The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Abstract
Stakeholder theory development has increased in recent years, in part because of its emphasis on explaining and predicting how an organization functions with respect to the relationships and influences existing in its environment. Thus far. most researchers have concentrated on dyadic relationships between individual stakeholders and a focal organization. Using social network analysis, I construct in this article a theory of stakeholder influences, which accommodates multiple, interdependent stakeholder demands and predicts how organizations respond to the simultaneous influence of multiple stakeholders.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While a GVC can typically be conceptualized as an asymmetrical or high centrality network with a lead firm at its centre (Kano, 2018), these networks can also be heterogeneous in terms of such characteristics as depth, density, openness, and the presence of structural holes (Capaldo, 2007;Rowley, 1997).”
From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Rowley, 1997
In the citing paper
“stakeholder marketing recognizes that stakeholders interact directly or indirectly with each other (Rowley 1997;Neville and Menguc 2006;Shipilov and Li 2012)”
From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Rowley 1997
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
Granovetter, M. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228311 · Cited by 28,745
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,973
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 18,005
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
Pappi, F. U., & Scott, J. P. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075047 · Cited by 5,964
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Stakeholders’ environmental influence. An empirical analysis in the Spanish hotel industry
Lorente, J. J. C., Jiménez, J. D. B., & Gil, M. J. Á. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-5221(02)00034-9 · Cited by 168
Engaging small‐ and medium‐sized businesses in sustainability
Loucks, E. S., Martens, M. L., & Cho, C. H. (2010) · Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/20408021011089239 · Cited by 173
Greenley, G. E., Hooley, G., & Rudd, J. M. (2004) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.004 · Cited by 172
Harvey, B. W., & Schaefer, A. (2001) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1006356928957 · Cited by 168
Deephouse, D. L., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9864-3 · Cited by 168
Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to E-Government
Flak, L. S., & Rose, J. (2005) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01631 · Cited by 168
Tao, Y., Shen, Q., Shi, Q., Lai, X., Li, C. Z., & Xu, K. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.004 · Cited by 168
Is it too complex? The curious case of supply network complexity and focal firm innovation
Sharma, A., Pathak, S., Borah, S. B., & Adhikary, A. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1067 · Cited by 168
Steurer, R. (2005) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.467 · Cited by 169
Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lokkesmoe, K. J. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00238 · Cited by 161
Administrative environmental innovations, supply network structure, and environmental disclosure
Bellamy, M. A., Dhanorkar, S., & Subramanian, R. (2020) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1114 · Cited by 172
Organizing external stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational projects: Opening the black box
Lehtinen, J., & Aaltonen, K. (2020) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.12.001 · Cited by 160
“environments and inter-organizational contexts where internal stakeholders jointly organize external stakeholder engagement has been long called for, yet without much scrutiny (Freeman et al., 2010; Rowley, 1997).”
BackgroundManaging inter-organizational networks for value creation in the front-end of projects
Matinheikki, J., Artto, K. A., Peltokorpi, A., & Rajala, R. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.003 · Cited by 178
Cording, M., Harrison, J. S., Hoskisson, R. E., & Jonsen, K. (2013) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0002 · Cited by 157
Understanding primary stakeholders' multiple roles in hallmark event tourism management
Todd, L., Leask, A., & Ensor, J. (2016) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.09.010 · Cited by 185
Dobele, A. R., Westberg, K., Steel, M., & Flowers, K. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1775 · Cited by 158
Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK
Chinyio, E., & Akintoye, A. (2008) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190802078310 · Cited by 158
The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change
Hendy, J., & Barlow, J. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.009 · Cited by 189
Jonker, J. B., & Foster, D. (2002) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.23 · Cited by 156
Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure?
Guan, J., Zuo, K., Chen, K., & Yam, R. C. M. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.003 · Cited by 163
Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance
Harjoto, M. A., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/cg-10-2019-0306 · Cited by 156
Social entrepreneurship orientation and company success: The mediating role of social performance
Gali, N., Niemand, T., Shaw, E., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., & Brem, A. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120230 · Cited by 184
Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes
Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.009 · Cited by 153
Pardo-Bosch, F., Pujadas, P., Morton, C., & Cervera, C. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102957 · Cited by 153
Sustainable business: learning - action networks as organizational assets
Clarke, S. F., & Roome, N. J. (1999) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199909/10)8:5 · Cited by 153
The effects of sustainable development on firms' financial performance – an empirical approach
Chang, D., & Kuo, L.-C. R. (2008) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.351 · Cited by 152
Shake Your Stakeholder: Firms Leading Engagement to Cocreate Sustainable Value
Sulkowski, A. J., Edwards, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2017) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722129 · Cited by 177
Extending the application of stakeholder influence strategies to environmental disclosures
Elijido-Ten, E. O., Kloot, L., & Clarkson, P. M. (2010) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513571011092547 · Cited by 151
Building Stakeholder Theory with a Decision Modeling Methodology
Winn, M. I. (2001) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030104000202 · Cited by 150
Framework for Stakeholder Management in Construction Projects
Yang, R. J., & Shen, Q. (2014) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000285 · Cited by 150
Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2007) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/14720700710820452 · Cited by 145
Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait
Al-Shammari, B. A., & Al-Sultan, W. (2010) · International Journal of Disclosure and Governance · doi:10.1057/jdg.2010.3 · Cited by 153
Do high performance work systems generate negative effects? How and when?
