PreprintCited by 290Natural Language Processing TechniquesTopic ModelingText Readability and Simplification

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text

Open access

Clark, Elizabeth, August, Tal, Serrano, Sofia, Haduong, Nikita, Gururangan, Suchin, Smith, Noah A.·2021·arXiv

DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2107.00061arXiv 2107.00061

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Human evaluations are typically considered the gold standard in natural language generation, but as models' fluency improves, how well can evaluators detect and judge machine-generated text? We run a study assessing non-experts' ability to distinguish between human- and machine-authored text (GPT2 and GPT3) in three domains (stories, news articles, and recipes). We find that, without training, evaluators distinguished between GPT3- and human-authored text at random chance level. We explore three approaches for quickly training evaluators to better identify GPT3-authored text (detailed instructions, annotated examples, and paired examples) and find that while evaluators' accuracy improved up to 55%, it did not significantly improve across the three domains. Given the inconsistent results across text domains and the often contradictory reasons evaluators gave for their judgments, we examine the role untrained human evaluations play in NLG evaluation and provide recommendations to NLG researchers for improving human evaluations of text generated from state-of-the-art models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.00061

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950)
Turing, A. M. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250791.003.0017 · Cited by 6,120
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation
Liu, C., Lowe, R., Serban, I. V., Noseworthy, M., Charlin, L., & Pineau, J. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1230 · Cited by 1,377
Hierarchical Neural Story Generation
Fan, A., Lewis, M., & Dauphin, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1082 · Cited by 1,266
Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia
Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2008) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1460563.1460572 · Cited by 700
Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside
Bernstein, M. S., Little, G., Miller, R. C., Hartmann, B., Ackerman, M. S., Karger, D. R., Crowell, D., & Panovich, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/1866029.1866078 · Cited by 686
GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text
Gehrmann, S., Strobelt, H., & Rush, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-3019 · Cited by 470
Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG
Novikova, J., Dušek, O., Cercas Curry, A., & Rieser, V. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1238 · Cited by 422
(Meta-) evaluation of machine translation
Callison-Burch, C., Fordyce, C. S., Koehn, P., Monz, C., & Schroeder, J. (2007) · Conference on Machine Translation (WMT) · doi:10.3115/1626355.1626373 · Cited by 381

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert- Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877-1901.
Florian Daniel, Pavel Kucherbaev, Cinzia Cappiello, Boualem Benatallah, and Mohammad Allahbakhsh. 2018. Quality control in crowdsourcing: A survey of quality attributes, assessment techniques, and as- surance actions. In ACM Computing Surveys, vol- ume 51. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
Stephanie Schoch, Diyi Yang, and Yangfeng Ji. 2020. "This is a problem, don't you agree?" Framing and bias in human evaluation for natural language gener- ation. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Evalu- ating NLG Evaluation, pages 10-16, Online (Dublin, Ireland). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. 2019a. HellaSwag: Can a machine really finish your sentence? In Pro- ceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics, pages 4791- 4800, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Hannah Rashkin, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, Franziska Roesner, and Yejin Choi. 2019b. Defending against neural fake news. In Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, volume 32.

