CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 913Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation

Open access
Almheiri, Ahmed, Hartman, Thomas, Maldacena, Juan, Shaghoulian, Edgar, Tajdini, Amirhossein·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1911.12333arXiv 1911.12333
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The information paradox can be realized in anti-de Sitter spacetime joined to a Minkowski region. In this setting, we show that the large discrepancy between the von Neumann entropy as calculated by Hawking and the requirements of unitarity is fixed by including new saddles in the gravitational path integral. These saddles arise in the replica method as complexified wormholes connecting different copies of the black hole. As the replica number $n \to 1$, the presence of these wormholes leads to the island rule for the computation of the fine-grained gravitational entropy. We discuss these replica wormholes explicitly in two-dimensional Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity coupled to matter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1911.12333

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The minimum of the disconnected and completely connected topologies dominates the path integral and gives the unitary Page curve.

    “The minimum of the two dominates the path integral and gives the unitary Page curve, see [70,71] (see also [24,84]).”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [71]

  • The island formula (8.2) for the entropy of Hawking radiation can be derived from replica wormholes.

    “We focus on the island formula (8.2) for the entropy of the Hawking radiation [70,71].”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [71]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 77 · Cited by 913

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. D.N. Page, Time dependence of Hawking radiation entropy, JCAP 09 (2013) 028 [arXiv:1301.4995] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox, arXiv:1905.08255 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  5. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1908.10996] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. T.G. Mertens, Towards black hole evaporation in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, JHEP 07 (2019) 097 [arXiv:1903.10485] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. C. Akers, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Large breakdowns of entanglement wedge reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126006 [arXiv:1908.03975] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. U. Moitra, S.K. Sake, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal, Jackiw-Teitelboim model coupled to conformal matter in the semi-classical limit, JHEP 04 (2020) 199 [arXiv:1908.08523] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, arXiv:1911.09666 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  11. Z. Fu and D. Marolf, Bag-of-gold spacetimes, Euclidean wormholes and inflation from domain walls in AdS/CFT, JHEP 11 (2019) 040 [arXiv:1909.02505] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  12. P. Zhang, Evaporation dynamics of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 245104 [arXiv:1909.10637] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow, Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation, arXiv:1910.00972 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  14. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, Islands outside the horizon, arXiv:1910.11077 [INSPIRE]. JHEP05(2020)013 · arXiv
  15. M. Rozali et al., Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes, arXiv:1910.12836 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  16. H.Z. Chen et al., Information flow in black hole evaporation, JHEP 03 (2020) 152 [arXiv:1911.03402] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. R. Bousso and M. Tomašević, Unitarity from a smooth horizon?, arXiv:1911.06305 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  18. D.L. Jafferis and D.K. Kolchmeyer, Entanglement entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, arXiv:1911.10663 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  19. A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Eigenbranes in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, arXiv:1911.11603 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  20. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  21. V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. S.D. Mathur, What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?, arXiv:1402.6378 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  25. R. Jackiw, Lower dimensional gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian structure in two space-time dimensions, Phys. Lett. 126B (1983) 41 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  27. A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 11 (2015) 014 [arXiv:1402.6334] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  28. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP 11 (2016) 028 [arXiv:1607.07506] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, extremality, Euclidean variations and the equations of motion, JHEP 01 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1705.08453] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, arXiv:1911.11977 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  32. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in Anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  33. P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, arXiv:1806.06840 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  34. P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  35. P. Saad, Late time correlation functions, baby universes and ETH in JT gravity, arXiv:1910.10311 [INSPIRE]. JHEP05(2020)013 · arXiv
  36. J.V. Rocha, Evaporation of large black holes in AdS: coupling to the evaporon, JHEP 08 (2008) 075 [arXiv:0804.0055] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  37. J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde, An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 07 (2016) 139 [arXiv:1606.03438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  40. J. Maldacena, A. Milekhin and F. Popov, Traversable wormholes in four dimensions, arXiv:1807.04726 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  41. T.M. Fiola, J. Preskill, A. Strominger and S.P. Trivedi, Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3987 [hep-th/9403137] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  42. C.G. Callan Jr. and F. Wilczek, On geometric entropy, Phys. Lett. B 333 (1994) 55 [hep-th/9401072] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  43. H. Casini and M. Huerta, Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 504007 [arXiv:0905.2562] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. X. Dong, Holographic entanglement entropy for general higher derivative gravity, JHEP 01 (2014) 044 [arXiv:1310.5713] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. E. Sharon and D. Mumford, 2D-shape analysis using conformal mapping, Int. J. Computer Vision 70 (2006) 55. · DOI
  46. K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS 2 holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 111601 [arXiv:1605.06098] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  47. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [arXiv:1606.01857] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  49. H. Casini, C.D. Fosco and M. Huerta, Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions, J. Stat. Mech. 0507 (2005) P07007 [cond-mat/0505563] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  50. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the alpha-bits of black holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1807.06041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Approximate quantum error correction revisited: introducing the alpha-bit, arXiv:1706.09434. · arXiv
  52. D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1512.06431] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  53. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  54. A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [arXiv:1411.7041] [INSPIRE]. JHEP05(2020)013 · DOI · Paper page
  55. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  56. S.W. Hawking, Quantum coherence down the wormhole, Phys. Lett. B 195 (1987) 337 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. S.B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Axion induced topology change in quantum gravity and string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 890 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  58. S.R. Coleman, Black holes as red herrings: topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence, Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 867 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  59. S.B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 854 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  60. J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, A possible resolution of the black hole information puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7403 [hep-th/9407008] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  61. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time evolution of entanglement entropy from black hole interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  62. L. Susskind, Entanglement is not enough, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 49 [arXiv:1411.0690] · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaghoulian, Edgar
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
2020
Issue
5
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1911.12333
arXiv
1911.12333
OpenAlex
W2991362355
Cited by
913
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 1
FWCI
64.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0020397, DESC0009988)
  • University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
replica wormholes, black hole information paradox, anti-de Sitter space, von Neumann entropy, unitarity, gravitational path integral, island rule, replica method, Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, two-dimensional gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review