CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 800Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLabor Movements and UnionsManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice

Burris, Ethan R.·2012·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.5465/amj.2010.0562
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines whether managerial responses to employees speaking up depend on the type of voice exhibited—that is, whether employees speak up in challenging or supportive ways. In one field study and two experimental studies, I found that managers view employees who engage in more challenging forms of voice as worse performers and endorse their ideas less than those who engage in supportive forms of voice. Further, perceptions of loyalty and threat mediated these relationships, but in different ways. I discuss implications for research on voice, proactivity, and social persuasion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2010.0562

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Dutton J. E., 1993, Academy of Management Review, 18, 397, 10.5465/amr.1993.9309035145 · DOI
  2. Edwards M. S., 2009, Voice and silence in organizations, 275
  3. Frese M., 2001, Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133
  4. Grant A. M., 2008, Research in organizational behavior, 28, 3
  5. Janis I. L., 1982, Victims of groupthink
  6. Morrison E. W., 2011, Academy of Management annals, 5, 373
  7. Morrison E. W., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 706, 10.5465/amr.2000.3707697 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Pekel K., 1998, Studies in Intelligence, 41, 85
  9. Van Dyne L., 1995, Research in organizational behavior, 17, 215

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 799

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Burris, E. R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Burris, Ethan R.
ORCID
Burris, Ethan R.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2012-08
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
851-875
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.5465/amj.2010.0562
OpenAlex
W2039335540
Cited by
800
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
48.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
employee voice, managerial responses, organizational loyalty, threat perception, proactive behavior, social persuasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review