Cited by 1,545Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorManagement and Organizational StudiesSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic ‘Remedies’ for Trust/Distrust

Sitkin, Sim B., Roth, Nancy L.·1993·Organization Science

Abstract

Organizations frequently adopt formal rules, contracts, or other legalistic mechanisms when interpersonal trust is lacking. But recent research has shown such legalistic “remedies” for trust-related problems to be ineffective in restoring trust. To explain this apparent ineffectiveness, this paper outlines a theory that distinguishes two dimensions of trust—task-specific reliability and value congruence—and shows how legalistic mechanisms respond only to reliability concerns, while ignoring value-related concerns. Organizational responses to employees with HIV/AIDS are used as a case illustration that supports the theory's major propositions. The paper concludes with an agenda for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.4.3.367

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
1993-08
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
367-392
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2008519080
Cited by
1,545
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 76
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
interpersonal trust, distrust, value congruence, HIV/AIDS in the workplace, trust repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review