Cited by 252Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Universal online interventions might engage psychologically distressed university students who are unlikely to seek formal help

Open access
Ryan, Megan L, Shochet, Ian M, Stallman, Helen M·2010·Advances in Mental Health

Abstract

University students are a high risk population for mental health problems, yet few seek professional help when experiencing problems. This study explored the potential role of an online intervention for promoting wellbeing in university students, by investigating students’ help-seeking behaviour, intention to use online interventions and student content preference for such interventionss; 254 university students responded to an online survey designed for this study. As predicted, students were less likely to seek help as levels of psychological distress increased. Conversely, intention to use an online intervention increased at higher levels of distress, with 39.1%, 49.4% and 57.7% of low, moderate and severely distressed students respectively indicating they would use an online program supporting student well-being. Results suggest that online interventions may be a useful way to provide help to students in need who otherwise may not seek formal help.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5172/jamh.9.1.73

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, M. L., Shochet, I. M., & Stallman, H. M.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Advances in Mental Health
Published
2010-08
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
73-83
ISSN
  • 1446-7984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1838-7357
  • 1837-4905
OpenAlex
W2138532568
Cited by
252
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Centre for Health Research; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
online intervention, help-seeking, psychological distress, university students, student well-being, content preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review