Sorted by citations

On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6 · Cited by 1,099
Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond
Perkins, M. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.02.07 · Cited by 839
Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed
Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2208839120 · Cited by 342
A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4
Kalyan, K. S. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100048 · Cited by 335
Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?
Chiang, C.-H., & Lee, H.-Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.870 · Cited by 331
On the conversational persuasiveness of GPT-4
Salvi, F., Ribeiro, M. H., Gallotti, R., & West, R. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02194-6 · Cited by 480
AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans
Spitale, G., Biller-Andorno, N., & Germani, F. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh1850 · Cited by 241
The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution
Yeadon, W., Inyang, O.-O., Mizouri, A., Peach, A., & Testrow, C. P. (2023) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/acc5cf · Cited by 199
Detection of GPT-4 generated text in higher education: Combining academic judgement and software to identify generative AI tool misuse
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2024) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6 · Cited by 234
Machine-Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methods
Crothers, E. N., Japkowicz, N., & Viktor, H. L. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294090 · Cited by 196
A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions
Wu, J., Yang, S., Zhan, R., Yuan, Y., Chao, L. S., & Wong, D. F. (2025) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00549 · Cited by 212
Artificial intelligence chatbots in academic libraries: the rise of ChatGPT
Adetayo, A. J. (2023) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-01-2023-0007 · Cited by 147
Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitations
Li, Z., Zhu, H., Lu, Z., & Yin, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.647 · Cited by 139
Evaluating Reading Comprehension Exercises Generated by LLMs: A Showcase of ChatGPT in Education Applications
Xiao, C., Xu, S. X., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., & Xia, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.52 · Cited by 138
AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably
Porter, B., & Machery, E. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76900-1 · Cited by 133
Scalable watermarking for identifying large language model outputs
Dathathri, S., See, A., Ghaisas, S., Huang, P.-S., McAdam, R., Welbl, J., Bachani, V., Kaskasoli, A., Stanforth, R., Matejovicova, T., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08025-4 · Cited by 132
The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Text
Tang, R., Chuang, Y.-N., & Hu, X. (2024) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3624725 · Cited by 125
WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creation
Liu, A., Swayamdipta, S., Smith, N. A., & Choi, Y. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.508 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
ChatGPT for Cybersecurity: Practical Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
Al-Hawawreh, M., Aljuhani, A., & Jararweh, Y. (2023) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-023-04124-5 · Cited by 124
Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMs
Sap, M., Le Bras, R., Fried, D., & Choi, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.248 · Cited by 118
Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text
Gehrmann, S., Clark, E., & Sellam, T. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13715 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey
Chang, T. A., & Bergen, B. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00492 · Cited by 105
When and How to Use AI in the Design Process? Implications for Human-AI Design Collaboration
Lee, S.-Y., Law, M., & Hoffman, G. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2353451 · Cited by 97
Virtual Patients Using Large Language Models: Scalable, Contextualized Simulation of Clinician-Patient Dialogue With Feedback
Cook, D. A., Overgaard, J., Pankratz, V. S., Del Fiol, G., & Aakre, C. A. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/68486 · Cited by 96
“We considered but omitted a domain for fluency because recent literature suggests that fluency can be presumed for contemporary AI models [42,44,46].”
Narrative transportation: How stories shape how we see ourselves and the world
Green, M. C., & Appel, M. (2024) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.03.002 · Cited by 133
“The less I type, the better”: How AI Language Models can Enhance or Impede Communication for AAC Users
Valencia, S., Cave, R., Kallarackal, K., Seaver, K., Terry, M., & Kane, S. K. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581560 · Cited by 97
Is GPT-3 text indistinguishable from human text? Scarecrow: A framework for scrutinizing machine text
Dou, Y., Forbes, M., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Smith, N., & Choi, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.501 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the Landscape of Diverse Automated Correction Strategies
Pan, L., Saxon, M., Xu, W., Nathani, D., Wang, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00660 · Cited by 86
