Cited by 202Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Free Range users and One Hit Wonders: Community Users of an Internet-Based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Program

Christensen, Helen, Griffiths, Kathy, Groves, Chloe, Korten, Ailsa·2006·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about the predictors of symptom change or the methods that might increase user ‘compliance’ on websites designed to improve mental health outcomes. The present paper: (i) examines predictors of expected final depression and anxiety scores on the MoodGYM website as a function of user characteristics; and (ii) compares the compliance rates of the original site with the new public version of the site (MoodGYM Mark II). The latter site requires compulsory completion of ‘core’ online assessments and may increase completion of site questionnaires. Method: MoodGYM Mark I participants were 19 607 visitors (public registrants) between April 2001 and September 2003 plus 182 participants who had been randomly assigned to MoodGYM in an earlier trial (The BlueMood Trial). MoodGYM Mark II participants were 38 791 public registrants of the MoodGYM Mark II site collected between September 2003 and October 2004. Symptom assessments are repeated within the website intervention to allow the examination of change in symptoms. Outcome variables were gender, initial depression severity scores, number of assessments completed and final anxiety and depression scores. Results: Men are predicted to be 0.19 units (SE = 0.095) higher than women on depression, controlling for the initial depression level and number of modules completed. For initial depression scores above 2, it is predicted that the final score will indicate improvement relative to the initial score, the magnitude of the improvement increasing as a function of the number of modules attempted. For initial anxiety scores above 2, it is predicted that the final score will indicate improvement relative to the initial score, the magnitude of the improvement increasing as a function of the number of modules attempted. Mark II registrants were more likely than to Mark I registrants to complete onsite assessments. Conclusions: Visitors to the MoodGYM site are likely to have better psychological outcomes if they complete more of the site material. Compulsory completion of core sections increases assessment completion. There is a need to examine further the significance of attrition from online interventions, to develop methods of handling missing data, and to investigate strategies to improve visitor dropout.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01743.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, H., Griffiths, K., Groves, C., & Korten, A.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Christensen, Helen
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
59-62
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2119707841
Cited by
201
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
MoodGYM, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, user compliance, gender differences in depression, attrition, mental health websites
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Australia, Community Mental Health Services, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review