The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,901–4,000 of 4,692
ToddlerBERTa: Exploiting BabyBERTa for Grammar Learning and Language Understanding
Veysel Çağatan, Ö. (2023) · Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.14 · Cited by 1
Emergent Properties of Finetuned Language Representation ModelsPreprint
Matton, A., & de Oliveira, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10832 · Cited by 3
Gestalt: a Stacking Ensemble for SQuAD2.0Preprint
El-Geish, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.07067 · Cited by 2
SeqDialN: Sequential Visual Dialog Networks in Joint Visual-Linguistic Representation SpacePreprint
Yang, L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.00397 · Cited by 1
Improving NER's Performance with Massive financial corpusPreprint
Zhang, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.15871 · Cited by 1
Inno at SemEval-2020 Task 11: Leveraging Pure Transformer for Multi-Class Propaganda DetectionPreprint
Grigorev, D., & Ivanov, V. V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.11584 · Cited by 1
Shimpi, S., Thombre, S., Reddy, S. A., Sharma, R., & Singh, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.05651 · Cited by 1
AutoADR: Automatic Model Design for Ad RelevancePreprint
Chen, Y., Yang, Y., Sun, H., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07075 · Cited by 1
Cross-lingual Transferring of Pre-trained Contextualized Language ModelsPreprint
Li, Z., Parnow, K., Zhao, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, R., Utiyama, M., & Sumita, E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.12627 · Cited by 5
Is the User Enjoying the Conversation? A Case Study on the Impact on the Reward FunctionPreprint
Rojas-Barahona, L. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.05004 · Cited by 2
On The Connection of Benford's Law and Neural Networks.Preprint
Sahu, S. K., Java, A., & Shaikh, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Customizing Contextualized Language Models forLegal Document ReviewsPreprint
Shaghaghian, S., Luna, Feng, Jafarpour, B., & Pogrebnyakov, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.05757 · Cited by 1
Thakker, U., Whatmough, P. N., Liu, Z., Mattina, M., & Beu, J. G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.07071 · Cited by 2
Efficient transfer learning for NLP with ELECTRAPreprint
Mercier, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02756 · Cited by 1
HumAID: Human-Annotated Disaster Incidents Data from Twitter with Deep Learning Benchmarks
Alam, F., Qazi, U., Imran, M., & Ofli, F. (2021) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/a7nvf7 · Cited by 1
Hierarchical Transformer Networks for Longitudinal Clinical Document Classification.Preprint
Si, Y., & Roberts, K. E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
On the Robustness of Goal Oriented Dialogue Systems to Real-world Noise.Preprint
Krone, J., Sengupta, S., & Mansoor, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Guiding the Growth: Difficulty-Controllable Question Generation through Step-by-Step RewritingPreprint
Cheng, Y. D., Li, S., Liu, B., Zhao, R., Li, S., Lin, C., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.11698 · Cited by 1
Positional Artefacts Propagate Through Masked Language Model EmbeddingsPreprint
Luo, Z., Kulmizev, A., & Mao, X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.04393 · Cited by 1
Towards humanized open-domain conversational agents
Zhong, P. (2021) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/147791 · Cited by 1
SMURF: SeMantic and linguistic UndeRstanding Fusion for Caption Evaluation via Typicality AnalysisPreprint
Feinglass, J., & Yang, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.01444 · Cited by 1
MergeDistill: Merging Pre-trained Language Models using DistillationPreprint
Khanuja, S., Johnson, M., & Talukdar, P. P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02834 · Cited by 1
Liu, P., Gao, Z.-F., Zhao, W. X., Xie, Z. Y., Lu, Z.-Y., & Wen, J.-R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02205 · Cited by 1
Efficient Inference via Universal LSH KernelPreprint
Liu, Z., Coleman, B., & Shrivastava, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.11426 · Cited by 1
Will Multi-modal Data Improves Few-shot Learning?Preprint
Zhang, Z., Ma, S., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.11853 · Cited by 1
Leveraging Commonsense Knowledge on Classifying False News and Determining Checkworthiness of ClaimsPreprint
Schlicht, I. B., Sezerer, E., Tekır, S., Han, O., & Boukhers, Z. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.03731 · Cited by 1
Automatic Claim Review for Climate Science via Explanation GenerationPreprint
Bhatia, S., Lau, J. H., & Baldwin, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.14740 · Cited by 4
Your fairness may vary: Group fairness of pretrained language models in toxic text classification.Preprint
Baldini, I., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K. N., Yurochkin, M., & Singh, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Detection of Criminal Texts for the Polish State Border GuardPreprint
Nowakowski, A., & Jassem, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.10580 · Cited by 3
Short Text Classification with Tolerance Near Sets
Patel, V. (2021) · doi:10.36939/ir.202108231232 · Cited by 1
Learning Neural Models for Natural Language Processing in the Face of Distributional ShiftPreprint
Michel, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01558 · Cited by 2
