The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,801–3,900 of 4,692
Event Identification and Chronology Model of Ramayana
Paul, A., Mishra, R., Padia, N., & Das, D. (2025) · International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology (IEMENTech) · doi:10.1109/iementech65115.2025.10959436 · Cited by 1
HEET: A Performance Measure to Quantify Heterogeneity in Distributed Computing Systems
Mokhtari, A., Ghafouri, S., Jamshidi, P., et al. (2024) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC) · doi:10.1109/ucc63386.2024.00013 · Cited by 1
Zylowski, T., Wölfel, M., & Fischer, K. (2025) · Advances in analytics for learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87740-7_10 · Cited by 1
Enabling Next-Generation Smart Homes Through Bert Personalized Food Recommendations - RecipeBERT
DIVYA, M., & Beedareddy, J. S. R. (2024) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat62293.2024.00130 · Cited by 1
Schmidt, F. M., Gottifredi, S., & García, A. J. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127886 · Cited by 1
Sasaki, K., Nishikawa, H., Taniguchi, I., & Onoye, T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3574169 · Cited by 1
Bangla News Document Categorization using Deep Learning Approaches and Fine-tuned BERT
Azim, M. A., Uddin, M. G., Islam, M. K., & Chy, A. N. (2025) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2025924469 · Cited by 1
Al-harbi, N. K., & Alghieth, M. (2025) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2025.0160544 · Cited by 1
Rahman, S., Tariq, T. B., Jahan, N., Naime, N. H., & Akhter, N. (2024) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11022022 · Cited by 1
Target Speech Detection With Multimodal Prompts
Jiang, Y., Tao, R., Chen, Z., Qian, Y., & Li, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3579304 · Cited by 1
Graph-Based Data Augmentation and Label Noise Identification for Entity Resolution
Rettenmeier, T., & Jesser, A. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7005-5_4 · Cited by 1
Multimodal deep learning model for bitcoin price prediction with news and market prices
Vardhan, G. V., & Subburaj, B. (2025) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11432-x · Cited by 1
Shimada, K., Uchida, K., Koyama, Y., Shibuya, T., Takahashi, S., Mitsufuji, Y., & Kawahara, T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3587455 · Cited by 3
Thakur, N. (2024) · IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · doi:10.1109/iemcon62851.2024.11093522 · Cited by 1
Improving the Contextual Understanding of LLMs Through Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation and RAG
Ippili, Y., Jain, V. K., Dixit, Y., Saraf, G., & Prasad, V. R. B. (2025) · International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI) · doi:10.1109/ecai65401.2025.11095547 · Cited by 1
Cheap Learning: Maximizing Performance of Language Models for Social Data Science Using Minimal Data
Castro-González, L., Chung, Y.-L., Kirk, H. R., Francis, J., Williams, A. R., Johansson, P., & Bright, J. (2025) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/00491241251340608 · Cited by 2
A cross-modal attention self-distillation network focusing on local segments of emotional dialogue
Chen, H., Xu, Y., Li, P., Kang, H. S., & Jin, G. (2025) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2025.101864 · Cited by 1
Developing a General-Purpose System for Intentionality Detection in Dialogue Using Neural Networks
Nguyen, T. M., & Samsonovich, A. V. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00800-8_2 · Cited by 1
Ihm, J., & Baek, Y. M. (2025) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-025-00760-0 · Cited by 1
Raghunathan, K., Syed, D., Zainab, A., Vuppala, M., Özhan, D., & Refaat, S. S. (2025) · International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets) · doi:10.1109/smartnets65254.2025.11106844 · Cited by 1
StyleCloak: Anonymous Source Coding for Textual Attribute Obfuscation with Semantic Fidelity
Yin, J., Wei, Z., Masouros, C., et al. (2025) · IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/icccworkshops67136.2025.11148197 · Cited by 1
Lim, T. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2025.2609644 · Cited by 2
Exploratory models of human-AI teams
Nguyen, D., Cohen, M. C., Kao, H.-T., Engberson, G., Penafiel, L., Lynch, S., McCormack, R., Cassani, L., & Volkova, S. (2025) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.24052.ngu · Cited by 1
Accelerating Natural Language Understanding in Task-Oriented Dialog
Ahuja, O., & Desai, S. (2020) · Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI (NLP4ConvAI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlp4convai-1.6 · Cited by 1