Generative AI detection in higher education assessments
Ardito, C. G. (2025) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.20624 · Cited by 86
Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language
Nelson, A. S., Santamaría, P. V., Javens, J. S., & Ricaurte, M. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15050611 · Cited by 79
Creating a large language model of a philosopher
Schwitzgebel, E., Schwitzgebel, D., & Strasser, A. (2024) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12466 · Cited by 73
LaMPost: Design and Evaluation of an AI-assisted Email Writing Prototype for Adults with Dyslexia
Goodman, S. M., Buehler, E., Clary, P., Coenen, A., Donsbach, A., Horne, T. N., Lahav, M., MacDonald, R., Michaels, R. B., Narayanan, A., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3517428.3544819 · Cited by 71
On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models
Pan, Y., Pan, L., Chen, W., Nakov, P., Kan, M.-Y., & Wang, W. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.97 · Cited by 210
Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet
Yang, K., & Menczer, F. (2024) · Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2024.icwsm.7 · Cited by 71
UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning
Masry, A., Kavehzadeh, P., Long, X., Hoque, E., & Joty, S. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.906 · Cited by 186
Detecting ChatGPT-generated essays in a large-scale writing assessment: Is there a bias against non-native English speakers?
Jiang, Y., Hao, J., Fauss, M., & Li, C. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105070 · Cited by 68
A Confederacy of Models: a Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs on Creative Writing
Gómez‐Rodríguez, C., & Williams, P. A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.966 · Cited by 145
Linguistic Markers of Inherently False AI Communication and Intentionally False Human Communication: Evidence From Hotel Reviews
Markowitz, D. M., Hancock, J. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2023) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x231200201 · Cited by 81
Distinguishing ChatGPT(-3.5, -4)-generated and human-written papers through Japanese stylometric analysis
Zaitsu, W., & Jin, M. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288453 · Cited by 77
Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluation
Liu, Y., Fabbri, A. R., Liu, P., Zhao, Y., Nan, L., Han, R., Han, S., Joty, S., Wu, C.-S., Xiong, C., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.228 · Cited by 108
AI-driven disinformation: a framework for organizational preparation and response
Karinshak, E., & Jin, Y. (2023) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/jcom-09-2022-0113 · Cited by 78
The Perils of Using Mechanical Turk to Evaluate Open-Ended Text Generation
Karpinska, M., Akoury, N., & Iyyer, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.97 · Cited by 56
People devalue generative AI’s competence but not its advice in addressing societal and personal challenges
BOHM, R. M., Jörling, M., Reiter, L., & Fuchs, C. (2023) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-023-00032-x · Cited by 67
Real or fake text?: Investigating human ability to detect boundaries between human-written and machine-generated text
Dugan, L., Ippolito, D., Kirubarajan, A., Shi, S., & Callison-Burch, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26501 · Cited by 54
Generative AI in Higher Education: Uncertain Students, Ambiguous Use Cases, and Mercenary Perspectives
Stone, B. W. (2025) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00986283241305398 · Cited by 54
A Systematic Investigation of Commonsense Knowledge in Large Language Models
Li, X. L., Kuncoro, A., Hoffmann, J., d’Autume, C. D. M., Blunsom, P., & Nematzadeh, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.812 · Cited by 84
Writing with AI: What College Students Learned from Utilizing ChatGPT for a Writing Assignment
Wang, C., Aguilar, S. J., Bankard, J. S., Bui, E., & Nye, B. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090976 · Cited by 49
“Despite ongoing research on the automated detection of AI-generated texts [5], it has been difficult for teachers or plagiarism detection tools to distinguish between the texts written by students themselves and the texts generated by ChatGPT [6–8].”
Bridging the Gap: A Survey on Integrating (Human) Feedback for Natural Language Generation
Fernandes, P., Madaan, A., Liu, E., Farinhas, A., Martins, P. H., Bertsch, A., de Souza, J. G. C., Zhou, S., Wu, T., Neubig, G., et al. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00626 · Cited by 94
The AI-mediated communication dilemma: epistemic trust, social media, and the challenge of generative artificial intelligence
Sahebi, S., & Formosa, P. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-04963-2 · Cited by 77
Is generative AI reshaping academic practices worldwide? A survey of adoption, benefits, and concerns
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Cai, Y., Collier, T., Tahamtan, I., & Eftekhar, A. (2026) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104350 · Cited by 47
Economic Systems in the Metaverse: Basics, State of the Art, and Challenges
Huang, H., Zhang, Q., Li, T., Yang, Q., Yin, Z., Junhao, W., Xiong, Z., Zhu, J., Wu, J., & Zheng, Z. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3626315 · Cited by 66
Cross-domain detection of GPT-2-generated technical text
Rodriguez, J., Hay, T., Gros, D., Shamsi, Z., & Srinivasan, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.88 · Cited by 40