Huang, D., Zeng, Q., Xiong, Y., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460567 · Cited by 1
Overview of Tencent Multi-modal Ads Video Understanding ChallengePreprint
Wang, Z., Wu, L., Li, Z., Xiong, J., & Lu, Q. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.07951 · Cited by 1
MemBERT: Injecting Unstructured Knowledge into BERTPreprint
Ruggeri, F., Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
A Fast Randomized Algorithm for Massive Text NormalizationPreprint
Jiang, N., Luo, C., Lakshman, V., Dattatreya, Y., & Xue, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03024 · Cited by 1
MMIU: Dataset for Visual Intent Understanding in Multimodal AssistantsPreprint
Patel, A., Moniz, J. R. A., Nguyen, R. H., Tzou, N., Kotek, H., & Renkens, V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06416 · Cited by 1
Transformer with a Mixture of Gaussian Keys.Preprint
Nguyen, T., Nguyen, T. M., Le, D. D., Nguyen, K. C. D., Tran, A. N., Baraniuk, R. G., Ho, N., & Osher, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Learning with Noisy Labels by Targeted Relabeling.Preprint
Chen, D., Yu, Z., & Bowman, S. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Metadata Shaping: Natural Language Annotations for the TailPreprint
Arora, S., Wu, S., Liu, E., & Ré, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08430 · Cited by 1
A text autoencoder from transformer for fast encoding language representationPreprint
Huang, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02844 · Cited by 2
DeepHelp: Deep Learning for Shout Crisis Text ConversationsPreprint
Cahn, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.13244 · Cited by 1
Arch-Net: Model Distillation for Architecture Agnostic Model DeploymentPreprint
Xu, W., Feng, Z., Fang, S., Yuan, S. M., Yang, Y., & Zhou, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.01135 · Cited by 1
Harmonized System Code Classification Using Transfer Learning with Pre-Trained Weights
Pain, K. (2021) · DalSpace (Dalhousie University) · Cited by 1
Pegasus@Dravidian-CodeMix-HASOC2021: Analyzing Social Media Content for Detection of Offensive TextPreprint
Jada, P. K., Yasaswini, K., Puranik, K., Anbukkarasi, S., Thangasamy, S., & Thamburaj, K. P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.09836 · Cited by 1
ConvFiT: Conversational Fine-Tuning of Pretrained Language ModelsPreprint
Vulić, I., Su, P.-H., Coope, S., Gerz, D., Budzianowski, P., Casanueva, I., Mrkšić, N., & Wen, T.-H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.10126 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of mathematical questioning strategies using data collected through weak supervisionPreprint
Datta, D., Phillips, M., Bywater, J. P., Chiu, J. L., Watson, G. S., Barnes, L. E., & Brown, D. E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.00985 · Cited by 5
CL-NERIL: A Cross-Lingual Model for NER in Indian LanguagesPreprint
Prabhakar, A., Majumder, G. S., & Anand, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.11815 · Cited by 1
Peer Review #2 of "Knowledge distillation in deep learning and its applications (v0.2)"
(2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.474v0.2/reviews/2 · Cited by 1
A Hybrid Model for Similarity Measurement of Twitter ProfilesPreprint
Shoeibi, N., Shoeibi, N., Shoeibi, N., et al. (2022) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202106.0196.v3 · Cited by 1
ASR-aware end-to-end neural diarizationPreprint
Khare, A., Han, E., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2pj8s · Cited by 1
Deep Transfer Learning & Beyond: Transformer Language Models in Information Systems ResearchPreprint
Gruetzemacher, R., & Paradice, D. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3944942 · Cited by 1
How Do Mutual Fund Investors React to Text-Based Uncertainty?Preprint
Mitali, S. F. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4259075 · Cited by 1
Analysis of Sentiment Analysis Research Trends using Text MiningPreprint
Kim, S. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21903441.v1 · Cited by 2
Analysis of Sentiment Analysis Research Trends using Text MiningPreprint
Kim, S. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21903441 · Cited by 2
A Cohesive Distillation Architecture for Neural Language ModelsPreprint
Wahle, J. P. (2023) · doi:10.22541/au.167528147.79728645/v1 · Cited by 1
Raza, S. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.02.21.23286247 · Cited by 1
Toward context-based text-to-3D scene generation
Henlein, A. (2022) · Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · doi:10.21248/gups.73448 · Cited by 1
Kim, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.20944/preprints202304.0268.v1
Improving image captioning methods using machine learning approaches
Atliha, V. (2023) · doi:10.20334/2023-021-m · Cited by 1
MULTIWD: Multiple Wellness Dimensions in Social Media PostsPreprint
Sathvik, M., & Garg, M. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22816586.v1 · Cited by 1
Zeng, W., & Huson, D. H. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.01.543218 · Cited by 1
Combining Transformers with Natural Language ExplanationsPreprint
Ruggeri, F., Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4531749 · Cited by 2
Thai tokenizer invariant classification based on bi-lstm and distilbert encoders
Kongsumran, N. (2021) · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2021.113 · Cited by 1
Leveraging Multi-Task Learning in Code-Switched settingPreprint
R, M. K. S., Pitale, O., & Malapati, A. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3328574/v1 · Cited by 1
