Cited by 367Wireless Body Area NetworksNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of Implantable Medical Devices: From an Engineering Perspective

Open access
Joung, Yeun-Ho·2013·International Neurourology Journal

Abstract

From the first pacemaker implant in 1958, numerous engineering and medical activities for implantable medical device development have faced challenges in materials, battery power, functionality, electrical power consumption, size shrinkage, system delivery, and wireless communication. With explosive advances in scientific and engineering technology, many implantable medical devices such as the pacemaker, cochlear implant, and real-time blood pressure sensors have been developed and improved. This trend of progress in medical devices will continue because of the coming super-aged society, which will result in more consumers for the devices. The inner body is a special space filled with electrical, chemical, mechanical, and marine-salted reactions. Therefore, electrical connectivity and communication, corrosion, robustness, and hermeticity are key factors to be considered during the development stage. The main participants in the development stage are the user, the medical staff, and the engineer or technician. Thus, there are three different viewpoints in the development of implantable devices. In this review paper, considerations in the development of implantable medical devices will be presented from the viewpoint of an engineering mind.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5213/inj.2013.17.3.98

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Jiang, 2010, Implantable neural prostheses 2: techniques and engineering approaches, 28
  2. Magjarevic, 2010, Zdrav Vestn, 79, 55
  3. Furman, 2002, Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J, 2, 2
  4. Axisa, 2009, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009, 4864
  5. Narasimhan, 2010, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010, 6425
  6. Sugii, 2003, Fujitsu Sci Tech J, 39, 9
  7. Mallela, 2004, Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J, 4, 201
  8. Kramar, 2012, GRANT J, 1, 77
  9. Waurzyniak, 2010, Manuf Eng, 144, 1
  10. Tilton, 2004, Manag Infect Control, 66
  11. Silindir, 2009, FABAD J Pharm Sci, 34, 43
  12. Schuettler, 2011, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2011, 2296
  13. von Metzen, 2007, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2007, 6601
  14. Placko, 2000, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, 355
  15. Bundy, 1994, Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 22, 139
  16. Bruck, 1991, J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 1, 89
  17. Chlebowski, 2012, Biomed Mater Eng, 22, 361
  18. Schuettler, 2010, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010, 1585
  19. Chen, 2011, Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 125, 29
  20. Kazemi, 2004, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 6, 4093
  21. Guenther, 2011, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2011, 6717
  22. Seo, 1989, Front Med Biol Eng, 1, 319
  23. Mitcheson, 2010, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010, 3432

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Joung, Y.-H.
Affiliations
Hanbat National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Joung, Yeun-Ho
Venue
International Neurourology Journal
Published
2013
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
98
ISSN
  • 2093-4777 (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-6931
OpenAlex
W2003687987
Cited by
367
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Neurourology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Innovative Technology Development Program funded by the Small and Medium Business Administration of Korea (S2105913)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
biomedical implants, cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implants, blood pressure sensor, biomaterials, implantable batteries, electrical power consumption, device miniaturization, wireless communication, corrosion, hermeticity, electrical connectivity, population aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review