang, T.-R., & Chen, Y.-N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.07137
TopGuNN: Fast NLP Training Data Augmentation using Large Corpora
Iglesias-Flores, R., Mishra, M., Patel, A., Malhotra, A., Kriz, R., Palmer, M. S., & Callison-Burch, C. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.dash-1.14
Graph-based Multilingual Product Retrieval in E-commerce SearchPreprint
Lu, H., Hu, Y., Zhao, T., Wu, T., Song, Y., & Yin, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.02978 · Cited by 6
RoSearch: Search for Robust Student Architectures When Distilling Pre-trained Language ModelsPreprint
Guo, X., Yang, J., Zhou, H., Ye, X., & Li, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.03613 · Cited by 1
Explorations In Curriculum Learning Methods For Training Language Models
Campos, D. (2020) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Persian Opinion Mining:A Networked Analysis Approach
Heydari, M., & Teimourpour, B. (2021) · International Conference on Web Research (ICWR) · doi:10.1109/icwr51868.2021.9443158 · Cited by 1
Faster BERT-based Re-ranking through Candidate Passage Extraction.
Reed, K. B., & Madabushi, H. T. (2020) · Text REtrieval Conference
LV-BERT: Exploiting Layer Variety for BERTPreprint
Yu, W., Jiang, Z., Chen, F., Hou, Q., & Feng, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.11740
Leveraging Unstructured Text Within the Context of Conversational Agents
Phillips, M. (2021) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3450613.3459660
Elbert: Fast Albert with Confidence-Window Based Early ExitPreprint
Xie, K., Lu, S., Wang, M., & Wang, Z. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.00175
ICIP at TREC-2020 Deep Learning Track.
Chen, X., He, B., Sun, L., & Sun, Y. (2020) · Text REtrieval Conference
LV-BERT: Exploiting Layer Variety for BERT
Yu, W., Jiang, Z., Chen, F., Hou, Q., & Feng, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.2 · Cited by 1
The Brownian motion in the transformer modelPreprint
Chen, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.05264 · Cited by 1
Gorospe, M. U. (2021)
Kalyan, V., Witteveen, S., & Andrews, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.13031
Yu, Z., Wang, J., & Zhang, X. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.184
General Benefits of Mono-Lingual Pre-Training in Transformers
Zhang, J. (2021) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
WikiFlash: Generating Flashcards from Wikipedia Articles
Cheng, Y., Ding, Y., Foucher, S., Pascual, D., Richter, O., Volk, M., & Wattenhofer, R. P. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92273-3_12 · Cited by 4
SoDA: On-device Conversational Slot Extraction
Ravi, S., & Kozareva, Z. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.sigdial-1.7
AutoTinyBERT: Automatic Hyper-parameter Optimization for Efficient Pre-trained Language ModelsPreprint
Yin, Y., Chen, C., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Chen, X., & Liu, Q. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.13686 · Cited by 10
Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning with Matrix-Valued Kernels for Quality Estimation
Obamuyide, A., Fomicheva, M., & Specia, L. (2021) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.repl4nlp-1.23
Decoupled Transformer for Scalable Inference in Open-domain Question AnsweringPreprint
ElFadeel, H., & Peshterliev, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.02765
Opinion Prediction with User FingerprintingPreprint
Tumarada, K., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., Dragut, E. C., Gnawali, O. D., & Mukherjee, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.00270
Mitigating Bias in the SNLI Dataset
Baas, A. (2021) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Towards deeply intelligent interfaces in relational databases
Usta, A. (2021) · Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University)
Dahlmann, L., & Lancewicki, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.10197 · Cited by 3
SAUCE: Truncated Sparse Document Signature Bit-Vectors for Fast Web-Scale Corpus ExpansionPreprint
Wahed, M., Gruhl, D., Alba, A., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.11948
Graphs where Search Methods are Indistinguishable
Krnc, M., & Pivač, N. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.3
VerbCL: A Dataset of Verbatim Quotes for Highlight Extraction in Case Law
Rossi, J., Vakulenko, S., & Kanoulas, E. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482021
Vasantharajan, C., & Thayasivam, U. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
NU:BRIEF – A Privacy-aware Newsletter Personalization Engine for Publishers
Diaz-Aviles, E., Orellana-Rodriguez, C., Brigadir, I., & Kutty, R. N. (2021) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/3460231.3478884
Exploring BERT Synonyms and Quality Prediction for Argument Retrieval.
Green, T., Moroldo, L., & Valente, A. (2021) · CLEF (Working Notes)
DeepZensols: Deep Natural Language Processing FrameworkPreprint
Landes, P., Eugenio, B. D., & Caragea, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03383
Weight Squeezing: Reparameterization for Knowledge Transfer and Model CompressionPreprint
Chumachenko, A., Gavrilov, D., Balagansky, N., & Kalaidin, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.06993 · Cited by 1
D-Coref: A Fast and Lightweight Coreference Resolution Model using DistilBERT.
Suman, C., Kumar, J., Saha, S., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Networks
Unified Distillation: Supervising the Student to Make Fewer Mistakes
Chen, Y., & Rong, P. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2003/1/012012
Can the Transformer Be Used as a Drop-in Replacement for RNNs in Text-Generating GANs?Preprint
Blin, K., & Kucharavy, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.12275
Transformer-based Sarcasm Detection in English and Slovene Language
Rašl, M., Žalik, M., & Keršič, V. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.10
Novel Algorithms for Understanding Online Reviews
Shi, T. (2021) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
New Students on Sesame Street: What Order-Aware Matrix Embeddings Can Learn from BERT.Preprint
Galke, L. P. A., Cuber, I., Meyer, C. F. J., Nölscher, H. F., Sonderecker, A., & Scherp, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Analiza ritmičnosti števnih podatkov z uporabo modela cosinor
Velikajne, N., & Moškon, M. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.14
Question Classification for the Travel Domain using Deep Contextualized Word Embedding Models
Weerakoon, C., & Ranathunga, S. (2021) · Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon) · doi:10.1109/mercon52712.2021.9525789
Training Dynamic based data filtering may not work for NLP datasets
Talukdar, A., Dagar, M., Gupta, P., & Menon, V. (2021) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.22
Analiza sentimenta komentarjev hotelov z uporabo slovarjev in metode Naivni Bayes
Murks, N., Omerzu, A., & Boškovič, B. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.15
A Comparison Framework for Product Matching Algorithms
Foxcroft, J. (2021) · The Atrium (University of Guelph)
Časovni razporejevalniki in brezstrežniško okolje
Zagoranski, U. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.16
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