Learning Neural Textual Representations for Citation Recommendation
Kieu, B. T., Unanue, I. J., Pham, S. B., Phan, H. X., & Piccardi, M. (2021) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412725 · Cited by 2
Olizarenko, S., & Argunov, V. (2020) · Advanced Information Systems · doi:10.20998/2522-9052.2020.3.13 · Cited by 1
RGCL at SemEval-2020 Task 6: Neural Approaches to DefinitionExtraction
Ranasinghe, T., Plum, A., Orǎsan, C., & Mitkov, R. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.94 · Cited by 1
Putri, W. C., Hidayat, R. A., Khasanah, I. N., & Mahendra, R. (2020) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.74 · Cited by 1
IRLab@IITBHU at WNUT-2020 Task 2: Identification of informative COVID-19 English Tweets using BERT
Chanda, S., Nandy, E., & Pal, S. (2020) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.56 · Cited by 1
Large Product Key Memory for Pretrained Language Models
Kim, G., & Jung, T. H. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.362 · Cited by 5
Knowledge distillation and data augmentation for NLP light pre-trained models
Luo, H., Li, Y., Wang, X., et al. (2020) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1651/1/012043 · Cited by 1
UI at SemEval-2020 Task 4: Commonsense Validation and Explanation by Exploiting Contradiction
Doxolodeo, K., & Mahendra, R. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.78 · Cited by 1
Monitoring Social Media to Identify Environmental Crimes through NLP A Preliminary Study
Manna, R., Pascucci, A., Zarino, W. P., Simoniello, V., & Monti, J. (2020) · Accademia University Press eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.8675 · Cited by 1
IDS at SemEval-2020 Task 10: Does Pre-trained Language Model Know What to Emphasize?
Shin, J., Kim, T., & Lee, S.-G. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.185 · Cited by 1
nlpUP at SemEval-2020 Task 12 : A Blazing Fast System for Offensive Language Detection
Hamdy, E., Mitrović, J., & Granitzer, M. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.278 · Cited by 1
PMap: Ensemble Pre-training Models for Product Matching.
Kertkeidkachorn, N., & Ichise, R. (2020) · Cited by 1
UniBO @ KIPoS: Fine-tuning the Italian "BERTology" for PoS-tagging Spoken Data (short paper).
Tamburini, F. (2020) · Cited by 1
Extracting Adherence Information from Electronic Health Records
Sanders, J., Gudala, M., Hamilton, K., Prasad, N., Godfrey-Stovall, J., Blanco, E., Hamilton, J. E., & Roberts, K. E. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.60 · Cited by 2
Sáenz, C. A. C., Dias, M., & Becker, K. E. (2020) · doi:10.5753/kdmile.2020.11978 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Cross-lingual Semantic Annotations using Deep Network Sentence Embeddings
Lin, Y.-C., Hoffmann, P., & Rahm, E. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC) · doi:10.5220/0010256801880199 · Cited by 1
Sequential Transfer Learning for Event Detection and Key Sentence Extraction
Ollagnier, A., & Williams, H. T. P. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla51294.2020.00166 · Cited by 1
Knowledge distillation application technology for Chinese NLP
Luo, H., Wang, X., Yu, W., et al. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications (ICPECA) · doi:10.1109/icpeca51329.2021.9362719 · Cited by 1
Fleming, M., Dondeti, P., Dreisbach, C., & Poliak, A. (2021) · Social Media Mining for Health Research and Applications Workshop and Shared Tasks (SMM4H) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.smm4h-1.28 · Cited by 2
The Chinese Remainder Theorem for Compact, Task-Precise, Efficient and Secure Word Embeddings
Thaine, P., & Penn, G. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.306 · Cited by 1
Improving BERT Pretraining with Syntactic SupervisionPreprint
Tziafas, G., Kogkalidis, K., Wijnholds, G., & Moortgat, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.10516 · Cited by 1
MOROCCO: Model Resource Comparison Framework
Malykh, V., Kukushkin, A., Tikhonova, M., & Shavrina, T. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67826-4_20 · Cited by 1
Investigation of text data augmentation for transformer training via translation technique
Šeputis, D. (2021) · Vilnius University Open Series · doi:10.15388/lmitt.2021.11 · Cited by 1
Montanti @ HaSpeeDe2 EVALITA 2020: Hate Speech Detection inOnline Contents
Bisconti, E., & Montagnani, M. (2020) · Accademia University Press eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.7067 · Cited by 1
Understanding Transformers for Information Extraction with Limited Data.