Han, J., Sun, J., & Wang, H.-L. (2019) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100699 · Cited by 169
Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility: Making Business Ethics A Two-Way Conversation
Goodstein, J. D., & Wicks, A. C. (2007) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200717346 · Cited by 148
Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation
Fassin, Y. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9474-5 · Cited by 147
Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge, Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions
Plaza‐Úbeda, J. A., Jiménez, J. D. B., & Carmona‐Moreno, E. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0231-9 · Cited by 159
Jia, Q., Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.022 · Cited by 156
‘Cleantech’ venture capital around the world
Cumming, D. J., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2016) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2016.01.015 · Cited by 150
Stakeholder Inclusion and Accounting for Stakeholders
Mitchell, R. K., Buren, H. J. V., Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2015) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12151 · Cited by 145
McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2011) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.001 · Cited by 145
Oehme, M., & Bort, S. (2015) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2015.8 · Cited by 144
Time to Break Up: Social and Instrumental Antecedents of Firm Exits from Exchange Cliques
Rowley, T. J., Greve, H. R., Rao, H., Baum, J. A. C., & Shipilov, A. V. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407914 · Cited by 144
Self-citationThe Stakeholder Research Tradition: Converging Theorists—Not Convergent Theory
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893930 · Cited by 144
Responsible Care: An Assessment
Prakash, A. (2000) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030003900204 · Cited by 138
Pullen, A. J. J., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., & Fisscher, O. A. M. (2012) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00973.x · Cited by 142
Yuan, J., Chen, K., Li, W., Ji, C., Wang, Z., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.109 · Cited by 142
Global Policies and Local Practice: Loose and Tight Couplings in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
Rasche, A. (2012) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq201222444 · Cited by 138
Mitnick, B. M. (2000) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030003900405 · Cited by 152
Corporate Social Responsibility as a Dynamic Internal Organizational Process: A Case Study
Bolton, S. C., Kim, C. H., & O’Gorman, K. D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0709-5 · Cited by 154
Risk Management Issues in Large-scale Sporting Events: a Stakeholder Perspective
Leopkey, B., & Parent, M. M. (2009) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184740802571443 · Cited by 152
How Firm Responses to Natural Disasters Strengthen Community Resilience
McKnight, B. A., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026616629794 · Cited by 140
Grosser, K., & Moon, J. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3510-x · Cited by 151
Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
Herald, K. (2008) · Cited by 140
The Customer Engagement EcosystemPreprint
Masłowska, E., Malthouse, E. C., & Collinger, T. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2694040 · Cited by 143
The Corrective Actions Organizations Pursue Following Misconduct: A Review and Research Agenda
Hersel, M. C., Helmuth, C. A., Zorn, M. L., Shropshire, C., & Ridge, J. W. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0090 · Cited by 151
Intra-organizational networking for innovation-based corporate entrepreneurship
Kelley, D. J., Peters, L. S., & O’Connor, G. C. (2008) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.010 · Cited by 136
Molina-Morales, F. X., Villaverde, P. M. G., & Parra‐Requena, G. (2011) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0214-z · Cited by 137
Motivations and obstacles to networking in a university business incubator
Cooper, C. E., Hamel, S., & Connaughton, S. L. (2012) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9189-0 · Cited by 151
Stakeholder Inclusiveness: Enriching Project Management with General Stakeholder Theory 1
Eskerod, P., Huemann, M., & Ringhofer, C. (2015) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.21546 · Cited by 156
Better with Age? Tie Longevity and the Performance Implications of Bridging and Closure
Baum, J. A. C., McEvily, B., & Rowley, T. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0566 · Cited by 133
Self-citationGuilt, Shame, and Reparative Behavior: The Effect of Psychological Proximity
Ghorbani, M., Liao, Y., Çayköylü, S., & Chand, M. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1350-2 · Cited by 142
Communication, interactivity, and satisfaction in B2B relationships
Murphy, M., & Sashi, C. M. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.020 · Cited by 168
Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions
Gregory, A., Atkins, J. P., Midgley, G., & Hodgson, A. M. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.044 · Cited by 135
Evers, N., Andersson, S., & Hannibal, M. (2012) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.12.0077 · Cited by 140
Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Riel, C. B. M. V. (2002) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030204100104 · Cited by 134
Cashore, B. W., van Kooten, G. C., Vertinsky, I. B., Auld, G. A., & Affolderbach, J. (2003) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00011-x · Cited by 134
Open Innovation and Stakeholder Engagement
Gould, R. W. (2012) · Journal of technology management & innovation · doi:10.4067/s0718-27242012000300001 · Cited by 134
