The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking
Abstract
Technology implementation is complex and often unpredictable. Although previous research describes mechanisms related to the social construction of technology and technology use in organizations, researchers have focused little on the inputs to these models. In this article I attempt to fill this void by examining triggers for initial user sensemaking. The prediction of sensemaking should enhance the application of theories, such as adaptive structuration, and inform the management of technology through greater anticipation of user understanding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
The Challenge of Innovation Implementation
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259164 · Cited by 2,113
Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Cited by
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
Bentley University, U., Markus, M. L., Silver, M., & Fordham University (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00176 · Cited by 927
Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation1
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148693 · Cited by 869
Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits
Srivastava, S. C., Chandra, S., & Shirish, A. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12067 · Cited by 456
Capturing the Complexity of Malleable IT Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory for Individuals1
Schmitz, K. W., Teng, J. T. C., & Webb, K. J. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.3.07 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffith, T. L.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 472
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097324625
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 29.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/259137
- The paper
- Griffith, T. L. (1999). Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/259137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