Nguyen, M.-T., Le, D. T., Sơn, N. H., Minh, B. C., Duong, D. H. T., & Le, L. (2020) · Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation · Cited by 1
Sharma, A., Jayakumar, J., Mitra, P. P., Chakraborti, S., & Kumar, P. S. (2021) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-021-00443-6 · Cited by 1
Decoupes, R., Kafando, R., Mathieu Roche, A., & Teisseire, M. (2021) · AGILE GIScience Series · doi:10.5194/agile-giss-2-2-2021 · Cited by 1
Continual Quality Estimation with Online Bayesian Meta-Learning
Obamuyide, A., Fomicheva, M., & Specia, L. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.25 · Cited by 1
Proof Net Structure for Neural Lambek Categorial Parsing
Bhargava, A., & Penn, G. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.iwpt-1.2 · Cited by 1
Learn The Big Picture: Representation Learning for Clustering
Kashyapi, S., & Dietz, L. (2021) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.repl4nlp-1.15 · Cited by 1
How does BERT process disfluency?
Tian, Y., Nieradzik, T., Jalali, S., & Shiu, D.-S. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.sigdial-1.22 · Cited by 2
Changing the Basis of Contextual Representations with Explicit Semantics
Ficsor, T., & Berend, G. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-srw.25 · Cited by 2
Zhou, X., Wu, B., & Fung, P. (2021) · Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) · Cited by 1
Classification-based Quality Estimation: Small and Efficient Models for Real-world Applications
Sun, S., El-Kishky, A., Chaudhary, V., Cross, J., Specia, L., & Guzmán, F. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.474 · Cited by 1
Detecting Offensive Content on Social Media During Anti-Lockdown Protests in Michigan
Moon, J.-H., Nguyen, H. M., Pines, B., & Gokhale, S. S. (2021) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00068 · Cited by 1
KnowMAN: Weakly Supervised Multinomial Adversarial Networks
März, L., Asgari, E., Braune, F., Zimmermann, F., & Roth, B. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.751 · Cited by 1
Pavanelli, L., Schneider, E. T. R., Gumiel, Y. B., Ferreira, T. C., de Oliveira, L. F. A., de Souza, J. V. A., Paiva, G. P. M., Oliveira, L. E. S. E., Moro, C. M. C., Paraíso, E. C., et al. (2021) · IberLEF@SEPLN · Cited by 1
Yousef, T., Schlaf, A., Borst, J., et al. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-demo.18 · Cited by 1
Cross-Lingual Wolastoqey-English Definition Modelling
Bear, D., & Cook, P. F. (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_017 · Cited by 1
ProSPer: Probing Human and Neural Network Language Model Understanding of Spatial Perspective
Masis, T., & Anderson, C. J. (2021) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.8 · Cited by 1
Decoupled Transformer for Scalable Inference in Open-domain Question Answering
Facebook, ElFadeel, H., Peshterliev, S., & Facebook (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_044 · Cited by 3
The Phenomenon of Resonance in Knowledge Distillation: Learning Students by Non-strong Teachers
Terekhov, V. I., & Ishkov, D. O. (2021) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91581-0_4 · Cited by 1
A Preliminary Evaluation of a Privacy-Preserving Dialogue System.
Fazzinga, B., Galassi, A., & Torroni, P. (2021) · Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · Cited by 1
Prediction of Number of Likes and Retweets based on the Features of Tweet Text and Images
Amitani, R., Matsumoto, K., Yoshida, M., & Kita, K. (2021) · International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval (NLPIR) · doi:10.1145/3508230.3508244 · Cited by 1
Pass off Fish Eyes for Pearls: Attacking Model Selection of Pre-trained Models
Zhu, B., Qin, Y., Qi, F., Deng, Y. S., Liu, Z., Sun, M., & Gu, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.347 · Cited by 1
UMUTeam@LT-EDI-ACL2022: Detecting Signs of Depression from text
García-Díaz, J. A., & Valencia‐García, R. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.ltedi-1.17 · Cited by 1
Benlahbib, A., Alami, H., & Alami, A. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.139 · Cited by 1
IIIT-MLNS at SemEval-2022 Task 8: Siamese Architecture for Modeling Multilingual News Similarity
Joshi, S., Taunk, D., & Varma, V. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.161 · Cited by 1
UoR-NCL at SemEval-2022 Task 3: Fine-Tuning the BERT-Based Models for Validating Taxonomic Relations
Markchom, T., Liang, H., & Chen, J. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.33 · Cited by 1
Analysis of the Covid-19 Process in Terms of Health Managers
Palavar, Y. E., Celik, Z., Albayrak, A., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1109/icmi55296.2022.9873660 · Cited by 1