Evolution of research topics and paradigms in plant sciencesPreprint
Shiu, S., & Lehti‐Shiu, M. D. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.02.560457 · Cited by 1
Performance and Sustainability of Bert Derivatives in Dyadic DataPreprint
Fernández, M. E., Eiras‐Franco, C., Cancela, B., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4626682 · Cited by 1
Conversational Chemistry: A Novel Approach to Chemical Search and Property PredictionPreprint
Ben-Joseph, J., & Oates, T. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.11.566721 · Cited by 1
Hubness Reduction Improves Sentence-BERT Semantic SpacesPreprint
Nielsen, B. M. G., & Hansen, L. K. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.18364 · Cited by 1
Transforming Data Coming from Social Media Streams into Disaster‐Related Information
Rossi, C., Arnaudo, E., Salza, D., Blanco, G., & Bongiovanni, L. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119741374.ch14 · Cited by 1
Bucur, A.-M., Koosha, T. A., Cosma, A., Flek, L., Thanarajah, S. E., Bernhard, F. P., Rosso, P., & Jamalabadi, H. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/p6923 · Cited by 1
ESC-Net: Overcoming language priors in VQA via enhancing visual featurePreprint
Chowdhury, S., & Soni, B. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3961102/v1 · Cited by 1
Venkatesha, Y., Kundu, S., & Panda, P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4790569 · Cited by 1
Benhamou, E. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4780220 · Cited by 1
Perspective matters: event framing in language and society
Minnema, G. (2024) · doi:10.33612/diss.999190209 · Cited by 1
Left-Digit Bias in Household Inflation ExpectationsPreprint
Garz, M., & Larin, B. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4872279 · Cited by 1
Immersive exposure to simulated visual hallucinations modulates high-level human cognitionPreprint
Greco, A., Rastelli, C., Ubaldi, A., & Riva, G. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.17.603874 · Cited by 1
Cross-Lingual Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Learning to Hate Speech DetectionPreprint
Kapil, P., & Ekbal, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4902214 · Cited by 1
Zhou, B. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qswzc · Cited by 1
Temporal Knowledge Distillation for Time Sensitive Financial Services ApplicationsPreprint
Kurshan, E., & Shen, H. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4941375 · Cited by 1
NicheFlow: Towards a foundation model for Species Distribution ModellingPreprint
Dinnage, R. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.15.618541 · Cited by 4
Huang, J., Yi, B., Sun, W., Wan, B., Xu, Y., Feng, Y., Ye, W., & Qin, Q. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5002351 · Cited by 2
Do Consumers Care? Collusion, Inattention, and the Power of InformationPreprint
Rösner, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5006839 · Cited by 1
From Transformers to the Future: An In-Depth Exploration of Modern Language Model ArchitecturesPreprint
Xu, H., Bi, Z., Tseng, H.-M., Song, X., & Feng, P. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/n8r5j · Cited by 1
Yang, L., Zhou, X., Fan, J., Xie, X., & Zhu, S. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/ev7ddp · Cited by 1
A Comprehensive Survey on the Integration of Reinforcement Learning and NLP for Stock Market TradingPreprint
Ferrell, B., & McInnes, B. T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5135573 · Cited by 1
LLM Modules: Knowledge Transfer from a Large to a Small Model Using Enhanced Cross-AttentionPreprint
Kolomeitsev, K. (2025) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/v06wud · Cited by 2
Transformer-Based Approach for Nuclear Reactor Event Sequence Forecasting and Trip DetectionPreprint
Caixeta, B. M., dos Santos, M. C., Lima, A. D., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5226606 · Cited by 1
Hechtner, F., Schmidt, L., Seebeck, A., & Weiß, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5146523 · Cited by 1
Lefort, B., Benhamou, E., Ohana, J., Guez, B., Saltiel, D., & Jacquot, T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5199096 · Cited by 6
Kurshan, E., & Shen, H. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5377719 · Cited by 1
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D’Souza, J. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r606311 · Cited by 1
Benchmark on Peer Review Toxic Detection: A Challenging Task with a New Dataset
Luo, M., Peterson, B., Gan, R., Ramalingame, H., Gangrade, N., Dimarogona, A., Banerjee, I., & Howard, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.01676 · Cited by 1
Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation
Sansford, H., Law, D. H. C., Liu, W., Tripathi, A., Agarwal, N., & Burg, G. J. J. V. D. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05839 · Cited by 2
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
Explainable Anomaly Detection for System Logs in Distributed Environments
Gu, Z., Yue, W., & Liu, C. (2026) · Computers, Materials & Continua · doi:10.32604/cmc.2026.077388
“All clients utilize the DistilBERT-base-uncased architecture [45] as the foundational model, optimized via the AdamW algorithm with learning rate η = 2 × 10 − 5 . for i = 1 to m do 16: for j = 1 to d do 17: if The original feature f j contains a hash h ∈ H ∗ then 18: Locate p ← H ∗ .index ( h ) 19:…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
