CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 682Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 336 of the 336 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Bright Side of Being Prosocial at Work, and the Dark Side, Too: A Review and Agenda for Research on Other-Oriented Motives, Behavior, and Impact in Organizations

Bolino, Mark C., Grant, Adam M.·2016·Academy of Management Annals
DOI 10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

More than a quarter century ago, organizational scholars began to explore the implications of prosociality in organizations. Three interrelated streams have emerged from this work, which focus on prosocial motives (the desire to benefit others or expend effort out of concern for others), prosocial behaviors (acts that promote/protect the welfare of individuals, groups, or organizations), and prosocial impact (the experience of making a positive difference in the lives of others through one's work). Prior studies have highlighted the importance of prosocial motives, behaviors, and impact, and have enhanced our understanding of each of them. However, there has been little effort to systematically review and integrate these related lines of work in a way that furthers our understanding of prosociality in organizations. In this article, we provide an overview of the current state of the literature, highlight key findings, identify major research themes, and address important controversies and debates. We call for an expanded view of prosocial behavior and a sharper focus on the costs and unintended consequences of prosocial phenomena. We conclude by suggesting a number of avenues for future research that will address unanswered questions and should provide a more complete understanding of prosociality in the workplace.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260

Cites

336 of 336 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 336 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ashforth B. E., 1999, Academy of Management Review, 24, 413
  2. Bem D. J., 1972, Advances in experimental social psychology
  3. Figley C. R., 1995, Compassion fatigue
  4. Klimecki O., 2012, Pathological altruism, 368
  5. Kram K. E., 1985, Mentoring at work
  6. 10.1080/19416520.2011.574506 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Peter L. J., 1969, The Peter principle
  8. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.529 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/014920639802400307 · DOI
  10. Tavris C., 2008, Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful actions.
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.722 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–680 of 680

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
ORCID
Venue
Academy of Management Annals
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2016-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
599-670
ISSN
  • 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-6520
DOI
10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
OpenAlex
W4246718271
Cited by
682
References
336
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 5
FWCI
73.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
prosocial behavior, prosocial motivation, prosocial impact, unintended consequences, helping behavior, organizational behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review