Cited by 377Technostress in Professional SettingsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 199 of the 199 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Does the Use of Information Communication Technology Affect Individuals? A Work Design Perspective

Open access
Wang, Bin, Liu, Yukun, Parker, Sharon K.·2020·Academy of Management Annals

Abstract

People design and use technology for work. In return, technology shapes work and people. As information communication technology (ICT) becomes ever more embedded in today’s increasingly digital organizations, the nature of our jobs and employees’ work experiences are strongly affected by ICT use. This cross-disciplinary review focuses on work design as a central explanatory vehicle for exploring how individual ICT usage influences employees’ effectiveness and well-being. We evaluated 83 empirical studies. Results show that ICT use affects employees through shaping three key work design aspects: job demands, job autonomy, and relational aspects. To reconcile previous mixed findings on the effects of ICT use on individual workers, we identify two categories of factors that moderate the effects of ICT use on work design: user-technology fit factors and social-technology fit factors. We consolidate the review findings into a comprehensive framework that delineates both the work design processes linking ICT use and employee outcomes and the moderating factors. The review fosters an intellectual conversation across different disciplines, including organizational behavior, management information systems, and computer-mediated communication. The findings and the proposed framework help to guide future research and to design high-quality work in the digital era.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/annals.2018.0127

Cites

199 of 199 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 197 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. American Management Association, & Epolicy Institute, 2007, 2007 Electronic monitoring and surveillance survey
  2. 10.5465/257090 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chen A., 2018, MIS Ouarterly, 42, 1023
  4. Coovert M. D., 2014, The psychology of workplace technology, 1
  5. 10.5465/19416520903047327 · DOI
  6. Parker S. K., Applied Psychology
  7. Potosky D., 2014, The psychology of workplace technology, 118
  8. Rice R. E., 2013, The SAGE handbook of organizational communication, 425
  9. Shorkey C. T., 1981, Social Work, 26, 374
  10. Venkatesh V., 2000, Information Systems, 1997, 342

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 377

Metadata

Authors
Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Parker, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wang, Bin
Venue
Academy of Management Annals
Published
2020-07
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
695-725
ISSN
  • 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-6520
OpenAlex
W3015596784
Cited by
377
References
197
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 5
FWCI
42.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Curtin University of Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
information and communication technologies, job design, employee well-being, job demands, employee autonomy, moderators, digital organization, employee work effectiveness, computer-mediated communication, management information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review