Human intelligence can safeguard against artificial intelligence: individual differences in the discernment of human from AI texts
Chein, J. M., Martinez, S. A., & Barone, A. R. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76218-y · Cited by 38
How Large Language Models are Transforming Machine-Paraphrase Plagiarism
Wahle, J. P., Ruas, T., Kirstein, F., & Gipp, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.62 · Cited by 35
Factors influencing trust in algorithmic decision-making: an indirect scenario-based experiment
Marmolejo‐Ramos, F., Marrone, R. L., Korolkiewicz, M. W., Gabriel, F. C., Siemens, G., Joksimovíc, S., Yamada, Y., Mori, Y., Rahwan, T., Sahakyan, M., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1465605 · Cited by 45
Transparent Human Evaluation for Image Captioning
Kasai, J., Sakaguchi, K., Dunagan, L., Morrison, J., Bras, R. J. L., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.254 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Does Human Collaboration Enhance the Accuracy of Identifying LLM-Generated Deepfake Texts?
Uchendu, A., Lee, J., Shen, H., Le, T., Huang, T.-H., & Lee, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v11i1.27557 · Cited by 40
Dual use concerns of generative AI and large language models
Grinbaum, A., & Adomaitis, L. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2024.2304381 · Cited by 47
Attribution and Obfuscation of Neural Text Authorship: A Data Mining Perspective
Uchendu, A., Le, T., & Lee, D. (2023) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3606274.3606276 · Cited by 44
Advancing health coaching: A comparative study of large language model and health coaches
Ong, Q. C., Ang, C., Chee, D. Z. Y., Lawate, A., Sundram, F., Dalakoti, M., Pasalic, L., To, D., Fox, T. E., Bojić, I., et al. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.103004 · Cited by 31
The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytelling
Xie, Z., Cohn, T., & Lau, J. H. (2023) · International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.inlg-main.23 · Cited by 61
LongEval: Guidelines for Human Evaluation of Faithfulness in Long-form Summarization
Krishna, K., Bransom, E., Kuehl, B., Iyyer, M., Dasigi, P., Cohan, A., & Lo, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.121 · Cited by 29
Quantifying the narrative flow of imagined versus autobiographical stories
Sap, M., Jafarpour, A., Choi, Y., Smith, N. A., Pennebaker, J. W., & Horvitz, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2211715119 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Students are using large language models and AI detectors can often detect their use
Paustian, T., & Slinger, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1374889 · Cited by 27
Can novice teachers detect AI-generated texts in EFL writing?
Wilde, V. D. (2024) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccae031 · Cited by 39
Do Language Models Enjoy Their Own Stories? Prompting Large Language Models for Automatic Story Evaluation
Chhun, C., Suchanek, F. M., & Clavel, C. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00689 · Cited by 41
A Comprehensive Survey of Fake Text Detection on Misinformation and LM-Generated Texts
Kwon, S.-C., & Jang, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3538805 · Cited by 30
A Framework for Exploring Player Perceptions of LLM-Generated Dialogue in Commercial Video Games
Akoury, N., Yang, Q., & Iyyer, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.151 · Cited by 30
Detection of AI-Generated Texts: A Bi-LSTM and Attention-Based Approach
Blake, J., Miah, A. S. M., Kredens, K., & Shin, J. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3562750 · Cited by 30
SwahBERT: Language Model of Swahili
Martin, G. L., Mswahili, M. E., Jeong, Y.-S., & Young-Seob, J. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.23 · Cited by 30
Writing without borders: AI and cross-cultural convergence in academic writing quality
Prakash, A., Aggarwal, S., Varghese, J. J., & Varghese, J. J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05484-6 · Cited by 35
Validation is the central challenge for generative social simulation: a critical review of LLMs in agent-based modeling
Larooij, M., & Törnberg, P. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11412-6 · Cited by 50
Synthetic Disinformation Attacks on Automated Fact Verification Systems
Du, Y., Bosselut, A., & Manning, C. D. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21302 · Cited by 34
Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization
van der Poel, L., Cotterell, R., & Meister, C. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.399 · Cited by 54
Beyond Generating Code: Evaluating GPT on a Data Visualization Course
Chen, Z., Zhang, C., Wang, Q., Troidl, J., Warchol, S., Beyer, J., Gehlenborg, N., & Pfister, H. (2023) · IEEE VIS Workshop on Visualization Education, Literacy, and Activities (EduVis) · doi:10.1109/eduvis60792.2023.00009 · Cited by 40
"I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial Intelligence
Atcheson, A., Khan, O., Siemann, B., Jain, A., & Karahalios, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714121 · Cited by 22
Towards Automatic Generation of Messages Countering Online Hate Speech and Microaggressions
Ashida, M., & Komachi, M. (2022) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.woah-1.2 · Cited by 25
Towards Automatic Boundary Detection for Human-AI Collaborative Hybrid Essay in Education
Zeng, Z., Sha, L., Li, Y., Yang, K., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30258 · Cited by 28
