The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COGNITION, CAPABILITIES, AND INCENTIVES: ASSESSING FIRM RESPONSE TO THE FIBER-OPTIC REVOLUTION.
Abstract
This study examines how CEO cognition, organizational capabilities, and organizational incentives interacted to shape firm strategy during the fiber-optic revolution. I tested for these factors' association with subsequent investment in optical technologies using longitudinal data from 71 communications firms. Results show that each is separately important in shaping outcomes, and their alignment toward the adoption of a new technology leads to the greatest levels of change. In addition, cognition can compensate when organization-level factors are lacking. Considering cognition, capabilities, and incentives together contributes to a more contingent view of the conditions under which CEO cognition matters for firm strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666980 · Cited by 1,862
Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004 · Cited by 1,290
Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments
Burgelman, R. A. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393493 · Cited by 1,018
Cited by
Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314561301 · Cited by 1,045
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0401 · Cited by 774
Self-citationThinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661
Self-citationCognitive Processes of Opportunity Recognition: The Role of Structural Alignment
Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0462 · Cited by 582
Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.460 · Cited by 335
Public-Private Institutions as Catalysts of Upgrading in Emerging Market Societies
McDermott, G. A., Corredoira, R. A., & Kruse, G. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.47084929 · Cited by 197
Corredoira, R. A., & McDermott, G. A. (2014) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.19 · Cited by 143
Antecedents of social sustainability noncompliance in the Indian apparel sector
Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., Deakins, E., & Mani, V. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108038 · Cited by 34
Zhou, L., Li, J., Liu, Y., Tian, F., Zhang, X., & Qin, W. (2019) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-03-2019-0099 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 672-695
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006923470
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
