The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interorganizational Relationships as Political Battlefields: How Fragmentation within Organizations Shapes Relational Dynamics between Organizations
Open accessAbstract
Whereas extant theorizing on interorganizational relational dynamics has highlighted the importance of between-partner differences, we shift attention to within-partner differences. We explore how internal fragmentation—that is, the existence of multiple coalitions within a partner organization, each with different interests and perspectives—influences the evolution of relational characteristics in interorganizational relationships. Based on a longitudinal case study of a dyadic strategic alliance, we develop a process model, describing how internal fragmentation within one of the partner organizations can lead to a counterintuitive relational pattern—namely, “dual relational dynamics”—where decision makers of both partners continue renewing their formal commitments, while simultaneously experiencing negative trust dynamics. We show that the existence of different belief systems within one partner organization can lead to a politically charged process, wherein different coalitions within this organization frame and act upon interorganizational events in different ways. This politically charged process can fuel both hope and disappointment among decision makers of both partner organizations, leading to dual relational dynamics. Our findings contribute by advocating a political perspective on interorganizational relationships. We also demonstrate the relevance of this political perspective by showing how it challenges the dominant notion of interorganizational relational dynami…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Partners work within their own organizations has a bearing on relationship dynamics between IOR partners in the pursuit of cooperationthat is, the joint implementation of common goals (Brattström & Faems, 2019).”
From Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Brattström & Faems, 2019
Citations
Cites
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609104803 · Cited by 1,821
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.5465/ame.2001.4251563 · DOI
- Ariño A., 1998, Organization Science, 9, 306, 10.1287/orsc.9.3.306 · DOI · Paper page
- Bidwell M. J., 2012, Organization Science, 23, 1622, 10.1287/orsc.1120.0772 · DOI
- Bottom W. P., 2002, Organization Science, 13, 497, 10.1287/orsc.13.5.497.7816 · DOI
- Brattström A., 2019, Organization Studies, 40, 1685, 10.1177/0170840618789195 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2014.0323 · DOI
- 10.5465/19416520.2014.875669 · DOI
- Cyert R. M., 1963, A behavioral theory of the firm
- Das T. K., 2000, Organization Science, 11, 77, 10.1287/orsc.11.1.77.12570 · DOI
- Das T. K., 2001, Organization Studies, 22, 251, 10.1177/0170840601222004 · DOI
- Doz Y. L., 1996, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 55, 10.1002/smj.4250171006 · DOI
- Dyer J. H., 1997, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 535, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<535::AID-SMJ885>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
- Dyer J. H., 2000, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
- Dyer J. H., 2018, Strategic Management Journal, 39, 3140, 10.1002/smj.2785 · DOI
- Elfenbein D. W., 2014, Organization Science, 25, 222, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0824 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2008.35732527 · DOI
- Farina C. J., 1995, Hope and hopelessness: Critical clinical constructs
- 10.5465/19416520.2014.875671 · DOI
- Geppert M., 2016, Organization Studies, 37, 1209, 10.1177/0170840616656152 · DOI
- Geppert M., 2014, International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 226, 10.1111/ijmr.12018 · DOI
- Gioia D. A., 2013, Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15, 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
- Glynn M. A., 2000, Organization Science, 11, 285, 10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496 · DOI
- Goerzen A., 2005, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 333, 10.1002/smj.447 · DOI
- Gouldner A. W., 1960, American Sociological Review, 25, 161, 10.2307/2092623 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/256729 · DOI
- Hambrick D. C., 1987, Research in organizational behavior, 9, 369
- Hamel G., 1991, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83, 10.1002/smj.4250120908 · DOI
- Howard-Grenville J. A., 2007, Organization Science, 18, 560, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0266 · DOI
- Kaplan S., 2008, Organization Science, 19, 729, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0340 · DOI
- Koveshnikov A., 2016, Organization Studies, 37, 1353, 10.1177/0170840616634129 · DOI
- Lazarus R. S., 1999, Social Research, 66, 653
- 10.5465/annals.2016.0033 · DOI
- Madhok A., 1995, Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 117, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490168 · DOI
- Majchrzak A., 2015, Journal of Management, 41, 1338, 10.1177/0149206314563399 · DOI
- March J. G., 1962, Journal of Politics, 24, 662, 10.1017/S0022381600016169 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2010.0727 · DOI
- Nickerson J. A., 2003, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 433, 10.2307/3556680 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1990.4308156 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/256601 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455 · DOI
- Perkmann M., 2015, Research Policy, 44, 1133, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.006 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2012.0098 · DOI
- Ring P. S., 1997, The formation of interorganizational networks, 113, 10.1093/oso/9780198289487.003.0005 · DOI
- Ring P. S., 1992, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483, 10.1002/smj.4250130702 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1994.9410122009 · DOI
- 10.5465/annals.2014.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Schilke O., 2013, Strategic Organization, 11, 281, 10.1177/1476127012472096 · DOI
- Sitkin S. B., 1993, Organization Science, 4, 367, 10.1287/orsc.4.3.367 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1985.4278178 · DOI
- Tolbert P., 1996, Handbook of organization studies, 175
- Vaara E., 2003, Journal of Management Studies, 40, 859, 10.1111/1467-6486.00363 · DOI
- Vaara E., 2010, Organization Science, 21, 3, 10.1287/orsc.1080.0394 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2008.34422019 · DOI
- Vaara E., 2005, Journal of Management Studies, 42, 595, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00510.x · DOI
- Van de Ven A. H., 1990, Organization Science, 1, 313, 10.1287/orsc.1.3.313 · DOI
- van Maanen J., 1979, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539, 10.2307/2392360 · DOI
- Vlaar P. W. L., 2007, Group & Organization Management, 32, 407, 10.1177/1059601106294215 · DOI
- Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Whitford J., 2016, Organization Studies, 37, 1227, 10.1177/0170840616634131 · DOI
- Woolthuis R. K., 2005, Organization Studies, 26, 813, 10.1177/0170840605054594 · DOI
- Zaheer A., 1998, Organization Science, 9, 141, 10.1287/orsc.9.2.141 · DOI · Paper page
- Zaheer A., 1995, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 373, 10.1002/smj.4250160504 · DOI
- Zeelenberg M., 1998, Cognition and Emotion, 12, 221, 10.1080/026999398379727 · DOI
- Zeelenberg M., 2000, Cognition and Emotion, 14, 521, 10.1080/026999300402781 · DOI
- Zhong W., 2017, Journal of Management, 43, 1050, 10.1177/0149206314546373 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320901565 · Cited by 525
Metadata
- Authors
- Brattström, A., & Faems, D.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
- WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management (DE)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1591-1620
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2982161205
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lup.lub.lu.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- interorganizational relationships, internal fragmentation, strategic alliances, trust dynamics, political process, belief systems, alliance renewal, relational dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review