Bidimensional Leaderboards: Generate and Evaluate Language Hand in Hand
Kasai, J., Sakaguchi, K., Bras, R. J. L., Dunagan, L., Morrison, J., Fabbri, A. R., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.259 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices
Hawkins, W., & Mittelstadt, B. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3593995 · Cited by 21
SNaC: Coherence Error Detection for Narrative Summarization
Goyal, T., Li, J. J., & Durrett, G. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.29 · Cited by 22
Can generative AI infer thinking style from language? Evaluating the utility of AI as a psychological text analysis tool
Markowitz, D. M. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02344-0 · Cited by 19
Recognizing the artificial: A comparative voice analysis of AI-Generated and L2 undergraduate student-authored academic essays
Nañola, E. L., Arroyo, R. L., Hermosura, N. J. T., Ragil, M., Sabanal, J. N. U., & Mendoza, H. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103611 · Cited by 25
A User-Centric Analysis of Social Media for Stock Market Prediction
Bouadjenek, M. R., Sanner, S., & Wu, G. (2022) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3532856 · Cited by 22
Supporting Text Entry in Virtual Reality with Large Language Models
Chen, L., Cai, Y., Wang, R., Ding, S., Tang, Y., Hansen, P., & Sun, L. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr58804.2024.00073 · Cited by 21
Hear Us, then Protect Us: Navigating Deepfake Scams and Safeguard Interventions with Older Adults through Participatory Design
Zhai, Y., Xue, X., Guo, Z., Jin, T., Diao, Y., & Jeung, J. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714423 · Cited by 23
Detection Vs. Anti-detection: Is Text Generated by AI Detectable?
Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., Liu, J., Liu, X., Wang, X., & Lu, W. P. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57850-2_16 · Cited by 21
When a sentence does not introduce a discourse entity, Transformer-based models still sometimes refer to it
Schuster, S., & Linzen, T. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.71 · Cited by 18
Taxonomy of Abstractive Dialogue Summarization: Scenarios, Approaches, and Future Directions
Jia, Q., Liu, Y., Ren, S., & Zhu, K. Q. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3622933 · Cited by 20
AI or Human? Finding and Responding to Artificial Intelligence in Student Work
Fisk, G. D. (2024) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00986283241251855 · Cited by 16
Deconstructing NLG Evaluation: Evaluation Practices, Assumptions, and Their Implications
Zhou, K., Blodgett, S. L., Trischler, A., Daumé, H., Suleman, K., & Olteanu, A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.24 · Cited by 23
Studying Psychosis Using Natural Language Generation: A Review of Emerging Opportunities
Palaniyappan, L. K., Benrimoh, D. A., Voppel, A., & Rocca, R. (2023) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.04.009 · Cited by 14
Pitfalls (and advantages) of sophisticated large language models
Strasser, A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18851-0.00007-x · Cited by 20
Findings of the The RuATD Shared Task 2022 on Artificial Text Detection in Russian
Shamardina, T., Mikhailov, V., Chernianskii, D., Fenogenova, A., Saidov, M., Valeeva, A., Shavrina, T., Smurov, I., Tutubalina, E. V., & Artemova, E. (2022) · Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies · doi:10.28995/2075-7182-2022-21-497-511 · Cited by 34
Generative AI and Perceptual Harms: Who's Suspected of using LLMs?
Kadoma, K., Metaxa, D., & Naaman, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713897 · Cited by 14
WikiHowQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Document Non-Factoid Question Answering
Bolotova-Baranova, V., Blinov, V., Филиппова, С. В., Scholer, F., & Sanderson, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.290 · Cited by 15
GENIE: Toward Reproducible and Standardized Human Evaluation for Text Generation
Khashabi, D., Stanovsky, G., Bragg, J., Lourie, N., Kasai, J., Choi, Y., Smith, N. A., & Weld, D. S. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.787 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Beyond Lexical Boundaries: LLM-Generated Text Detection for Romanian Digital Libraries
Nițu, M., & Dascălu, M. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16020041 · Cited by 14
Unsupervised and Distributional Detection of Machine-Generated TextPreprint
Gallé, M., Rozen, J., Kruszewski, G., & Elsahar, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02878 · Cited by 42

Authors: Clark, E., August, T., Serrano, S., Haduong, N., Gururangan, S., & Smith, N. A.
Affiliations: University of Washington (US)
ORCID: Clark, Elizabeth
August, Tal
Serrano, Sofia
Smith, Noah A.
Venue: arXiv
Publisher: arXiv
Published: 2021
Pages: 7282-7296
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.00061
arXiv: 2107.00061
OpenAlex: W3174007554
Cited by: 290
References: 36
Citations by year: 2026: 28 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 7
FWCI: 22.41
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations: arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders: Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
Office of Naval Research (N00014‐18‐1‐2670, N00014-18, N00014)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Text Readability and Simplification
Keywords: human evaluation of generated text, assessment reliability, interobserver agreement, human annotators, text quality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks