CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 157Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchSurvey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

An Introduction to Audit Studies in the Social Sciences

Gaddis, S. Michael·2018·Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_1

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correspondence audits allow manipulation of a wider range of variables and are less subject to confederate bias and confounds than in-person audit studies, while allowing strong causal claims.

    “Correspondence audits allow for the manipulation of a wider range of variables and are less subject to confederate bias and confounds than are in-person audit studies, while allowing for strong causal claims (Gaddis 2018).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Gaddis 2018

  • The decomposition method sketches an incomplete picture of discrimination.

    “The decomposition method thus sketches an incomplete picture of discrimination (Borjas, 2020;Gaddis, 2018).”

    From The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023) · cites this paper as Gaddis, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaddis, S. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Gaddis, S. Michael
ORCID
Gaddis, S. Michael
Venue
Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2018
Pages
3-44
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_1
OpenAlex
W2770914390
Cited by
157
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
82.49
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Keywords
audit studies, correspondence audit, discriminatory behavior, social desirability bias, field experiments, discrimination measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review