Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,257Cultural Differences and ValuesGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementQuality of Life Measurement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept

Hofstede, Geert·1984·The Academy of Management Review
DOI 10.5465/amr.1984.4279653
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research data on dominant work-related values patterns in 53 countries and regions are used to suggest how definitions of the quality of life are affected by national culture patterns.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258280

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Items 601–700 of 1,002

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hofstede, G.
Corresponding author
Hofstede, Geert
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1984-07
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
389
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5465/amr.1984.4279653
OpenAlex
W1987123461
Cited by
1,257
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 65
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
quality of life, cultural relativity, national culture, work values, cross-cultural comparison, value patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.