Action Unit Generation through Dimensional Emotion Recognition from Text
Bucci, B., Rossi, A., & Rossi, S. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900535 · Cited by 1
Sentiment Analysis and Stance Detection on German YouTube Comments on Gender Diversity
Melnyk, L., & Feld, L. (2022) · Journal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Research · doi:10.4995/jclr.2022.18224 · Cited by 1
Liu, Y., & Xie, X. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892830 · Cited by 2
Distilled Model for Russian News Clustering: much lighter and faster, still accurate
Trofimchuk, D. (2022) · Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies · doi:10.28995/2075-7182-2022-21-538-549 · Cited by 1
Conditional Cross Correlation Network for Video Question Answering
Ouenniche, K., Țapu, R., & Zaharia, T. B. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc56153.2023.00011 · Cited by 1
TranSQL: A Transformer-based Model for Classifying SQL Queries
Tahmasebi, S., Payberah, A. H., Soylu, A., Roman, D., & Matskin, M. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla55696.2022.00131 · Cited by 1
Novel Knowledge Distillation to Improve Training Accuracy of Spin-based SNN
Li, H., Lone, A. H., Tian, F., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS) · doi:10.1109/aicas57966.2023.10168575 · Cited by 1
Arizonans at SemEval-2023 Task 9: Multilingual Tweet Intimacy Analysis with XLM-T
Bozdag, N. B., Bilgis, T., & Bethard, S. J. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.230 · Cited by 1
Model-Based Simulation for Optimising Smart Reply
Towle, B., & Zhou, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.672 · Cited by 1
Francis Wilde at SemEval-2023 Task 5: Clickbait Spoiler Type Identification with Transformers
Indurthi, V., & Varma, V. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.260 · Cited by 1
Dhrangadhariya, A., Kusa, W., Müller, H., & Hanbury, A. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.246 · Cited by 1
CKingCoder at SemEval-2023 Task 9: Multilingual Tweet Intimacy Analysis
Harish, B., Naveen, D., Balasubramanian, P., & Aarthi, S. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.276 · Cited by 1
Karimi, A., & Flek, L. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.292 · Cited by 1
Partially-Random Initialization: A Smoking Gun for Binarization Hypothesis of BERT
Ardakani, A. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.191 · Cited by 1
T-STAR: Truthful Style Transfer using AMR Graph as Intermediate Representation
Jangra, A., Nema, P., & Raghuveer, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.602 · Cited by 2
Is Multimodal Vision Supervision Beneficial to Language?
Madasu, A., & Lal, V. (2023) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00263 · Cited by 1
Zhang, H., Wu, Y., Lu, J., Bai, Z., Wu, J., Lin, H., & Zhang, S. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.106 · Cited by 2
teamPN at TSAR-2022 Shared Task: Lexical Simplification using Multi-Level and Modular Approach
Katyal, N., & Rajpoot, P. K. (2022) · Workshop on Text Simplification, Accessibility and Readability (TSAR) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.tsar-1.26 · Cited by 1
Self-Adaptive Named Entity Recognition by Retrieving Unstructured Knowledge
Nishida, K., Yoshinaga, N., & Nishida, K. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.233 · Cited by 1
Long-Tail Theory Under Gaussian Mixtures
Bolatov, A., Tezekbayev, M., Melnykov, I. V., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230260 · Cited by 1
How Well Do You Know Your Audience? Toward Socially-aware Question Generation
Stewart, I., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.sigdial-1.27 · Cited by 1
Alamgir, R. M., & Haque, A. (2023) · Workshop on Bangla Language Processing (BLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.banglalp-1.18 · Cited by 1
Samo, G., Năstase, V., Jiang, C., & Merlo, P. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.821 · Cited by 1
Towards Zero-Shot Frame Semantic Parsing with Task Agnostic Ontologies and Simple Labels
Ribeiro, D. N., Goetz, J., Abdar, O., Ross, M., Dong, A., Forbus, K. D., & Mohamed, A. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.pandl-1.6 · Cited by 1
A surprisal oracle for active curriculum language modeling
Hong, X., Loáiciga, S., & Sayeed, A. (2023) · BabyLM Challenge · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.22 · Cited by 1
Byte-ranked Curriculum Learning for BabyLM Strict-small Shared Task 2023
DeBenedetto, J. (2023) · BabyLM Challenge · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.17 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