Hendry, J. R. (2006) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650305281849 · Cited by 133
Gomez‐Conde, J., Lunkes, R. J., & da Rosa, F. S. (2018) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-01-2018-3327 · Cited by 136
Directors’ Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective
Hung, H. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0870-5 · Cited by 131
The Symbiotic Sustainability Model: Conceptualizing NGO-Corporate Alliance Communication
Shumate, M., & O’Connor, A. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01498.x · Cited by 131
Jules or Jim: Alternative Conformity to Minority Logics
Durand, R., & Jourdan, J. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0345 · Cited by 131
Stakeholder engagement: a mechanism for sustainable aviation
Amaeshi, K., & Crane, A. (2006) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.108 · Cited by 131
Introducing the Politics of Stakeholder Influence
de Bakker, F. G. A., & den Hond, F. (2007) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650307306637 · Cited by 130
Barrane, F. Z., Ndubisi, N. O., Kamble, S., Karuranga, E. G., & Poulin, D. (2020) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-04-2020-0164 · Cited by 129
An Organizational Stakeholder Model of Change Implementation Communication
Lewis, L. K. (2007) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00291.x · Cited by 128
Ruggiero, S., Onkila, T., & Kuittinen, V. (2014) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.09.001 · Cited by 128
Organizing Against Multinational Corporate Power In Cancer Alley
Berry, G. R. (2003) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026602250213 · Cited by 129
Big data in humanitarian supply chain management: a review and further research directions
Gupta, S., Nezih Altay, A., & Luo, Z. (2017) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2671-4 · Cited by 134
Mok, K. Y., Shen, Q., Yang, R. J., & Li, C. Z. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.017 · Cited by 127
What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques
Bryson, J. M., & Humphrey, H. H. (2003) · Cited by 127
Project business as a research field
Artto, K. A., & Kujala, J. (2008) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/17538370810906219 · Cited by 127
Value Creation Through Social Strategy
Husted, B. W., Allen, D. B., & Kock, N. (2012) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650312439187 · Cited by 133
Cashore, B. W., & Vertinsky, I. B. (2000) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1004728206505 · Cited by 121
Stakeholders’ Perspectives of Sustainable Tourism Development
Poudel, S., Nyaupane, G. P., & Budruk, M. (2014) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287514563166 · Cited by 120
A resource-based view of stakeholder marketing
Kull, A. J., Mena, J. A., & Korschun, D. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.063 · Cited by 149
Implementation of green innovations – The impact of stakeholders and their network relations
Fliaster, A., & Kolloch, M. (2017) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12257 · Cited by 120
CSR orientation incongruence and supply chain relationship performance—A network perspective
Liu, Y., Jia, X., Jia, X., & Koufteros, X. A. (2020) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1118 · Cited by 127
Facebook ‘friendship’ and brand advocacy
Wallace, E., Buil, I., & de Chernatony, L. (2012) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2012.45 · Cited by 120
Yang, J., Shen, Q., & Ho, C. M. (2009) · Journal of Facilities Management · doi:10.1108/14725960910952532 · Cited by 120
All for One and One for All? The Development and Transfer of Power across Organizational Levels
Fiol, C. M., O’Connor, E. J., & Aguinis, H. (2001) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4378017 · Cited by 120
Building a framework for issues management in sport through stakeholder theory
Friedman, M., Parent, M. M., & Mason, D. S. (2004) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184740408737475 · Cited by 119
Innovation diffusion: a stakeholder and social network view
Troshani, I., & Doolin, B. (2007) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/14601060710745242 · Cited by 120
Majoch, A. A. A., Hoepner, A. G. F., & Hebb, T. M. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3057-2 · Cited by 119
The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique
Coelho, P. R. P., McClure, J. E., & Spry, J. A. (2003) · Mid-American Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/19355181200300001 · Cited by 121
Information systems project abandonment: a stakeholder analysis
Pan, G. (2005) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.12.003 · Cited by 118
Scandelius, C., & Cohen, G. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.037 · Cited by 139
Sutton, T., Devine, R. A., Lamont, B. T., & Holmes, R. M. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.1258 · Cited by 127
Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing and equity crowdfunding
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Battisti, E., & Graziano, E. A. (2020) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-11-2019-0258 · Cited by 116
Stakeholder analysis in higher education
Chapleo, C., & Simms, C. (2010) · Perspectives Policy and Practice in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13603100903458034 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowley, T. J.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 887
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024782191
- Cited by
- 2,522
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 125
- FWCI
- 77.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- stakeholder theory, stakeholder influence, stakeholder needs, stakeholder relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review